House Considers Expanding Photo ID, Citizenship Verification Laws For Voters

West Virginia voters are already required to show some form of identification at the polls to prove their voting eligibility. House Bill 3016 would require that to be a state-issued photo ID — namely, a driver’s license, passport or a resident identification card.

Updated on Friday, March. 21, 2025 at 2:30 p.m.

Some members of the West Virginia House of Delegates want to tighten laws for verifying voter eligibility. But opponents worry that could make the process unnecessarily burdensome.

State code generally already requires voters to show some form of identification at the polls to prove their voting eligibility. House Bill 3016 would require that to be a photo ID — namely, a driver’s license, passport or a resident identification card.

The bill would also require state IDs to denote if a resident is not a U.S. citizen with the word “non-citizen.” The bill is sponsored by Del. Erica Moore, R-Roane, and was discussed by members of the House Judiciary Committee Friday morning.

Proponents of the bill say it could reduce voter fraud, and that obtaining qualifying IDs in the state is already an accessible process. That included Del. Rick Hillenbrand, R-Hampshire.

“Looking at the bill and all the testimony … there’s still several other options for identification,” Hillenbrand said during the committee meeting.

But opponents of the bill like Del. Evan Hansen, D-Monongalia, worry verifying a resident’s citizen status between the secretary of state’s office and department of motor vehicles could be a technically faulty process.

Hansen also expressed concern that the bill would be overburdensome on residents who already have difficulty obtaining or renewing forms of identification.

“I have concerns about elderly people who no longer drive and don’t have a valid passport anymore,” he told West Virginia Public Broadcasting after the meeting. “They’re going to have to travel from a senior living facility to the county clerk’s office to get a new voter ID card with a photo, and that’s not really practical for a lot of our elderly voters.”

Hansen said he worries the bill is part of a broader effort to reduce voting access from some lawmakers.

“The Republican supermajority is pushing a number of bills that make it harder for people to register to vote, harder for people to actually vote, and harder for legally cast votes to be counted,” Hansen said. “I don’t know why they’re doing this. I think one of the most important things about America is preserving people’s access to vote.”

Julie Archer is deputy director of the West Virginia Citizen Action Group, which advocates and lobbies for progressive policies surrounding things like voting rights, environmental protection and health care. Archer attended Friday’s committee meeting and said she worries voters “could be disenfranchised” by the bill’s stipulations.

“We are very concerned about the number of eligible voters who would be disenfranchised, and the barriers it would create, especially for those who lack the necessary documentation for photo IDs,” Archer wrote in a message to West Virginia Public Broadcasting after the meeting.

Del. Josh Holstein, R-Boone, said he wants to further review the language of the bill to ensure that it only applies to those ineligible to vote, and is not overly restrictive to those who are simply not registered to vote. 

“In my opinion, I think we need to add some clarifying language that doesn’t include non-registered voters, but only those that are prohibited from voting,” Holstein said during the committee meeting Friday. “I think that’s the intent of the legislation.”

Members of the committee agreed to table the bill until Monday for further review and possible amendment.

**Editor’s Note: This story was updated to correct Del. Josh Holstein’s first name.

House Says No To Corporate Campaign Contributions

Members of the West Virginia House of Delegates chose to uphold a state policy that prohibits corporations from contributing funds to political campaigns.

In West Virginia, corporations are prohibited from contributing funds to political campaigns. That is a policy members of the West Virginia House of Delegates chose to uphold this week.

House Bill 2719 was voted down Thursday by a vote of 54 to 41, with five lawmakers absent. The bill would have enabled corporations to donate up to $2,800 per individual campaign during an election cycle, plus up to $5,000 per political action committee — private groups that use their funds to promote candidates and pieces of legislation.

Del. Mike Hornby, R-Berkeley, was lead sponsor on the bill, and said his initial intent was to allow minor campaign contributions from businesses.

“I think a candidate should be able to have a business support them in their elections,” Hornby said on the House floor Thursday.

Speaking in favor of the bill, Del. Jordan Maynor, R-Raleigh, noted that several other states currently permit corporate campaign financing, and argued that reporting requirements made the bill more transparent.

Under state law, large campaign contributions generally must be reported to the State Election Commission or the secretary of state. Corporate contributions above $250 would have required donating entities to disclose things like their address and primary type of business.

