Early Childhood Nutrition Is A Learning Experience For Parents And Children Alike

From allergies to introducing solids, the first few years of a child’s life have a surprising amount of decisions for parents to make.

From allergies to introducing solids, the first few years of a child’s life have a surprising amount of decisions for parents to make.

In the latest entry of “Now What? A Series on Parenting,” reporter Chris Schulz spoke with Isabela Negrin, assistant professor of pediatrics at West Virginia University Medicine, about the ins and outs of early childhood nutrition.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Schulz: Before a child is even born, how much of a role in the child’s health does the mother or the parents’ nutrition play in their development?

Negrin: I think while mom is pregnant with a baby, she can take a lot of steps to make some good choices nutritionally, that can kind of help baby down the road. Making sure that she’s getting a good variety of nutrients in her diet. And then generally trying to set the stage for the family to have good healthy choices overall and setting the stage for when baby is born, and starts to kind of get into the food eating realm.

Schulz: Feeding an infant historically has been portrayed as formula versus breastfed. You hear the phrase these days a lot, ‘Fed is best.’ Where does the science actually land on that?

Negrin: Ultimately, like you said, fed is best. We want babies to get the nutrients they need to grow and thrive. That can be obtained via breast milk, via formula, by a combination of both. Ultimately, whatever gets baby the nutrients that they need. The AAP, the American Academy of Pediatrics, does recommend, if possible, breastfeeding at least to the first six months of life. That gives a variety of antibodies and good nutrients to the baby that can help in multiple different areas. But that said, breastfeeding isn’t always an option for every parent or a mother. So in that case, formula is a perfectly equivalent option to breastfeeding as well.

Schulz: Obviously we want the child to be healthy, but that can’t really happen without a healthy parent. I do wonder about the stress of the pressure to breastfeed on parents. Can you speak to that a little bit?

Negrin: I think there’s a lot of stress just from either society, possibly medical professionals, a lot of stress put on parents encouraging them to breastfeed. But I think it’s important to find that balance and try to find somebody who supports the parent and what their preferences are and what helps with their personal goals. Whether that’s a matter of finding a lactation consultant to work with the parent to give them some tips and help with supporting breastfeeding or just being there for the parents or the family to say, ‘It’s OK to not breastfeed if this is very stressful for you,’ or if milk production is a concern. Like I said, formula is a perfectly equivalent feeding method for babies. So we definitely don’t want to put undue harm or stress on the parents and encouraging them to breastfeed when that’s not really in line with what their goals are.

Schulz: So before we move on to solid foods, our pediatrician prescribed or suggested supplements, specifically Vitamin D, which is kind of surprising, because as you said the narrative and the thinking is that breastfeeding provides the most nutrients, the most antibodies, just that extra boost. So why is it that in this day and age, we are suggesting that we supplement a baby’s nutrition, even when they are being breastfed?

Negrin: Vitamin D is one of the vitamins that’s very poorly transferred through breast milk. Even if mom is taking vitamin D supplements, she has to be taking a higher amount of vitamin D supplements for any of that to transfer into the breast milk. That’s one of the things that we do recommend breastfed babies do get supplemented. It is in formula. It’s actually not in high enough amounts in formula for newborn infants, they’re not getting enough vitamin D until they’re taking about a liter a day. So we do actually recommend vitamin D supplementation for all babies, not just breastfed babies, but it’s kind of more important for breastfed babies because we’re not quite getting that transfer through the breast milk. 

Vitamin D does get produced through exposure to sunlight and things like that. So there is some talk in some research about babies living in areas with higher concentrations of sunlight. So like Arizona, New Mexico, do they need as much vitamin D supplementation? There’s, I think, some research going on about that. But in general, it’s not harmful to add that extra 400 units of vitamin D daily. 

The other thing, too, that breast milk doesn’t transfer well is iron. So usually babies, like term born babies, have enough iron stores until they’re about four months old. So they have enough iron until that and then after that, if they’re still breastfed, we do recommend supplementing with an iron supplement just because that doesn’t transfer well in breast milk either. Until babies are starting to take more solid foods and can take some iron containing foods. 

