Counties Lose Green School Bus Funding From EPA

Three West Virginia counties lost federal funding to purchase electric school buses after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rescinded award funding last month. 

Three West Virginia counties lost federal funding to purchase electric school buses after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rescinded award funding last month. 

Mineral, Monongalia and Harrison counties were on track to purchase zero or low-emission school buses. Citing errors in their identification of rural areas in mountainous regions, the EPA rescinded those awards. Cabell, Clay, Calhoun, Kanawha, Grant and Lewis counties will still receive the funds.

U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is advocating for more accurate categorization of West Virginia communities. He sent a letter to Peggy Carr, commissioner of the the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Tuesday urging her to consider ruggedness scales that impact travel of students to and from school in NCES’s measurements. The center within the U.S. Department of Education is responsible for collecting and analyzing education data that help determine how federal resources for education activities are allocated. This includes classifying public school districts into four categories: rural, town, suburban and city.

The letter argues current methodology leads to much of Appalachia being miscategorized as “urban.”

“Your current rural measurement relies on mileage in sparsely settled and remote areas, however it does not account for sparsely populated mountain regions, and commuting times for difficult terrain are not adequately reflected,” Manchin wrote. 

“11.7 percent of the United States population lives in a rugged area, with 1.4 percent living in a highly rugged area. For comparison, West Virginia has the largest share of residents living in a rugged area, with 80.7 percent of the population living in a rugged area and 15 percent in a highly rugged area. While ruggedness alone cannot dictate rurality, we feel that it is an important consideration when determining what is rural and what is not.”

GreenPower Gets Grant To Build 47 Electric School Buses

GreenPower will get $18.5 million from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to build 47 electric school buses at its South Charleston plant.

GreenPower Motor Company will receive a federal grant to build electric school buses for nine West Virginia districts.

GreenPower will get $18.5 million from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to build 47 electric school buses at its South Charleston plant.

The award is part of nearly $1 billion in nationwide investment in clean school buses under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021.

GreenPower recently delivered its first electric buses to four West Virginia counties.

The 47 buses will go to Kanawha, Lewis, Calhoun, Clay, Grant, Harrison, Monongalia, Cabell and Mineral counties.

More funds are available for schools to replace diesel-powered buses. The EPA is accepting applications for its 2023 Clean School Bus Rebate program until Jan. 31.

First Four Electric School Buses Roll Out Of South Charleston Plant

On Wednesday, the company delivered smaller Nano Beast buses to Kanawha, Clay, Cabell and Monongalia counties.

GreenPower delivered its first four school buses to West Virginia school districts on Wednesday.

Fraser Atkinson, CEO of GreenPower, notes that the school bus we’re boarding got 170 miles out of a single charge, exceeding its advertised range of 140 miles.

GreenPower will begin building more of these buses, called the BEAST (Battery Electric Automotive School Transportation), in South Charleston in January. 

On Wednesday, the company delivered smaller Nano BEAST buses to Kanawha, Clay, Cabell and Monongalia counties.

Taking a ride, the first thing you notice about the Nano BEAST is how quiet it is. No roaring diesel engine, transmission or exhaust.

The bus is so quiet, company officials say, that the classroom behavior of special needs students has improved because of it.

Instead, the fuel comes from a lithium iron phosphate battery, the same kind now used in Teslas. 

The biggest power consumption other than running the bus? The heater.

“The traction motor, the drive motor is number one, of course, and the heaters are number two,” Atkinson said. “The AC draws very little in the summer.”

What about those mountains in West Virginia? Atkinson explains that with the right kind of driver training, the downhill portion of the trip can actually put power back into the battery.

“The other thing is that you use the brakes a whole lot less than a traditional vehicle,” he said. “And with really good drivers it can be literally a third of the usage of brakes compared to the equivalent.”

Right now, the battery is a big-ticket item. A battery pack for the bus can cost $20,000 and last for about 10 years. Atkinson says the cost will come down.

“So if that trend continues, in five years, the batteries will cost a whole lot less,” he said. “Then in 10 years, they’ll be a fraction of what they are now.”

The charging infrastructure has a way to go. Kanawha County took delivery of its first bus Wednesday, but it doesn’t have a charger yet. It’s been ordered, Superintendent Tom Williams says. 

The Mega BEAST could solve that. GreenPower will begin manufacturing it in South Charleston and California next year. Its battery will be capable of 300 miles on a single charge. The company calls it the longest range on the market. 