“This is a transparency bill. This allows your local business [to contribute],” Maynor said.

Del. Mike Hornby, R-Berkeley, was lead sponsor on House Bill 2719, which was voted down Thursday. He is pictured here at a House Education Committee in January 2023.

Photo Credit: Perry Bennett/WV Legislative Photography

But the bill faced a wave of pushback from both sides of the aisle on the House floor. House Minority Leader Sean Hornbuckle, D-Cabell, said he worried corporate involvement would muddy the democratic process.

“No one at home wants more money in politics. We have this fascination with money and greed, and what happens is we don’t get elected officials based upon merit, or what they can do,” Hornbuckle said. “It just becomes a rich man’s game. That’s all it is. So, effectively, we’re not representing the people at home, because it’s going to the highest bidder.”

Del. John Williams, D-Monongalia, expressed concern that there is no limit on how many corporations an individual can create, so individuals could register multiple corporations with the intent of surpassing contribution limits for individual entities.

Speaking on behalf of the House Judiciary Committee, Maynor confirmed the text of the bill did not include stipulations surrounding an individual donating through multiple corporations.

“We just banned food dyes from certain foods. I’m not sure which is more harmful, the dyes in the foods or the money in politics,” Williams said in reference to House Bill 2354, a bill banning certain food additives that passed earlier in the floor session.

Concerns over the bill were also voiced from Hornby’s own party. Del. Henry Dillon, R-Wayne, said he worried companies’ contributions could outpace “the average voter constituent in our districts” who “can’t even begin to afford to part with that type of money.”

Dillon said he found the bill worrisome “when we think about whether or not they’re even considering putting $2,800 toward influencing an election, or whether they’re thinking about putting their $2,800 toward purchasing groceries for that week, or gasoline, or their electric bill.”

Ultimately, concerns over the bill won out. With a majority of delegates voting against it, House Bill 2719 was not communicated to the West Virginia Senate for further consideration Thursday, which would have marked its next step to become law.

Reporter Roundtable Talks Statewide Camping Ban, Addiction And Microgrids

On this episode of The Legislature Today, WVPB reporters Curtis Tate and Emily Rice are joined by Lori Kersey from West Virginia Watch for our weekly reporter roundtable.

On this episode of The Legislature Today, WVPB reporters Curtis Tate and Emily Rice are joined by Lori Kersey from West Virginia Watch for our weekly reporter roundtable.

In the House, delegates passed a bill that would prohibit the use of ranked choice voting in the state. Ranked choice voting is not currently practiced, but Senate Bill 490 clarifies that no state or local elections can use it.

In the Senate, there was a long and contentious debate around laser eye surgery. Briana Heaney has that story.

The Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday afternoon advanced two bills on controversial topics: Senate Bill 264 would reinstate the death penalty in West Virginia, but only for the intentional killing of law enforcement officers and emergency responders. The committee also advanced Senate Bill 474, which would eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs and offices from the state’s executive branch and every level of education.

A Senate Bill, the Riley Gaines Act, has cleared both chambers and is quickly approaching the legislative finish line. Briana Heaney also has this story.

Finally, we have our weekly feature with two West Virginia high school students, Malia Saar and Emma Browning.

Having trouble viewing the video below? Click here to watch it on YouTube.

The Legislature Today is West Virginia’s only television/radio simulcast devoted to covering the state’s 60-day regular legislative session.

Watch or listen to new episodes Monday through Friday at 6 p.m. on West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Senate Advances Bill To Make Electing Judges A Partisan Process

A bill advancing through the West Virginia Senate would reverse a 2015 state law that made judicial elections in the state a nonpartisan process.

West Virginians running for judicial positions may soon be required to list their political affiliations on voters’ ballots, a potential departure from the state’s current nonpartisan approach to these elections that was adopted in 2015.

Senate Bill 521 would require justices for the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, court magistrates and circuit and family court judges to indicate their party membership on ballots for primary and general elections in the state.

The West Virginia Senate advanced the bill — proposed by Sen. Tom Willis, R-Berkeley — to a second reading Friday morning.

Since the state’s 2016 primary election, judge positions in the state have been voted upon on a nonpartisan basis at all levels. Where candidates for the West Virginia Legislature or the governor’s office must indicate their party affiliation alongside their name, no such distinction is required for prospective judges.