Schulz: You mentioned iron. I’ve heard that iron rich foods should be the first foods that infants eat when they do start to transition over to purees and solids. Do you have any recommendations on that weaning process and some of those first foods that that children should be trying?

Negrin: It’s a good idea, first of all, to talk with your child’s doctor because every child is a little bit different. If they’re born prematurely, that might affect when you introduce foods. Generally speaking, we recommend starting to introduce foods around six months, sometimes a little bit earlier, depending on the development of the child. In terms of the first foods offered, there’s not really like one true best food to offer first. And in terms of purees versus solids, or more solid food, there’s a lot of discourse about that as well in terms of like baby led weaning versus starting with solely purees. In terms of starting with meats and things like that, there’s nothing totally off limits about starting with meat. I think texture is going to be kind of a big thing, especially for younger infants. You want to make sure that it’s something that they can developmentally manage and swallow, but in terms of totally off limits foods when starting it’s really just no honey and no cow’s milk. Other things like eggs are totally OK to start in that six months early food introduction as long as it’s small and easy to manage or pureed.

Schulz: We do hear that term a lot these days, baby led weaning. Can you define that for us? What exactly is baby led weaning?

Negrin: I think there’s probably different definitions based on who you ask. But in general, it’s allowing babies to kind of self-feed rather than the traditional scooping some puree out of a jar and spoon feeding it to baby. It’s kind of putting these foods out on the highchair on the table for the baby to self-feed. The thought is that they will tend to eat things that they’re developmentally ready for, and then kind of progress as they go. When this first started getting traction, I think there was a lot of questioning of ‘Are they going to be getting enough nutrients from it,’ or the choking risk. So the choking risk has kind of been a little bit debunked with the few studies that have been out. And they found that babies who do that do get about equivalent amount of calories, there’s still definitely a role for purees. And baby led weaning is just a matter of feeding baby what the family is eating, just maybe in smaller chunks or broken up more mashed up more and allowing baby to feed themselves rather than being spoon fed everything. So it kind of helps with their development as well.

Schulz: Let’s talk about allergens for a second. I have heard that the advice specifically around peanuts has changed and we want regular exposure now, which was not what it was even 10 years ago. What are the recommendations these days on introduction of allergens? Where should that be done? And how often should it be done? 

Negrin: You’re right, there’s been a lot of recent research and changes about especially just peanuts. In the early 2000s, there was an observation study that found that infants in Israel had a lower prevalence of having peanut allergy. That’s because one of the popular snack foods for infants in Israel is bomba, which is like a corn puff that’s made with peanuts. So they found that the early introduction of peanuts, and then that kind of spurred multiple studies after that, but the earlier introduction of peanuts did show a correlation with less peanut allergy overall. So in general, the recommendation is, if baby has no concern for eczema or any other kind of allergy, it doesn’t really matter when you introduce the allergen food, so peanuts, eggs, things like that. It’s totally OK to introduce it early, as long as it’s something that is not a choking hazard. So creamy peanut butter instead of, obviously, offering peanuts. 

And then, if a baby has some mild eczema that’s pretty well controlled, or there’s a family history of eczema or food allergy, then we do recommend introducing allergens early rather than later. Introducing around that six-to-seven-month period, with a small amount, you can do baby cereal with a tiny little bit of peanut butter and just kind of offer that to baby, kind of see if they have any kind of rash or anything like that. The only exception is babies who have very, very severe eczema, I do recommend talking to your doctor about that. because there may be a recommendation to either get them tested before trying the food, or possibly trying it in a doctor’s office, in a setting where if there were to be anything that happened that action can be taken. 

But in general I think it’s a good idea to start introducing those foods earlier. And then in terms of frequency of introducing, I usually recommend waiting when you’re introducing a new food, wait three to five days before introducing a new food. That way, if there were an allergic reaction or a rash that happens from that food you know exactly what caused it rather than kind of trying to play a guessing game of oh, we offered two or three foods, and we don’t know what caused it. 

Schulz: You’ve mentioned choking hazards, you mentioned texture for young children. Watching the development of that gag reflex is so scary. I think that can kind of be unexpected to people when children are entering the phase where they start to eat solids that you kind of have to let the child gag a little bit. What are your recommendations to parents to make that transition a little bit easier on them?

