WVU Continues Cuts With Reductions To Library Staff

WVU libraries will be asked to further reduce their budget by up to $800,000 as part of a review of 20 academic support units. 

During a Campus Conversation Zoom call Wednesday morning, West Virginia University announced more planned cuts as part of its continuing restructuring in the face of a $45 million budgetary shortfall. 

WVU libraries will be asked to further reduce their budget by up to $800,000 as part of a review of 20 academic support units. 

Unlike academic units, academic support units are not subject to the Board of Governors’ rules and will not have a chance to appeal.

Mark Gavin, the associate provost for academic, budget, facilities and strategic initiatives, said the cuts will come from reductions in staff positions without disrupting offerings. 

“This sounds like a heavy lift for a unit that has already seen reductions, and it is,” he said.

In June, the university announced libraries would reduce spending on collections by 8 percent for fiscal year 2024. In the same announcement it was noted that the libraries’ personnel expenses have already been reduced by 7 percent.

 “Under its current structure saving $800,000 from the personnel roster would be rather debilitating, but through restructuring efforts, the Dean of Libraries Karen Diaz is confident she can realize these savings without negatively impacting service levels for students, faculty and staff,” Gavin said. 

The university’s recommendation also includes an evaluation of the physical footprint of the libraries, but Gavin said it does not include the closing of any library facilities.

The Teaching and Learning Commons, a unit that provides broad services including classroom support, multimedia production and course and curriculum design support, will have many of its functions moved to other units.

Several positions for instructional designers and multimedia specialists will be moved to the WVU Online unit, as well as micro-credentialing and its related positions. WVU Online’s own recommendation letter states “there is confusion regarding who is responsible and accountable for certain activities/services.”

The management of Zoom and related functions and associated personnel will also be transferred from the Teaching and Learning Commons to an as-yet unnamed unit. 

WVU Press and the Smith Outdoor Economic Development Collaborative received recommendations to seek external funding. In the case of the Smith unit, the recommendation specifies “a plan to  fully shift the unit’s salaries and operating expenses off of University general funds by FY 2026.”

The Women’s Resource Center and LGBTQ+ Center were among six support units that received a recommendation to continue to the current level of activity with no action. The full list of recommendations for all 20 support units can be found on the university Provost’s website.

Gavin apologized for what he called an “unfortunate and unavoidable” pause to the review of academic support units which began in May.

“The portfolio review process ended up demanding the full attention of our office so that we could deliver on the accelerated timeline set by the Board of Governors,” he said. “We had to pause our review of the ASU and recognize that in doing so, we created unrest and uncertainty.”

Reduction in Faculty

Administrators also briefly touched on details of the reduction in force (RIF) process for academic units that were approved to be cut by the Board of Governors on Sept. 15. 

Faculty in the affected units will have until Sept. 30 to complete an “affirmation form” stating their desire to be considered for contract retention. WVU General Counsel Stefanie Taylor said faculty will learn whether the position has been eliminated no later than Oct. 16. 

“The week of October 23rd, we will have due process hearings or meetings for certain types of faculty and classified staff that will be subjected to a RIF,” Taylor said. “On October 30, we’ll let folks know the results of those due process meetings and then December 1 is the last date by which you could sign and return a severance agreement if you were offered one.”

WVU Fields Questions About Program Review, Budget Cuts

West Virginia University’s ongoing review of more than two dozen programs has left many in the school’s community with questions that officials have tried to answer. 

West Virginia University’s ongoing review of more than two dozen programs has left many in the school’s community with questions that officials have tried to answer. 

Monday morning West Virginia University announced that 25 of the school’s academic programs are under review with the possibility of discontinuation. The move comes amidst a financial crisis at the university, which last month announced $7 million in staffing cuts.

Monday afternoon, during a meeting of the West Virginia University faculty senate, faculty were given the opportunity to ask questions directly of university leaders including Provost Maryanne Reed and President Gordon Gee.

Daniel Totzkay, senator for the Eberly College of Arts & Sciences, asked where the process was headed.

“What is the specific vision for who WVU will be that the leadership has as a goal or eventual destination?” Totzkay asked.

President Gee said moving forward, the university was focused on being student centered, reaffirming its identity as a land-grant institution and differentiating WVU from other institutions of higher education.

“The vision for us is to be a very, very clearly focused institution on the things that we do well, the things that we need to do well and ultimately, the opportunity for us to really make a very clear difference in winning hearts and minds of the people of our state and if we do that I think will be will be will be an institution that is greatly valued,” he said.

Totzkay asked if Gee was implying that the university didn’t already focus on students or its land-grant mission.

“The students, when you take a look at the survey, they believe that we still need to do a lot more to engage with them personally, and to be engaged with them, not for our convenience, but for theirs,” Gee said. “And I hate to use this word, but the students are our customers. And we need to accept that as a responsibility.”

Tuesday morning the university published an open letter from the president, outlining a vision of an institution “that meets the needs of industry and our communities, while ensuring that we are differentiating ourselves in a competitive landscape.” 

That includes a vision of WVU “as one of the elite R1 institutions in the country – emerging as a global leader in the areas of astrophysics, neuroscience, energy and sustainability, cancer prevention and treatment, and artificial intelligence and robotics.”