West Virginia is one of 13 states across the nation that conducts the election of judges on a fully nonpartisan basis.

Members of the West Virginia Legislature adopted the practice in the 2015 legislative session. Proponents like former Sen. Charles Trump, R-Morgan — who now serves on the state’s Supreme Court — previously said it removed political bias from the electoral process.

“I contend that whether a person is a Republican or Democrat, or a Whig or a Libertarian, or whatever, tells us really nothing about whether that person possesses the qualities and characteristics that we seek and desire in those who hold judicial office in West Virginia,” Trump said on the Senate floor in February 2015.

Senate President Randy Smith, R-Preston, advanced Senate Bill 521 to a second reading Friday, with no discussion on the Senate floor.

Bill Prohibiting Ranked Choice Voting Passes Both Chambers

Ranked choice voting isn’t practiced in West Virginia elections. But Senate Bill 490 clarifies no state or local elections can adopt the process, which allows voters to rank their candidate preferences instead of picking just one.

In recent years, some political organizations and public interest groups have pointed to ranked choice voting as a means of improving elections nationwide and better representing the wants of voters. The practice allows voters to rank their candidates by preference, instead of voting for just one.

But the process has become a point of bipartisan contention, with several Republican-led state legislatures advancing bills that would prohibit the process within their jurisdictions. That debate has spilled over into the West Virginia Legislature in the shape of Senate Bill 490.

The West Virginia House of Delegates on Friday passed Senate Bill 490, which would codify in the West Virginia Code that ranked choice voting is prohibited, and that efforts to adopt the process on the state or local level are void.

The bill had already passed the West Virginia Senate on Tuesday, where it was originally proposed by Sen. Jack Woodrum, R-Summers.

Del. Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha, speaks against the potential prohibition of ranked choice voting in West Virginia on the House floor Friday.

Photo Credit: Perry Bennett/WV Legislative Photo

Ranked choice voting is already not practiced in the state. Proponents of the bill, like Del. J.B. Akers, R-Kanawha, describe it as a “proactive” effort to uphold the integrity of elections in West Virginia.

“We often pass legislation in this body proactively,” Akers said on the House floor Friday. “If we see a problem somewhere else, we try to address it before it’s in West Virginia.”

But opponents of the bill say banning a practice not in place has little effect. Del. Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha, argued that the bill would prohibit a practice that “promotes civility in politics,” and is already used to select committee chairs in the state legislature itself.

“If you’re running against somebody [and] you think that y’all are pretty close there, you want [to be] their voters’ second choice,” Pushkin said on the House floor Friday. “So you’re not going to attack them, because you want their folks to give you their second choice.”

Despite the pushback from Democratic lawmakers, Senate Bill 490 passed the House by a vote of 87-9 on Friday. It now returns to the state’s Senate for a final review, before heading to the governor’s office for approval to become law.

Senators Discuss Opioid Treatment Program Legislation

On this episode of The Legislature Today, legislation to outlaw opioid treatment programs that distribute methadone without offering integrated care in West Virginia, Senate Bill 204, is making its way through the West Virginia Legislature. Emily Rice brings us this story. Also, Assistant News Director Maria Young talks with Sens. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, and Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, about the bill.

On this episode of The Legislature Today, legislation to outlaw opioid treatment programs that distribute methadone without offering integrated care in West Virginia, Senate Bill 204, is making its way through the West Virginia Legislature. Emily Rice brings us this story. Also, Assistant News Director Maria Young talks with Sens. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, and Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, about the bill.

In the Senate, the Government Organization Committee debated Senate Bill 20, which would require funding for increased costs to volunteer fire departments and EMS units.

On the floor of the House of Delegates, lawmakers voted to pass a spate of bills. Among them was House Bill 2117, which would require mail-in ballots to be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day.

And compared to previous years, this year’s legislative session is off to a relatively slow start. However, bills relating to LGBTQ rights and issues have been an exception. Chris Schulz has more on the latest bills to move in both chambers.

Having trouble viewing the video below? Click here to watch it on YouTube.

The Legislature Today is West Virginia’s only television/radio simulcast devoted to covering the state’s 60-day regular legislative session.

Watch or listen to new episodes Monday through Friday at 6 p.m. on West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Exit mobile version