Negrin: Right, so that can be very scary, the gagging and kind of figuring things out with the textures. You have to understand that babies spent their entire life up at that point just drinking liquids. So having a solid in their mouth is a different texture. It’s a different feeling. I will say babies in general, unless they have any developmental concerns, they do a very good job about protecting their airway. So before you get to any concern about choking or things like that, they will kind of do their best to kind of either spit it out, gag, kind of make those coughing noises, but it can be very scary for parents. So in general, I recommend when introducing foods to always be supervising the baby, always be right there next to the baby, make sure that they’re supported, like in a highchair, where they’re not risking kind of falling over, or things like that. And then I do recommend parents to get a CPR class or CPR training just in case something were to happen, that they have the training to help if needed. 

I think there has been a big rise in the last decade or two about baby led weaning happening more frequently and the recommendations of that there’s not, just like with breastfed, breast milk versus formula, I don’t think there’s one correct way to introduce foods, whether you want to start with purees, whether you want to start with more like, quote unquote, regular food, or do a mix of both. It’s really just kind of making sure the baby is supervised, and in a safe environment to eat. And then, just because it is relatively new, and because research and pediatrics is also relatively slow, there’s not a whole lot of research out comparing baby led weaning versus pureed foods. But the research that is out shows that there’s really not a significant difference within choking between both methods.

DHHR Launches App To Help Support WIC Families With Breastfeeding

West Virginia has some of the lowest breastfeeding rates in the country – especially for participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, more commonly known as WIC. But the Department of Health and Human Resources is working to change that, by providing WIC participants with an app that provides 24/7 breastfeeding support. 

The app is called Pacify and it connects users to International Board Certified Lactation Consultants to answer questions and concerns about breastfeeding.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that for the first six months of life, babies get all of their nutrition exclusively from breastmilk. When babies begin eating solid foods, normally at six months, mothers are recommended to keep breastfeeding, at least until their baby is a year old. But West Virginia’s breastfeeding rates are well below the national average.

Only about 69 percent of women ever breastfeed compared to a national average of 83 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The DHHR said the hope is that if moms have more support, they will have an easier time with it and breastfeed for longer.

West Virginia WIC, which serves 75 percent of the babies born in the state, is the fifth WIC program in the nation to launch the app.

The app is free for all current, pregnant, and breastfeeding mothers in the WIC program. In a press release, the DHHR said Women can sign up by visiting their local WIC clinic. It is also available by subscription for moms not in WIC via the app store. 

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from Marshall Health and Charleston Area Medical Center.

Breast Milk Donation is Growing Across U.S. But It's Not All Safe, Doctors Warn

For a variety of reasons, breastfeeding is just not possible for everyone. Formula was a lifesaving development when it was first created. Before formula, a lot of babies who did not have access to adequate breast milk starved to death. 

Sometimes wet nurses provided babies with nourishment, if their mothers could not, or did not want, to breastfeed. These were usually women who earned an income by breastfeeding other women’s babies. In some cultures around the world, even today, milk sharing is a socially accepted practice among sisters and close friends who support each other by feeding a baby if the mother cannot produce enough milk. 

In America, milk sharing is not a widely accepted practice. But increasing awareness of breastmilk’s advantages over formula is leading some to turn to milk sharing. 

In 2017 the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a recommendation that at-risk, premature babies be fed ​donated, ​pasteurized​ ​breastmilk, if their mothers are not able to breastfeed. This milk comes from milk banks that are certified by the Human Milk Banking Association of North America, where donors are tested for contagious diseases. 

Credit Elise Amendola/Associated Press
/
A lab technician at the Mothers’ Milk Bank Northeast in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., prepares donated breast milk for pasteurization in August 2012. The process kills harmful bacteria.

But another, informal system of milk sharing could be putting some babies at risk. 

Cooper’s Story

Kathryn Ellis had fostered several children, but bringing a 10-day-old baby home from the hospital was an entirely different ​experience.  

“He was a safe haven baby, so he had been left at a hospital. He was tiny,” Ellis said.

At birth, baby Cooper weighed just six pounds. He had a pretty serious health condition, called hypoplastic heart syndrome, where the right side of his heart was not fully developed. Consequently, he needed multiple surgeries after he was born.

