Judiciary Committee Will Recommend Electronic Absentee Voting Bill For People With Disabilities

Members of the Joint Judiciary Committees voted Monday to recommend a bill to their respective chambers, allowing voters with certain physical disabilities to cast absentee ballots electronically.  

Currently, West Virginia allows voters with qualifying impairments to cast paper mail-in votes, as long as they’re on a special absentee voting list maintained by the West Virginia Secretary of State’s office.  

But, according to Jeremiah Underhill, legal director for the group Disability Rights of West Virginia, navigating a piece of paper can be an impediment for someone who has a serious hand or visual impairment. 

“Voting is a fundamental right that is preserved in the U.S. Constitution,” Underhill told the committee. “Everyone is afforded a legal opportunity to vote.” 

And, said Donald Kersey, general counsel to the West Virginia Secretary of State, everyone has a constitutional right to vote privately. That’s something West Virginia’s existing system for casting ballots may be violating.  

“If you’re a voter with a disability that prevents you from seeing [or] from using your hands, you don’t have any other way to vote right now in West Virginia, except by getting help from someone, you have to have someone mark the ballot for you,” he said.  

Kersey told lawmakers on Monday that counties must draw their ballot orders by Feb. 18, meaning the sooner legislators pass this bill, the better. 

“It’s something we need to do now,” he said. “It’s the right thing to do, it’s the legally required thing to do.”
He added if the state doesn’t address the issue now, it eventually will have to by the legal order of a court. 

Some states have already dealt with this, including the Maryland Board of Elections in 2016 and the Ohio Secretary of State’s office in 2017. In both situations, a federal judge agreed paper ballot voting systems discriminate against those with disabilities.  

According to Kersey, a law firm in D.C. is making plans for similar legal action in West Virginia if the Legislature doesn’t make its own plans this session.  

Federal and local governments are required by the Americans with Disabilities Act to ensure voters with disabilities have a full and equal opportunity to vote. Because the voters mentioned is this bill are such a small subsect of West Virginia’s disability community, the Secretary of State’s office said it does not have numbers on how many voters this bill might ultimately affect. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, from 2013 to 2017 14.4 percent of the state’s population under 65 has a disability

West Virginia will not pay any costs in 2020 associated with this electronic ballot technology, Kersey said. Instead, he said Tusk-Montgomery Philanthropies offered to cover the equipment for the upcoming election. The same group funded a mobile voting pilot in West Virginia last year.  

After 2020, the bill gives counties the chance to decide what kind of technology they want to use and pay for. All the bill requires is that there be some kind of electronic method of ballot delivery for eligible voters with qualifying disabilities.  

In addressing concerns of possible voter fraud, Kersey said that with electronic ballots, voters will still have to register with personal information, offer their state-issued IDs for verification and do video facial recognition before casting an electronic ballot.  

Committee staffer Sarah Canterbury said the bill, as currently drafted, doesn’t include mental disabilities or any physical disability where it’s still possible to vote by paper ballot.  

She additionally pointed out Monday the state is only required to make a reasonable effort not to discriminate, exempting legislators from committing to extremely costly or burdensome efforts.  

“As more technological options become available, we can improve,” Canterbury told the committee. “But I think this is the best we can do, for this time.” 

According to Kersey, the bill will be made available online once it has sponsors. During the Judiciary Committee meeting on Monday, senators and delegates agreed to sponsor the bill in their respective chambers.  

 
 

Investigation: W.Va.'s Mental Health Services for Children Not in Compliance with Federal Law

    

A federal investigation of West Virginia’s system of care for children in need of mental health services shows the state fails to comply with federal law.

In a 30-page letter to Governor Earl Ray Tomblin dated Monday,  June  1, the U.S. Department of Justice said their investigation shows the state’s mental health care system for children “fails to provide services to children with significant mental health conditions in the most integrated settings appropriate to their needs in violation” of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Title II of the ADA requires that “individuals with disabilities, including children with mental illness, receive supports and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs,” according to the letter from the Department of Justice.

Findings of the Department of Justice investigation include:

  • Children who depend on the state’s DHHR for mental health services experience high rates of placement in segregated residential treatment facilities, including out-of-state placement, because DHHR has not developed a sufficient array of in-home and community-based services.
  • Children who live in the community and need, but do not receive in-home and community-based services, are at risk of unnecessary placement in segregated residential treatment facilities. Certain children with mental health conditions are at heightened risk: status offenders; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning children; trauma-exposed children; children with both mental health and intellectual disabilities; minority children; older children; and previously placed children.
  • West Virginia has not fully implemented its Olmstead plan. It has not developed comprehensive, community-based services for children with mental illness, including wraparound supports that are the standard of care for children with significant mental health needs. West Virginia has not developed statewide community-based crisis services, nor has it effectively diverted children from unnecessary placement in segregated residential treatment facilities.
  • West Virginia has taken insufficient steps to reallocate existing resources for mental health services to, and has not taken full advantage of Medicaid support for, in-home and community-based services.
  • Child-serving agencies in West Virginia fail to collaborate to address the needs of children with mental health conditions involved in multiple systems. As a result, agencies duplicate efforts, waste limited state resources, and provide fractured care delivery, causing confusion and harm to children and families.
  • West Virginia fails to engage families effectively to develop strategies to support children in their homes and communities. Families perceive their interactions with DHHR as more punitive than supportive, undermining the potential to develop strengths in the home and keep children in the community.
  • West Virginia continues to fund expensive placement in segregated residential treatment facilities both within the state and out of state, but neglects to develop sufficient community-based services. National data and local providers report that the cost of providing in-home and community-based mental health services ranges from $2,500-$3,500 per month. By contrast, the average cost of in-state placement in segregated residential treatment facilities ranges from $5,623 to $9,088 per month. In addition, out-of-state placements cost West Virginia over $20 million in fiscal year 2012.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Secretary Karen Bowling issued a response to the letter Tuesday, noting that–in her first days of being appointed to the post in July 2013–she was tasked with a comprehensive review of the department based on an audit of the agency conducted in 2012.
“DHHR has worked closely with the Department of Justice (DOJ) during its assessment and intends to continue to collaborate with the federal government and other stakeholders as we move forward,” said Bowling in Tuesday’s statement. “The DOJ assessment only strengthens our resolve to continue improving West Virginia’s child welfare system.  Looking to the future, we are committed to establishing a strong foundation at DHHR for our successors to build upon.”

Bowling said it wasn’t a complaint that prompted the federal governments investigation, but an analysis of statistics of the number of children in residential treatment facilities away from home. She also pointed to a number of ongoing improvements and strategic efforts to regain compliance with the ADA.

The DOJ said the investigation included four visits to the state (June 2-3, July 28-August 1, September 22-24, and November 3, 2014) to “assess the system of care for children with mental health conditions.” Investigators toured nine in-state segregated residential treatment facilities and two shelters housing children with disabilities.

The federal agency notified the state of the investigation on April 29, 2014.

Exit mobile version