League Of Women Voters Helps Everyone Prepare For The Polls

Citizens across the country are preparing to go to the polls in the coming days. But finding information on candidates and ballot issues can be difficult.

Julie Archer, president of the League of Women Voters of West Virginia, spoke to reporter Chris Schulz about resources her organization has created to help voters make more informed choices.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Schulz: What is the League of Women Voters?

Archer: The League of Women Voters, we’re a non partisan political organization that encourages informed and active participation in government. And we work to increase understanding of major public policy issues through education and advocacy, but our core mission is educating voters and helping them make their voices heard in our elections.

Schulz: How long have you been with the League of Women Voters? 

Archer: I have been with the state league for about six years. I guess I should say, I don’t know if this matters, but we’re affiliated with the League of Women Voters of the United States. And the league has affiliates, I think in most of the states across the country. But our, our league is all volunteer. There are state and local leagues that have paid staff, but here in West Virginia, we’re an all volunteer organization.

Schulz: You mentioned that your objective is voter engagement. Can you tell me a little bit more about how the organization achieves that?

Archer: Putting out voter guides is one of the primary ways we seek to engage voters. But we also have three local leagues in West Virginia, and they host candidate forums and debates in their areas. And we also do voter registration.

Schulz:  Why is there such emphasis on voter education and voter information? Why isn’t it just enough for voters to be engaged? 

Archer: We feel like one of the most important things that voters need to do ahead of going to the polls and casting their ballots is researching the candidates and where do they stand on the issues that matter to the voter? And what are their plans to address challenges and problems that are facing our state and our nation. It’s important for voters to feel confident going to the polls. And I think one of the reasons that a lot of people don’t participate is because they don’t feel informed. They don’t feel like they know enough about the candidates. We’re trying to help them make them feel more confident and make informed decisions when they go to cast their ballot.

Schulz: Tell me a little bit about the voter’s guide. I understand this is a national project, but tell me a little bit about the voter’s guide and how you contribute to keeping local voters informed.

Archer: Vote 411, it’s not new. It’s something that’s been around for a while. But for our state League, this is the first year that we’ve participated in trying to help contribute information about state and local candidates. I should think when it comes to voters doing their research to learn about the candidates, sometimes that’s easier said than done. Especially for the down ballot races, maybe in more rural areas where they don’t have a local newspaper. The purpose behind Vote 411 is to kind of try to be a one stop shop for voting information. Not just like ‘Where do I go vote?’ but learning about the candidates. And so we were really intentional. We had a committee of our members that live in different parts of the state, and we really put a lot of time and thought into coming up with questions for candidates that were both office specific, but also trying to give the candidates an opportunity to speak, really speak to issues that are of importance to our communities.

Schulz: And how are you able to do that? Did you send out questionnaires? How were you able to provide people with that information?

Archer: Fortunately the Vote 411 platform made it really, really easy for us to reach out to a lot of candidates. We had to get all of the candidate contact information but the platform, on the back end of it, makes it really easy to reach out to those folks. It was primarily email contacts, the primary way we reached out to the candidates.

Schulz: Does that also include issues? I know that we have an amendment  up on the ballot this year in West Virginia. Is that something that you all or the system helps people reach a decision on before they go to the ballot? 

Archer: We do have some information on Amendment One on the site. I guess I would say we are a non-partisan organization, and that we don’t endorse or support candidates, but we do take positions on issues, and the League did make the decision to come out in opposition to Amendment One.

Schulz: I think you spoke to this already to a certain extent. But for a state like West Virginia, why do you think it’s so important to have this national resource and the Vote 411 system available to West Virginia voters?

Archer: I feel like speaking from my own personal experience as somebody who lives in a more rural area, it’s just very hard to get information, especially about those down ballot, more local races. One of the big races on the ballot, I think in all  55 counties this year is county commission but it’s just really hard to find information about those candidates. And the other thing that we found through doing this, putting together this voter guide and reaching out to those candidates – and we’ve been really pleased with the response that we’ve gotten – we feel like they appreciate the opportunity to let voters know about themselves, because those races also just, they just don’t get that much attention. Everybody’s focused on the presidential race, or, like the other races at the top of the ticket, but it’s like, the further down you go those races just don’t get as much attention.

Schulz: So how would you recommend, or how does the League of Women Voters recommend that people utilize this resource before they go to the ballot?