“The doctors even said to us before we took him home, “You don’t have to take him home. You can wait for a perfect baby.” And that wasn’t at all what i was thinking,” Ellis said. “I was thinking, “Of course I’m gonna take him and I’m gonna take care of him.””

So when he was 10 days old, Ellis took Cooper home, and started the process to adopt him. Like any baby, he needed around the clock feedings.

“I loved sitting just with him, and we’d sit up on the loft,” she said. “And the stove would be hot and in a fire and the heat would go up to that loft, and it would be quiet and dark. And I would look out the window and see snow and feel warm with him. I felt like that time was so special, to be just the two of us.”

Since Ellis was not his biological mother, she fed him formula. The doctors told her that, because of his condition, Cooper was vulnerable to viruses and infections.

Ellis had heard about scientific studies that show breast milk has immune boosting properties, and babies who drink breast milk have a better defense against viral infections, like the flu and common cold, so she wanted to feed him breastmilk. Most of these studies were done in the 1990s, and they led the American Academy of Pediatrics to recommend all babies be breastfed.

But since Ellis did not have her own breast milk, she decided to feed him donated milk. The milk usually arrived in a cooler packed with ice. The women who supplied the milk did not know each other, but they did have one person in common – a local midwife, named Angie Nixon, who had helped them deliver their babies. She reached out to each of them to ask if they would donate their extra milk. Nixon usually made the deliveries.

“All babies should have breastmilk,” Nixon said. “So when we heard about this baby in need, that was my first thought, “Wouldn’t it be great if we could get that baby some breastmilk?””

Safety Concerns With Milk Sharing

In this case, Nixon had seen the women’s medical histories, and no infectious diseases were passed onto baby Cooper. But, this type of milk sharing is risky.

The American Academy of Pediatrics warns that feeding babies donated milk in this way is not safe. They recommend milk banks require blood tests from all donors and that they pasteurize human milk. There are health risks, like bacterial contamination, and life-threatening diseases, like HIV or Hepatitis C, which can be transferred through milk. Pasteurization kills these viruses and bacterial contamination.

A study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics found that most human milk purchased over the internet was contaminated with some type of bacteria. The milk purchases over the internet had higher concentrations of contaminated milk than what is found in milk banks. Although some bacteria is safe, even beneficial, at least some of it is considered dangerous for infants.

The study, led by Dr. Sarah Keim, concluded that most of the bacteria found in the milk samples was likely caused by poor pumping, storage or shipping practices.

Kathryn Ellis said she knew there might be some risks with using donated milk, but she trusted that it would be alright. Also, the experience made her feel she had the support from her community, even from women she did not know.

“And for me to be giving him nourishment, which I knew was my job, but to know that there were other moms that had contributed to that,” she said. “I did feel a support of people that didn’t even know us.”

Feeling a part of a supportive community is something expressed by several other women contacted for this story, who donated or used donated milk through Facebook or other social media groups online. Several women said they feel like sharing milk connects them to their Appalachian culture — a culture that believes in the value of leaning on your neighbor or family for help.

But this culture of sharing does not protect against contagious diseases, especially in a region where HIV and Hepatitis C is now on the rise.

“We have no idea what’s in the milk,” said Dr. Stefan Maxwell, the medical director of the Newborn Intensive Care Unit, at CAMC Women’s and Children’s Hospital in Charleston, West Virginia. He warns against feeding babies donated milk from the internet.

“The nutrient value is probably high. But women are exposed to different viruses and bacteria,” he said. “And in this day and age where there’s a high prevalence of Hepatitis C or HIV, and some of these other transmissible  viruses, it’s probably not a good idea to use somebody else’s breast milk, unless they’ve been tested.”

Why NICUs Use Donated Breastmilk

Dr. Maxwell does support the use of donated milk when it is tested and pasteurized. He encouraged his hospital to be among the first in the country to feed donated milk to the most at-risk, premature babies.

The milk they use comes from a milk bank that is certified safe by the Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA). 

Credit Adobe Stock/ Yurii Zushchyk
/
chair and milk pump

Dr. Naomi Bar-Yam is the former president of HMBANA. She also directs a milk bank in Newton Upper Falls, Massachusetts. She said HMBANA requires that all donors are screened, to ensure the breastmilk is safe and free of diseases.