With that kind of range, a field trip from say, Wheeling to Charleston might not be that remote.

The Special Legislative Session Ends And EV Charger Infrastructure, This West Virginia Morning

On this West Virginia Morning, members of both parties voice concern over the lack of consideration and debate on proposed bills during the legislation’s special session this week, and a discussion about how efforts to build out a charging network for electric vehicles is progressing.

On this West Virginia Morning, Randy Yohe spoke to members of both parties that voiced concern over the lack of consideration and debate on dozens of proposed bills during the legislation’s special session this week. The session ended Tuesday around 9:30 p.m.

Curtis Tate spoke with Robert Fernatt, president of the West Virginia Electric Auto Association, about how efforts to build out a charging network for electric vehicles is progressing.

Also, a look at improvements in staffing shortages in the state’s social services as well as updates to West Virginia University’s restructuring efforts.

West Virginia Morning is a production of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, which is solely responsible for its content.

Support for our news bureaus comes from Concord University and Shepherd University.

Listen to West Virginia Morning weekdays at 7:43 a.m. on WVPB Radio or subscribe to the podcast and never miss an episode. #WVMorning

Don’t Drive A Tesla? Two Kinds Of EV Chargers Rule The Road, For Now

Curtis Tate spoke with Robert Fernatt, president of the West Virginia Electric Auto Association.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which Congress enacted nearly two years ago, provided billions of dollars to build out a charging network for electric vehicles. 

To get an update on those efforts, Curtis Tate spoke with Robert Fernatt, president of the West Virginia Electric Auto Association.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

TATE: You told me there were 1,900 fully electric vehicles in West Virginia last year, and 1,400 plug-in hybrids. What’s the catalyst for increasing those numbers? Is it charging infrastructure?

FERNATT: I think so, and I think a lot of the folks in our group think so. And we’ve been pushing for additional chargers in the state for many years. Our group worked with the State Parks Commission to get to work to get the level 2 chargers that we’ve got in the state parks. All the state parks that have a lodge have electric vehicle charging. We’ve been trying to get fast chargers at Tamarack but also Charleston and Morgantown are our primary focuses, anywhere we’ve got large numbers of transport vehicles. A confluence of major interstates in those three cities in West Virginia.

TATE: What’s the most popular brand of electric vehicle in West Virginia?

FERNATT: The number one registered electric vehicle in the state across plug-in hybrids, or fully electric, is Tesla. There are nearly 1,200 Tesla’s registered in the state as of 2022. But Tesla is the only brand that has fast charging throughout the state. So I can travel around the state and a Tesla, but I can’t do that in any other brand, practically. So, you know, I think you were seeing more adoption of Tesla vehicles, because they are more practical to travel with in West Virginia.

TATE: Why is Tesla’s charger considered superior to others?

FERNATT: Tesla has always been considered for the past several years, the gold standard in electric vehicle fast charging. And they do have a very nice solution, not just the plug, but also the chargers and all the systems and infrastructure that have to go behind that. So like authorization and billing, and the reliability of the chargers that they’re online and available, and that they just work. So Tesla has all that where a lot of other providers have struggled with that to be kind. And a lot of folks have had very poor experiences with other charging networks. Tesla has really figured out a lot of this. And they started in 2012, with the very first superchargers. So they’ve been doing it for a long time, a lot longer than other folks have been doing it. And their network is much larger than a lot of other folks. 

TATE: But there are other choices, right?

FERNATT: So we’re down to pretty much two, CCS (combined charging system) and Tesla. Tesla is about two thirds of the electric vehicle market in the United States. And then Ford said, we want to adopt the Tesla plug. And they didn’t just adopt a Tesla plug just because they thought the plug was better, even though in a lot of ways it is. But they adopted that plug so they can have access to the supercharger network. Tesla has the largest, most reliable network in the country. So Ford went that direction, then shortly, General Motors followed, then Rivian, then Mercedes Benz, then Nissan. So now we have multiple major manufacturers that are all saying, for North America, we’re going to switch to the Tesla plug away from CCS. Now, with those manufacturers, you’re at 80 plus percent of the electric vehicle market in the country. 

TATE: How long will we be using both? Is it kind of like VHS or Beta?