Archer: It does help voters to get personalized voter information. Basically, you go to the site, and you put in your address, and then it helps you populate a ballot based on that. And it goes through, office by office, and you can compare candidates’ positions, and it lets you send stuff to yourself, so you can have that as a reference. But there’s a lot of good information there, and we feel like the most valuable thing is being able to go there and see the responses from the candidates in their own words.

Schulz: Is there anything else that I haven’t given you a chance to discuss with me, or something that we have discussed that you would like to highlight?

Archer: One thing I was gonna mention, because part of making a plan to vote is, you know, researching the candidates. And I thought we might also just talk a little bit about voting options. Fortunately in West Virginia people don’t have to wait until November 5 to vote. We do have early voting, which is underway. There’s early voting in all 55 counties and for some voters absentee voting is an option. You have to meet the eligibility requirements, but for folks who are home bound, or they’re not going to be home because of work or school, we really encourage them to look into absentee voting. Although the time is short on that, but folks can still apply for an absentee ballot up until Oct. 30.

Really the first, the very first step when you talk about making a plan to vote is getting registered or checking or updating your registration. But unfortunately in West Virginia, if they didn’t get registered before that Oct. 15 deadline, they’re not going to be able to vote in this year’s election. But half of the states across the country allow voters to register and vote on the same day, either during early voting or on election day. And that’s something that we would really like to see in West Virginia, in terms of making voting more accessible to folks who maybe they’ve registered at one point, and then they didn’t vote and they may not know that if you don’t know, under West Virginia law, you can be removed from the voter rolls just due to inactivity. We have a lot of options in West Virginia, but there’s also a lot more we could do to encourage and increase participation.

Medically Assisted Death Is On W.Va.’s Ballot This November

On the ballot in November, West Virginia voters will decide whether or not to change the state’s constitution to prohibit medically assisted suicide.

Updated on Saturday, Oct. 5, 2024 at 9:40 a.m.

This November, West Virginia voters will decide whether or not to change the state’s constitution to prohibit medically assisted suicide.

While West Virginia’s Amendment 1 lumps “the practice of medically assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person” together, they are different practices.

Assisted dying can take two forms: euthanasia or assisted suicide.

Euthanasia requires a physician to take an action to cause a patient’s death, typically a form of lethal injection. Euthanasia is not legal in the U.S., with the exception of capital punishment in the 27 U.S. states that allow the death penalty.

For an assisted suicide, a physician will prescribe a lethal prescription for the patient to self-administer whenever and wherever they choose.

Assisted suicide is legal in ten states and the District of Columbia. Internationally, the practice is legal in several European countries, Canada, Columbia and parts of Australia.

Requirements differ, but generally, individuals must have a terminal illness as well as a prognosis of six months or less to live to be eligible.

A 2022 study found 74 percent of medically assisted deaths in the U.S. had a diagnosis of cancer and 87 percent were enrolled in hospice or palliative care.

Assisted suicide is already illegal in West Virginia, but Del. Pat McGeehan, R-Hancock, believes the prohibition of the practice should be enshrined in the constitution of the state.

“Medically assisted suicide and euthanasia against men and women is storming the Western world, all we have to do is take a look at northern Europe, Canada and the 10 other states where it’s already legal,” McGeehan said. “It’s growing at an exponential rate, and it’s really a horde nihilistic phenomenon that most people aren’t aware of yet, and that was one of the reasons, because we really need to secure our state against this going forward in the future.”

During the regular session of the legislature, McGeehan, a sponsor of the resolution that turned into Amendment 1, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 4 that he was inspired to push for this constitutional prohibition after a constituent called and asked him to legalize medically assisted suicide in West Virginia.

McGeehan testified that he declined the request, but maintained correspondence with the constituent and tried to convince them not to travel to another state to carry out a medically assisted suicide.

Rusty Williams, the ACLU of West Virginia’s interim advocacy director, takes issue with McGeehan’s response to his constituent.

“The important part of the conversation is [that] our lawmakers are, they’re running counter to what we want,” Williams said.

The constituent eventually traveled to Oregon and passed away, spurring McGeehan into action.

Some lawmakers were concerned the resolution might prohibit capital punishment should it become legal in West Virginia. Therefore, the resolution was amended to include the caveat, “Nothing in this section prevents the State from providing capital punishment.”