“And we test moms for HIV, Hepatitis B and C, and Syphilis,” Bar-Yam said.

She said last year, they had to turn down more than 20 percent of the women who applied to donate because they did not pass the screening.

Still, thousands of women do successfully donate to HMBANA milk banks, and the numbers are increasing. Most are moms who have surplus breastmilk. Some are moms whose babies died.

“And they are saving lives, in helping others, and they talk about it in terms of this is something my baby and I can do to help others,” Bar-Yam said. 

Credit Adobe Stock/ Yurii Zushchyk
/
breast pump

She said research shows that when NICUs begin using donated milk, more moms actually make the choice to start breastfeeding their own babies.

That is what happened at Dr. Maxwell’s hospital, when they began using donated breastmilk three years ago.

“Well initially I thought we would have a negative response from the parents,” Maxwell said. “And in fact, we’ve had the unintended consequence where mothers who had not intended to breastfeed before, now decided that they wanted to use their own breastmilk.”

And Maxwell sees this as the ultimate goal, that more women, who are healthy, are encouraged to give breastfeeding a try. Because even though donated milk is better than formula, what gives babies the best chance of surviving, and thriving, is almost always their own mother’s milk.

Want to learn how you can donate breastmilk? Most milk banks accept milk through the mail, and will usually pay for shipping. The HMBANA website has a list of milk banks that follow safety guidelines through their organization. Here are some that are in, or close to, Appalachia:

This story is part of an Inside Appalachia Episode about breastfeeding and motherhood.

Working Moms Feel Pressure to Breastfeed, But Struggle Getting the Time and Support to Make it Work

Only 17 percent of Americans have paid family leave from their jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the early 1990s, the Family Leave Act was passed. It requires most employers to offer workers 3 months off after the birth of a baby — both men and women. But here’s the catch, employers don’t have to pay them for the time off.

Also, businesses with less than 50 employees are exempt from the Family Leave Act, so it’s legal for small businesses to fire workers if they take time off after a birth.

What all this means, is many parents — mothers in particular — who can’t afford to take unpaid time off, return to work soon after having a baby.

We don’t know when, on average, women in Appalachia return to work. There isn’t any research on that. But some breastfeeding advocates say they believe a need to return to work quickly may be one of the reasons women in Appalachia are less likely to breastfeed than women in the nation as a whole.

Nearly 900 women answered a West Virginia Public Broadcasting survey about being a working mom in Appalachia. From this, we were able to glean some insight into what working women in our region face, especially when it comes to the challenges of breastfeeding.

  • More than half of the women said they breastfed their babies.
  • More than half also said they received no paid time off work.

Returning to work after giving birth can be hard, regardless of how parents choose to feed their babies.

Kat Biller’s Story

On a Saturday morning in downtown Charleston, West Virginia, people are queuing up at the coffee shop inside a local bookstore.

Kat Biller has worked here for four years.  

Like most hourly workers, Biller didn’t get any paid time off after giving birth to her daughter, Jackie. She said she would have loved more time off, but she couldn’t afford to miss another paycheck.

Credit courtesy Kat Biller
/
Kat Biller with her daughter, Jackie

But she said there are benefits to working for a locally-owned business. Her bosses encouraged her to bring her infant to work. They provided space for her to feed the baby, change her diaper, and they made sure she didn’t work on her own, so that she could step away if she needed to. So four weeks after giving birth, Biller was back behind the register, with her baby sleeping in a sling across her chest.

After a month of working with her daughter at the bookstore, Biller asked if she could work evenings and weekends instead of during the day. Her employers agreed. So, while she was at work, her husband watched their daughter. He fed her the breast milk Biller pumped at work.

Biller said she knows family-friendly work environments like hers are rare. “Were the system as a whole to open up and allow for women everywhere to have even as much opportunity as I had, I think that would be much better,” she said.

Biller said she’s grateful for the flexibility that her job offers. Still, she said she wishes she would have had a few months paid time off to spend with Jackie.

No Paid Leave

Like Biller, many working mothers return just a few weeks after giving birth.