FERNATT: The Tesla plug has become the de facto standard for the country. But CCS will still have support for a while so I wouldn’t be concerned about that. And as we get back to NEVI, the national electric vehicle infrastructure funding that was part of the bipartisan infrastructure law. That money requires CCS plugs. So if a state is going to put in chargers it will have CCS support. Now a state could say well, it also has to have the Tesla, North American Charging Standard, NACS plug. We’re hoping that a lot of states do that. And some states have already said they’re going to do that. I think Kentucky said they are going to do that. Texas, maybe and there might have been another state. But it’s still kind of early in the, you know, putting out procurements for all the Navi chargers. But we’re seeing some state saying yes, if you’re going to put chargers in our state, you’re going to support both CCS and the Tesla plug.

TATE: What’s the appropriate interval for spacing chargers?

FERNATT: The NEVI program from the feds, it requires chargers every 50 miles, and within one mile of the Interstate exit. So all the chargers that the state is going to put in are going to meet those requirements. The only place where they’ve requested a slight waiver is the distance between Charleston and Flatwoods. Because you know, there’s not a lot between once you leave the Charleston area and a lot to get to Flatwoods and we can’t really we don’t want to put in a fast charger. You know, nothing against Frametown or Servia or Big Otter. There’s nothing at those exits. And if you’re going to stop for fast charging, you’ve got to have amenities. We need restrooms and hopefully a place to grab a bite to eat that kind of stuff. But from this plan, the latest plan, they’re proposing to put a charger in Elkview and in Sutton. So we’ll see and it’s slightly over 50 miles, so the feds may have to approve that. But yeah, the feds are requiring about every 50 miles I think that’s probably a little conservative in this day and age, with a modern electric vehicle doing two to 300 plus miles. They’re rated for that, obviously, depending on how you drive, you might not get that, but it’s a lot more than 50 miles.

TATE: How does the cost of charging an EV compare to a conventional vehicle?

FERNATT: I mean, it depends on you know, some variables. But I mean, if you’re talking about charging at home, electric vehicles are generally a third to a fourth of the expense of fueling, if you’re doing most of your charging at home, which most people are, most of your charging happens at home. If you’re doing a lot of fast charging, fast charging is quite a bit more expensive. So now you might be talking about me, maybe I’m about the same price as a gallon of gas or No, maybe not quite, but you’re getting up there. And it kind of depends on the area too. I mean, I’ve traveled in other states where it’s more expensive to fast charge; West Virginia is not as bad, although prices have gone up some especially since the pandemic. But generally in your daily commute and driving around town, you know, it should be third to fourth of the cost of gas. Back when gas prices shot up, mine, it was about a fifth of the cost.

TATE: What can renters do if they can’t install a charger at home?

FERNATT: That is a challenge. It’s a real big challenge for metro areas where you have a lot of apartment and condo dwellers, and you don’t have dedicated overnight parking. The ideal situation is you’ve got some kind of dedicated parking overnight to put in a charger. If you don’t have access to overnight charging at home, then you hope you can find something. Maybe you have workplace charging, some folks have that available to them. And if you don’t have that, then some folks have taken the plunge and then use the fast charger as their go to charging solution. I don’t know that I would recommend that because it’s quite a bit more expensive than charging at home. So, you know, if you don’t have reliable charging at home and you don’t have it at work, you know, a plug in hybrid might be a better solution, or just the regular hybrid. If you don’t have anywhere to plug it in. If you do you have a place to plug it in occasionally, you know a plug in hybrid might make more sense. But yes, that is an area that’s going to require more work. That is a challenge for the electric vehicle industry in the utility industry to address that issue, especially in metro areas.

Electric Vehicles Can Send Power Back To The Grid, Lawmakers Learn

Widespread adoption of EVs in the coming years could change how electric utilities and transmission operators like PJM manage the grid.

A fleet of electric school buses, like the ones now manufactured in South Charleston, can put power back into the grid during the day.

That, said Lory Murphy Lee, manager of regulatory and legislative affairs for the PJM regional transmission operator, means they can contribute to grid stability.

“It’s no longer a one-way street for plug-in electric vehicles,” she said.

Lee, speaking to the joint Energy Committee of the West Virginia legislature, noted that electric vehicles draw a small amount of power from the grid currently.

But widespread adoption of EVs in the coming years could change how electric utilities and transmission operators like PJM manage the grid.

School districts could be winners, especially when their bus fleets are idle over the summer. That’s a peak time for electricity demand.

Exit mobile version