When asked by lawmakers on the committee why he wanted to enshrine this prohibition into law, McGeehan said he and his fellow lawmakers will not always be in power, and he wants to prevent future lawmakers from legalizing the practice.

“The thought process is that we’re not always going to be here, and I don’t want to see in 10 years, suddenly this culture invade West Virginia like it has some of our border states already,” McGeehan testified.

On July 26, the ACLU of West Virginia published its opposition to Amendment 1, calling it unnecessary. Williams finds the proposed amendment deeply concerning.

“Our constitution exists to protect and expand rights, and I find it incredibly concerning that this is to take away a future right,” Williams said. “Medical aid in dying is already illegal in West Virginia. There’s already a statutory prohibition here. So enshrining it into the constitution, to me, runs counter to why the constitution exists in the first place.”

Williams said popular opinion in West Virginia might change, as it has nationally. A 2018 Gallop poll found that 72 percent of Americans support allowing terminally ill people to seek medical assistance in ending their own lives.

“A no vote doesn’t make any immediate changes to the lives of patients,” Williams said. “They’re still not going to be able to access this right because of the statutory prohibition. A yes vote just means that we are going to make it harder for legislatures down the road to again, if the will of the people changes.”

On Sept. 16, the League of Women Voters of West Virginia released a statement urging voters to reject Amendment 1.

“West Virginia already has laws on the books having to do with this,” said Judy Ball, chair of the League’s Legislative Action Workgroup. “This is not something new. That’s one of the problems with this amendment is it deals with issues that we already have dealt with in statute, and then it’s written in extremely vague terms, possibly to confuse the voter.”

Ball also said the league opposes Amendment 1 as it relates to capital punishment.

“The other thing is this amendment includes this reference to the death penalty, another thing that’s already in West Virginia law,” Ball said. “It was prohibited by West Virginia law going back to 1965, the league also opposes the death penalty. Why that’s in here? I have no idea, but it suggests that, to me, it suggests that what’s written into this amendment isn’t really what it’s about.”

Ball said she believes Amendment 1 is about control and an attempt by the government to intervene in decisions that should be personal.

“The legislature wants the government to control your life, to practice medicine without a license, and to intervene in places they don’t belong,” Ball said.

McGeehan believes that medically assisted suicide creates a setting where pressure is placed upon the elderly and disabled to see themselves as a burden.

“We want to send a signal to the rest of the country that we’re not going to stand for this nihilism and this dystopian nightmare that’s rapidly spreading across our country to save health care costs by killing the elderly, and we want to ensure that it never gains a foothold here in our state in the future, we want to send a signal that this should be the gold standard,” McGeehan said.

Election Day is November 5th.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting with support from Marshall Health.

Editor’s Note: This story was updated to include the source for McGeehan’s statement about saving health care costs.

W.Va.’s Legislative Scorecard And A Look At Compassion Fatigue On This West Virginia Morning

On this West Virginia Morning, we speak with Judy Ball, chair of the Legislative Action Workgroup for the League of Women Voters of West Virginia, to break down the state’s 2024 Legislative Scorecard. Also, we hear an excerpt from our Us & Them episode, “Compassion Fatigue.”

On this West Virginia Morning, the League of Women Voters of West Virginia has released their 2024 Legislative Scorecard. It compiles the votes from all delegates and state senators on 26 bills that became law to give an idea where they stand on issues.

Judy Ball, chair of the League’s Legislative Action Workgroup, spoke with Government Reporter Randy Yohe on the scorecard results.

Also, in this show, many communities see people turning away from homeless shelters to temporary encampments. Nonprofit agencies and government programs struggle to support a vulnerable population with complicated needs. 

At a recent AP award’s event, the Virginias AP Broadcasters acknowledged an Us & Them episode focused on homelessness with a second place for Best Podcast. In that episode, host Trey Kay talks with Barbara DiPietro, the director of policy for the National Health Care for the Homeless Council. We listen to an excerpt.

West Virginia Morning is a production of West Virginia Public Broadcasting which is solely responsible for its content.

Support for our news bureaus comes from Shepherd University.

Chris Schulz produced this episode.

Listen to West Virginia Morning weekdays at 7:43 a.m. on WVPB Radio or subscribe to the podcast and never miss an episode. #WVMorning

Exit mobile version