“I’ve had patients that they had the baby on a Friday night, and they had to go back to work on Monday morning,” said Stephanie Carroll, a lactation consultant in southeastern Ohio. Carroll is also the founder of the nonprofit Appalachian Breastfeeding Network, which seeks to increase breastfeeding in Appalachia. She said there’s a lot of pressure on women in our region — both cultural and economic — to go back to work early.

Why Some Women Dread Breast Pumps

Credit Adobe Stock
/
breast pump

 

Pumping breastmilk  which can be stored and fed to babies through a bottle — is an option that a lot of the moms we interviewed said they tried. Some had mixed success and all had conflicting emotions about pumping.

Breast pumps in the United States cost about $200 dollars. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires that most health insurance plans cover at least some of the cost. But while pumping enables working moms to feed their babies breast milk, there are drawbacks.

“It’s very mechanical,” said state employee Caitlin Ashley-Lizarraga. Lizarraga pumped at work until her son Cillian was 10 months old. “You start to feel like you’re a drone in a sci-fi movie or, you know, a post-apocalyptic world.”

Lizarraga just gave birth to her second baby in June. Before her baby was born, we met at a coffee shop one evening after work, and she told me she dreads pumping, even though she loves breastfeeding.

“For me at least, it was a connection to my mother, my grandmother, all the way back. But pumping strips it all away. And you literally feel like you’re just a dairy cow,” Lizarraga said.

She said she and some coworkers hang a sign of a cow over their cubicles when they pump breast milk at work. Often they pump right at their cubicle, so they can keep working, even though there is a designated pumping space at the office. Designated pumping spaces are another part of the Affordable Care Act, the Break Time for Nursing Mothers, that requires employers with 50 or more workers to offer a room and time for mothers to pump breast milk. And it can’t be a bathroom.

Milisha’s Story

But employers don’t have to pay women for the time they spend pumping, so working moms can lose money, or have to stay late to make up the work. That’s what happened to Milisha.

“I don’t think it’s right. I think we should get paid for it.” We agreed not to use Milisha’s last name because she’s worried her employer might fire her for talking to a reporter. She said she had to clock out whenever she took a break to pump.

“Financially I made probably $150 less on each paycheck, because I was pumping. And a lot of people can’t do it financially.”

Milisha works at a call center, And sometimes calls went on so long that she went without pumping. “So sometimes you’d just sit there and you’d be miserable. And that was terrible.”

Not only is waiting to pump  uncomfortable, it can cause an inflammation of the breast, called mastitis.

Inconsistent Pumping Breaks Leads to Lower Milk Supply

Milk works on a supply and demand system, so if women skip a feeding or a pump break, they can lose or weaken their supply of milk, especially in the first few weeks after giving birth.

“Stress itself doesn’t decrease your milk supply, but what it does is it might make you forget or neglect to pump or skip a feed. That’s what causes you to lose your milk supply,” said Dr. Kailey Littleton, a pediatrician and a lactation consultant.

Littleton said the best way to maintain a supply of milk after returning to work, is  to pump regularly, every few hours.

“Which, it’s easy for me to say cause I was in a job where it was respected and honored,” said Littleton. But for women who work in restaurants or gas stations or other jobs with hourly pay, it’s not as easy to take a break every few hours, she said. “They probably would just fire you.”

Littleton said she hears this all the time. “People say, ‘I don’t think my job will let me do it.’ I write letters for moms all the time saying that they are legally required to allow this. I don’t know how effective all of that is, but sometimes it works.”

Even salaried employees struggle to juggle regular pumping schedules, and still, nine years after the Break Time for Nursing Mothers became federal law, not all employers offer women a place to pump milk.

Credit Eric Douglas/ WVPB
/
Reporter Roxy Todd with her 6-month-old daughter

Angela Burkhart’s Story

Former kindergarten teacher Angela Burkhart said during a work training, she couldn’t find anywhere to pump.

“So I had to leave during the morning to go pump, I would pump on my way there, at lunch I would pump, and then I would pump on my way back. And every time I pumped basically in those three days was in my car,” said Burkhart.

These trainings were held at the local high school. She said she felt reluctant to ask for a special room to pump, especially for a training that only lasted a few days. And she said her boss was usually accommodating, and she felt lucky. At school she was given both time and a room to pump. Although, the janitor has walked in on her.

