How Baltimore Port Closure Affects Coal Producers In W.Va. 

For now, the companies that produce the coal will have to find a way to other ports, mainly Norfolk or the Gulf Coast.

The closure of the Port of Baltimore to most shipping has a ripple effect for coal producers in northern West Virginia. 

Baltimore exported 28 million tons of coal last year, about half of it from the Mountain State.

After a container ship struck the Francis Scott Key highway bridge last week, collapsing the structure, Baltimore Harbor’s coal piers have been cut off from the rest of the world.

For now, the companies that produce the coal will have to find a way to other ports, mainly Norfolk or the Gulf Coast. If not, customers in India, China, Japan and South Korea, among others, may have to turn to alternative sources.

John Saldanha, a professor of global supply chain management at West Virginia University (WVU), said Baltimore is the second largest U.S. export port for coal behind Norfolk, accounting for about a fifth of U.S. coal exports.

He said even if Norfolk and other ports have the capacity to absorb coal shipments that would otherwise come through Baltimore, it will raise shipping costs. That includes more train crews, more railcars and locomotives and more space to store the coal on the ground at another port.

“In the short run immediately, clearly, there’s going to be an increase in transportation costs. And depending upon what capacity the rail carriers can find, and how much diversion capacity, the rail carriers find both on the transportation networks as well as at the ocean piers, that is going to tell whether the coal producers will actually have to throttle back on their production in the short run,” he said. “Because if they continue producing at current rates, and there is no way to load that coal onto railcars, and for those railcars to go to the port, and there is no capacity at the port, then clearly that will require the coal producers to throttle back on production.”

Saldanha said in ordinary times, northern Appalachian coal from West Virginia and Pennsylvania is closer to the Port of Baltimore. Now that, that’s been disrupted, even temporarily, producers may take a look at whether they need to consider an alternative,

“Given that Baltimore and its proximity to the northern Appalachian coal basin might have been attractive from a transportation cost standpoint. But putting all your eggs in one basket, shipping everything else with the port Baltimore, of course, such Black Swan events nobody can anticipate, but then you always want to hedge,” he said. “And if you have all of your eggs in one basket, and you’re exporting everything to one single export port, then if anything happens either to the transportation links to that port within the port or coming out of that port that is going to that’s going to disable your operation, or at least hobble your operation in the short run.”

The Longer Way Around

Also ordinarily, Mid-Atlantic ports are closer to markets in Asia through the Suez Canal. But recent turmoil in the Middle East has caused the diversion of oceangoing vessels around the Cape of Good Hope at the southern tip of Africa. Saldhana said that gives Gulf Coast ports an advantage.

“So normally, coming from the Port of Baltimore, it would have been a lot easier to go into the Suez Canal,” he said. “But now because of the Red Sea, and the Houthi rebels affecting shipping over there, all the ships, so going down from the Gulf of Mexico to the cape, that might actually even be a little bit more competitive compared to coming out of the East Coast, given that all the ships of several shipping companies are opting to route their ships down around the cape.”

Even if Asian customers may need to consider sourcing coal from elsewhere – Australia, for example – Saldhana said they still prefer northern Appalachian coal because of its quality.

“So I think in the long run, the northern Appalachian Basin coal provides a superior product to the other coal sources,” he said, “but in the short run, there are definitely substitutes that are available that, while not of the same quality, would definitely fill the need.”

Federal, state and local officials have said their first priority is to reopen the Port of Baltimore. But they will have to remove all the pieces of the fallen bridge from the water, and that’s not a small task. Saldanha said the port may not reopen for weeks, if not months.

U.S. Coal Consumption Falls 25% In 1st Quarter As Production Stays Flat

Production increased in Appalachia by 6.5 percent overall, and 14.5 percent in Central Appalachia.

U.S. coal consumption declined about 25 percent during January to March of 2023 from the first three months of 2022.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Quarterly Coal Report, the 100.3 million tons consumed in the first quarter, mostly to produce electricity, was the lowest since the COVID-19 onset in April to June 2020.

However, production of coal stayed virtually flat. Production increased in Appalachia by 6.5 percent overall, and 14.5 percent in Central Appalachia.

West Virginia production increased 7.2 percent statewide and 15.4 percent in the south.

Production increased 7.1 percent in Kentucky, 3.9 percent in Pennsylvania and 13.8 percent in Virginia, but declined 30.7 percent in Ohio.

Production in Wyoming, the leading U.S. coal producer, fell 3.6 percent. West Virginia ranks second, followed by Pennsylvania, Illinois and Kentucky.

U.S. coal exports increased by about 20 percent, to 24.6 million tons. Coal stockpiles also increased from early 2022 to early 2023, from 90.4 million tons to 114.3 million tons.

Still, U.S. consumption in early 2022 was around half what it was in the July to September quarters of 2017 and 2018. That likely reflects the ongoing retirement of coal plants as well as the decreased use of others still operating.

Coal Prices Are Breaking Records, But Production Is Dropping

Coal prices are double or triple what they were a year ago, but consumption is down.

Coal production is up from last year, but dramatically higher prices are not translating to a similar increase in supply.

U.S. coal production is up six percent from the first quarter of 2021, according to federal data from the Energy Information Administration.

But most of that growth was in Western states.

West Virginia coal production was up 3.6 percent in the first three months of the year, while Appalachian coal production was down 1.2 percent.

Coal is bringing in record prices: $168 a ton for Central Appalachian coal, and $141 a ton for Northern Appalachian coal, more than double what they were a year ago. Illinois Basin coal is $190 a ton on the spot market, up from about $35.

Still, U.S. coal consumption fell four percent in the first quarter of 2022 from the first quarter of 2021. And exports of U.S. coal used to make electricity and steel both fell in the first quarter of 2022 from the fourth quarter of 2021.

Coal Exports Drop

Government data shows a significant drop in coal exports contributed to a 26 percent decline in West Virginia's overall exports last year.U.S. Census…

Government data shows a significant drop in coal exports contributed to a 26 percent decline in West Virginia’s overall exports last year.

U.S. Census figures cited by the state show total exports of $8.4 billion last year, compared with $11.3 billion in 2012.

Coal remained West Virginia’s top export despite falling 40 percent in 2013 to $4.4 billion from $7.4 billion. Non-coal exports grew by $47 million to $3.9 billion.

Despite the overall drop, Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin says state exports contributed greatly to the state’s economic growth in 2013.

The state Department of Commerce says West Virginia exported products to 144 countries last year, up from 136 in 2012. Canada is by far the state’s top export market.

Plastics was the top exported products from the manufacturer sector.
 

Exit mobile version