Lawsuit Claims Morgantown Panhandling Ordinance Unconstitutional

A lawsuit filed in federal court Monday argues Morgantown’s ordinance against panhandling is unconstitutional. 

A lawsuit filed in federal court Monday argues Morgantown’s ordinance against panhandling is unconstitutional. 

Legal nonprofit Mountain State Justice filed the suit in the Northern District of West Virginia on behalf of Anthony Rowand, who has been cited by police at least seven times in the past year for violating a city ordinance against soliciting donations from people traveling in vehicles.

Lesley Nash, staff attorney for Mountain State Justice, said they are arguing the city’s ordinance violates Rowand’s First Amendment rights. 

“There have been numerous cases from just about every Circuit Court of Appeals in the country, as well as the Supreme Court, that have held that it is unconstitutional to put content-based restrictions on speech,” she said. “Because this ordinance in Morgantown specifically targets speech that solicits charity, that is a content-based restriction on speech, and we believe it is facially unconstitutional.”

Nash said the ordinance was first passed in 2005, but was sparsely enforced prior to an increase of citations starting in the summer of 2023. In a press release, Mountain State Justice said a “homelessness crisis” has led to “government efforts to shame, drive out, and ticket, fine and arrest our neighbors for experiencing poverty and illness in public.”

“At its heart, this case is not about being unhoused or people who are affected by homelessness, it is about the First Amendment right to free speech,” Nash said. “Soliciting charity is an act of free speech.” 

Nash said the goal of the suit is to see the ordinance not be enforced and preferably removed from the books entirely. She said the court process could take several months, but the next step is for Morgantown to be formally notified of the suit and submit a response.

ACLU: West Virginia Local Panhandling Push Unconstitutional

The American Civil Liberties Union is decrying attempts by West Virginia local governments to restrict panhandling as unconstitutional.

The Journal reports that in a letter to the City of Martinsburg and Berkeley County last week, Jamie Lynn Crofts of the ACLU of West Virginia said the proposal would violate First Amendment free speech rights.

Floyd McKinley “Kin” Sayre, Martinsburg City Council legal counsel, responded that the two governments are drafting a version that meets constitutional standards.

Sayre says the regulation, which still hasn’t been agreed upon, would define panhandling, say when and where panhandling is permitted, and define allowable ways to panhandle and false or misleading solicitation.

Croft says it’s possible to enforce existing harassment laws or narrowly restrict a specific spot if safety is at issue.

Martinsburg Council Debating on Panhandling Ordinance

The Martinsburg City Council is discussing the possibility of adopting a panhandling ordinance.

The Journal reports that legal counsel to the city council Kin Sayre presented a suggestions for an ordinance to the Martinsburg City Council on Thursday after county councilman Dan Dulyea approached him about coming up with solutions for panhandling.

The suggested ordinance includes definitions of panhandling, times panhandling would be permitted, places where panhandling would be permitted, manner of panhandling and false or misleading solicitation.

Ward 4 councilman Mark Baker raised concerns about the ordinance, saying former city leaders have tried and failed to create panhandling ordinances in the past.

Sayre has been tasked with working to draft an ordinance.

'Us & Them': To Give or Not to Give?

When you see panhandlers on the street, what do you do? Ignore them and walk the other way? Hand them some spare change? And, how do you decide?

A lot of people have strong opinions about panhandlers, but are they based in reason or in ideology?

That’s the focus of latest episode of Us & Them, the new podcast from Trey Kay & West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Subscribe to Us & Them

Trey Kay says the WVPB news staff’s reporting about a panhandling controversy in Parkersburg was the inspiration for his most recent episode.

Last fall, reporter Dave Mistich filed a story about the city of Parkersburg posting signs that read:

“Please Do Not Contribute to the Drug and Alcohol Problem by Giving To Panhandlers.”

“These signs made it sound like the city knew for sure that the money panhandlers get goes to drug and alcohol,” Kay recalled. “And I’ve always wondered whether that was true. I’ve always struggled with whether to give money to panhandlers. And so do a lot of people.”

Trey grew up in West Virginia, but he lives in New York now. He says whenever he’s in New York City, he encounters panhandlers. He recently stopped random people in Manhattan to ask if they give to beggars. He was surprised by how much thought people had given this question. Nearly everyone he talked to had a reason they choose to give – or not to give.

John, a guy Kay met at Penn Station, said he doubts that these people really need the money.

“I’ve seen some wearing $200 sneakers panhandling,” John said.  “So you tell me.  Why would I give that person money?”

A man named Simon told Kay he rarely gives because he believes panhandlers “just have to find a job.”

“I’ve seen a lot of alcoholics drinking, not really working,” Simon said.  “They’re just lazy.  They don’t want to work.”

Another person told him she doesn’t give because she’s seen TV news stories about beggars who are actually rich. 

Others said they gave if the person seemed sincerely needy. And some said they didn’t care how the panhandlers spend the money – even if it goes for alcohol or drugs. 

'Us & Them' Releases Latest Episode Focused on Panhandling

Friday marks the release of the latest episode of the West Virginia Public Broadcasting podcast ‘Us & Them.’ This episode was inspired by a story WVPB reporter Dave Mistich reported in the fall that focused on panhandling in Parkersburg.

The city had posted signs asking citizens not to give to panhandlers claiming donations would support the drug and alcohol abuse problems in the area. 

The West Virginia ACLU threatened the city with a defamation lawsuit, but today, the signs are still posted and nothing has been filed. 

Listen and subscribe to “Us & Them” and our other podcasts here: http://wvpublic.org/podcast

Exit mobile version