“Like at least a dozen times he walked in, absentmindedly.”

Still, Burkhart said she considers her situation better than what a lot of women face at work. Although she now works a different job, part time for the school system, she said she knows there are other teachers who still struggle to maintain pumping while they work.

Legal Consequences

There have been some lawsuits across the country for breastfeeding discrimination.

In February, a woman in Delaware won a $1.5 million lawsuit against Kentucky Fried Chicken for not being given an adequate place to pump breast milk.  

Of the women who answered our survey, nearly 4 out of 10 said they didn’t feel like they had the flexibility to pump milk after they returned to work. Others feel more fortunate.

“In terms of having paid maternity leave and having a very flexible job, and having an office with a door that closes, and a refrigerator in my office. I’m able to pump at work,” said Molly Clever,  an assistant professor of Sociology at West Virginia Wesleyan college. “And I’m able to have that support in my in my work environment. And I still struggle to do it. So how do women who don’t have that kind of job flexibility, and don’t have that kind of paid maternity leave, how do they do it?”

This lack of support in the workplace may be one reason why so many women stop breastfeeding earlier than they intended. The Centers for Disease Control released a report last year that said “most mothers in the United States want to breastfeed and start out doing so,” but after 3 months, those numbers begin to decline, and only a third continue to breastfeed for a year, which is what the American Association of Pediatricians recommends for all infants.

“How do we reconcile what we tell women is the recommendations of what you’re supposed to do to keep your child healthy, without providing them with any of the support that they need to actually accomplish that?” Clever said.

This story is part of an Inside Appalachia Episode about breastfeeding and motherhood.

The More Money a Mom Makes, the More Likely She is to Breastfeed

In the United States, breastfeeding rates are lower among low-income women and higher among high-income women. This is despite research that shows breastfeeding can provide lifelong health benefits to a baby and potentially save new parents money.

Andrea Reedy is one of nine children. Her mother breastfed Andrea and the rest of them. So when Reedy got pregnant, she wanted to breastfeed too.

“It was just kind of something that I knew was there, knew I was capable of, because I had that example,” she said.

Reedy said breastfeeding was also the cheapest way to feed her baby. When she got pregnant, she was working as a nursing assistant, but the long hours were tough to handle in the later stages of her pregnancy, so she quit. Her boyfriend is a teacher.

“We were just broke,” she said. “Like you couldn’t afford formula, but we weren’t broke enough to have the assistance like the WIC and that kind of stuff, and so I just knew it was something I kind of had to do.”

Reedy and her boyfriend didn’t qualify for WIC, the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. WIC subsidizes the cost of formula. But Reedy had a lot of support from her mom and a friend who is a lactation consultant, and she was able to successfully breastfeed her daughter.

But for many low-income women, it doesn’t turn out that way. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the more money you earn, the more likely you are to breastfeed and to stick with breastfeeding.

“We do know that those that are lower income have less access to care, less access to support,” said Stephanie Carroll, president of the Appalachian Breastfeeding Network. “There could be some addictions, there could be abuse going on in the family, so it’s several things impacting a lower income.”

Carroll said another barrier for lower-income women is the lack of paid maternity leave. “We have a lot of people going back to work early.”

Also women who qualify for WIC are incentivized to feed their babies formula. To qualify for WIC, a family of three must make less than about $39,000 a year.

“When it was started, back in the 70s — when we actually had our lowest breastfeeding rates — they didn’t recognize human milk as food,” said Carole Peterson a lactation consultant based in Indiana who helps train new lactation consultants around the country. She’s also the former chair the National WIC Association Breastfeeding Committee. Instead they viewed formula as food, so it was viewed as giving people containers of baby food.

That thinking has changed in the last few decades at WIC.

“They started realizing, ‘Well, yes, we’re giving formula. Yes, we’re getting rebates on formula. But the optimal nutrition for infants is human milk.’ So they had to make a big change,” said Peterson.

But low-income families had become used to feeding their babies formula, and WIC had developed a reputation as the formula giveaway program.

Here in Appalachia, that’s a lot of infants. About half of all the babies born in West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Kentucky and Ohio are supported by WIC, according to federal data.

Peterson said WIC is implementing a program that will train staff how to support women with breastfeeding in every WIC office around the country.