Stefania Staniscia, senator for the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources & Design asked about the impact of cuts to the library budget on current students and faculty, as well as future applications.

WVU Libraries announced their spending on collections will be reduced by 8 percent in 2024. Those cuts include subscriptions to certain academic journals and a pause on new acquisitions. 

“Will the lack of WVU faculty access to the most recent books and journals affect WVU research standings?” Staniscia asked. “Will persons responsible for the WVU budget consider transferring funds currently designated for athletic programs to academic programs, such as the library, in order that the university preserve its reputation as a leader that successfully educates undergraduate, graduate and medical students?”

Provost Reed responded by saying her office and the library system have been in contact about how to best serve the WVU community with a reduced budget.

“I’m pretty confident that we’re going to be able to serve most of the needs of our students and our faculty in doing so, but we have a budget challenge and we have to address that,” she said. “We’ve talked about the impacts that this is going to have on our personnel, and so we’re really looking for every opportunity to be efficient, but I do believe that our library’s going to be doing a very good job.”

Not asked in the formal conversations hosted by the university this week, but featured repeatedly on social media, is the question of why the focus has fallen so heavily on academic programs. 

“We have bought 24 hospitals,” Gee said. “We have created a health system that is one of the best in the country in a very short period of time.” 

But those purchases are an expense critics now question given the university’s $45 million budget deficit.

During a media availability Tuesday afternoon, WVU officials emphasized that the university’s academic transformation has been ongoing for more than a decade. Mark Gavin, WVU associate provost, acknowledged that the process has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“If you look over the last 10 years, while our colleges have seen some budget reductions and have adjusted to them, the non academic side of the house has also seen appreciable staffing reductions over time,” he said. “While it looks like the majority of the effort is focused on the academic side, and the colleges in particular, if you look at it over a longer timeframe, that’s not necessarily true. It’s taking a more balanced approach.”

Gavin says it is unclear what kind of financial impact the program review process will ultimately have.

The next step in the review process will be a Program Review Self-Study, where Deans and chairs of the identified programs will seek input from faculty and staff to be submitted to the provost’s office by Aug.1. 

Recommendations for cuts will be made the week of Aug. 11 and then it will be up to the Board of Governors to confirm them in September.

Any layoff notices will be sent to individual faculty and staff the week of Oct. 16.

WVU Center Lands Another Grant To Digitize Newspaper Archive

A project to digitize historical newspaper archives in West Virginia has landed another grant.

The West Virginia University Libraries’ West Virginia & Regional History Center received a nearly $202,000 grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to keep digitizing newspapers published in the state from 1790 to 1923. It’s the fifth grant contribution from the National Endowment for the Humanities, bringing the group’s total contribution to the center’s efforts to $968,000.

The West Virginia center so far has contributed 400,000 pages from more than 50 historic newspapers to the Chronicling America website . The grant will allow another 100,000 pages to be added.

This round of newspapers focuses on the Civil War and the West Virginia Mine Wars.

Wiki Gender Gap to Be Discussed in Morgantown

Where Are All the Women? Wikipedia’s Gender Gap” That’s the name of a panel discussion that will be hosted at West Virginia University. 

Wikipedia. It’s the free, online encyclopedia that taps into the wellspring of public knowledge; it’s designed to be written and edited … by the public.

“That’s kind of the amazing thing about Wikipedia — it’s the end result of human curiosity,” said Wiki Education Foundation spokesperson Eryk Salvaggio.  

But here’s the thing: 90 percent of contributors to the online encyclopedia are men. That’s according to Salvaggio and several sources. In fact, it’s a well-documented conundrum. 

In a New York Times article last year Kat Stoeffel wrote that “Wikipedia famously bears one of the starkest gender gaps in contemporary culture.”

[Wikipedia] is a lopsided, Axe-scented version of the world, one where Sex and the City has fewer citations than a single character from Grand Theft Auto. – Kat Stoeffel/New York Times

“When mostly men are contributing to Wikipedia,” Salvaggio said, “it tends to make a lot of strong, quality articles on things that men traditionally are interested in. So for example military history is great on Wikipedia.”

But women authors? Female scientists? Biographies? Articles on these subjects are shorter, or altogether absent. 

The problem with this picture is that about 15 million internet users turn to Wikipedia EACH DAY. 450 million users a month. Most assuredly less than 90 percent of them are men. Why such a gap?

“Well you’d have to ask a woman who doesn’t edit Wikipedia,” Salvaggio said.

It’s the million dollar question being discussed this week in Morgantown.

EVENT DETAILS

The free and public event is sponsored by the Reed College of Media, and WVU Libraries.

The panel will discuss what can be done to bridge the gap. Join in the conversation on twitter: #WikiGenderGap  

Wednesday, March 4 at 7:30 pm G20 Ming Hsieh Hall, WVU, Morgantown, West Virginia

Panelists:

  • Adeline Koh — Co-founder of The Rewriting Wikipedia Project (@adelinekoh)
  • Jami Mathewson — Educational Partnerships Manager at the Wiki Education Foundation
  • Sydney Poore — Wikipedian-in-Residence at Cochrane Collaboration (@SydneyPoore)
  • Frank Schulenburg — Executive Director of the Wiki Education Foundation (@fschulenburg)
Exit mobile version