“Let’s say you decided you were going to breastfeed and you don’t think it’s working, which is 90 percent of what happens,” she said. “And it means when you walk in the door, let me take you to somebody to help you resolve those concerns and help you meet whatever your goals are. And your goals may only be until you go back to work, or your goals may be six months or a year, but you need somebody there to give you the information to meet those goals and not to just offer you formula.”

Peterson said the program should help bridge some of the access-to-care issues that rural, low income women struggle with.

 

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from Marshall Health and Charleston Area Medical Center.

Breastfeeding is Natural, but for Many Women, It's Not 'Easy'

Infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months after birth, says the American Academy of Pediatrics, citing research that says breastfeeding is healthy for infants. It protects against diseases, obesity and stomach issues, helps the mother lose weight, and decreases risk of some cancers. But although breastfeeding is “natural,” for many women, it’s not “easy.”

When Emma Pepper got pregnant, she was totally on board with breastfeeding — until her son was born.

“He could never quite latch properly,” she said. “And he was actually born on a weekend in the hospital and so the lactation consultants weren’t available to support me in the very beginning.”

Pepper lives in Charleston, West Virginia. West Virginia Public Radio reporters called 14 hospitals in the state and only two had breastfeeding consultants available around the clock, even though it’s common for women to struggle with breastfeeding after giving birth.

Unless doctors and nurses have undergone special training, they may not have the expertise to help new moms learn to breastfeed. Only four hospitals in West Virginia require formalized breastfeeding training for nurses and doctors on labor and delivery floors.These hospitals have a “baby friendly” designation from Baby Friendly USA, a World Health Organization and UNICEF program designed to improve the role of maternity services worldwide.

The hospital where Pepper gave birth is not one of the four. Pepper said she was told by a nurse to keep her son for more than an hour on each of her breasts to try to get him to latch. By the time she was discharged from the hospital, she said her nipples were raw.

“It ended up making my breastfeeding experience just more challenging overall,” she said.

A 2013 study published in the journal Pediatrics found that 60 percent of women don’t breastfeed as long as they intend to. This is because of latching problems, concerns about infant nutrition and weight, the need to return to work, or because they don’t have enough support as they try to figure out breastfeeding.

Kailey Littleton, a pediatrician and board-certified lactation consultant in Weirton, West Virginia, said a lot of women she sees have problems breastfeeding.

“Because the information is not great and a lot of the ‘help’ that women get is not the best for them, things tend to go awry,” she said.

Littleton said she hears stories from women about how friends and family or even doctors and nurses have encouraged them to supplement with formula. But supplementing with formula can impact breast milk supply, making it harder to breastfeed. She says many women are also told some pain is normal — but she says it’s not — and that pain is the sign of a bad latch.

When Pepper was discharged, her son still wasn’t latching properly. The doctor recommended she supplement with formula. Pepper was okay with that, but she still wanted to breastfeed. She worried that if she didn’t, her son would be sick more often.

In the meantime, she was being urged on by a lot of people. Her friends, her therapist, even her hairdresser, asked her if she was breastfeeding.

“And so I felt an extreme amount of just societal pressure to be able to live up to that,” she said. “And as a result of that I made some pretty extreme demands on my body in order to be able to fulfill that wish that I had for him.”

Pepper said she spent hundreds of dollars on pumps to increase her milk supply. About a week after giving birth she also connected with a local lactation consultant who suggested a strict regimen: breastfeed, then supplement with formula, then pump to increase milk supply. But Pepper said she was either breastfeeding or pumping around the clock. It wasn’t sustainable.

“I felt such an enormous sadness that I was wearing this pump all of the time, and I couldn’t hold and bond with my baby while I was wearing it, and I only had a limited amount of time for maternity leave,” she said.

After about two months, Pepper would have to return to work. She struggled to breastfeed for six weeks, then the lactation consultant recommended she switch to formula.

“Receiving that advice from her was part of what gave me the confidence to go ahead and switch to formula feeding when I felt I had exhausted every single avenue available to me to make breastfeeding work,” said Pepper.

It’s a decision she said she wishes she had made earlier.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from Marshall Health and Charleston Area Medical Center.

Exit mobile version