Gas Group’s Chief Talks About MVP, Carbon And Coal Competition

Curtis Tate spoke with Charlie Burd, president of the West Virginia Gas and Oil Association, about the state’s role in supplying the global market.

The United States exported a record volume of natural gas in 2023, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Curtis Tate spoke with Charlie Burd, president of the West Virginia Gas and Oil Association, about the state’s role in supplying the global market.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Tate: Who are the biggest natural gas players in West Virginia? Where does the gas go?

Burd: We have two of the largest natural gas producers in the country operating in West Virginia. Actually, EQT is the largest natural gas producer in the country. And Antero resources is the largest natural gas producer in West Virginia. And I believe I heard the number that about a third of our production here in the state, and we produce just less than 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It was 2.8 in 2022. And I’ve heard during the legislative session, that number may top 3 trillion for 2023. I haven’t seen those numbers yet. Because the reports aren’t due until like April, mid-April, but about a third, I believe, of our production is transported east to be converted into liquefied natural gas to be shipped across the oceans to our allies.

Tate: Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, was a game changer. When did production take off?

Burd: I think the first well was drilled in December of 2007, put into production in 2008. That was a Chesapeake well. We produced 256 (billion cubic feet) of natural gas. And now we’re producing round numbers that say 3 trillion cubic feet. So that’s where it started. And that’s where we are. And it has greatly increased from year to year. That 3 TCF, 96 percent of that comes from probably about 4,600 horizontal wells in 2022, 2.85 trillion cubic feet from 4,500 wells. And I think we’ve added about 100 wells. I won’t have the exact numbers for a couple of weeks. That’s where it all came from.

Tate: Where is the production concentrated?

Burd: If you were to look at a map of West Virginia, and look at I-79, which literally dissects the state almost straight up the middle of north and south. When you get to about Braxton County, and it all goes to the northwest. That’s where the wet play is. That’s where the more enriched natural gas with propane and ethane is, if you’re again using that as a kind of a guide, using 79 as a guide, anything to the east of 79 is pretty much in a dry play. It’s almost pipeline quality gas coming out of the ground there. 

Tate: What’s the difference between wet and dry gas?

Burd: Wet gas has the heavier hydrocarbons: propane, ethane, butane, isobutane. And what we call dry gas would be that gas stream that is just mostly methane. So in addition to methane, those other heavier hydrocarbons are what we delineate as a wet gas. And we produce somewhere in the neighborhood of 700,000 barrels of ethane and liquids a day in that northwestern tier of the state. And those products are extracted through two or three large processing facilities we have up in that also in that same general area. Those liquids are sent south and north, south into Louisiana and north into Canada to be further processed. Or put in a pipeline and shipped to where those liquids are used.

Tate: What does the Mountain Valley Pipeline mean for gas producers in West Virginia?

Burd: That pipe is what they call fully subscribed. Meaning that the end users that have already subscribed or purchased will be purchasing that gas in long term, fixed contracts for that natural gas. But it means a lot to us because it’s literally, probably one of the last major pipelines that may be built. And for West Virginia, unlike Texas, and other places that can move a lot of gas across their state and be intrastate, our situation is much different. We have to ship our gas out of state where there are markets. West Virginia is small in comparison to other markets. So our gas is moved through interstate pipelines out of the state.

Tate: Why is MVP one of the last major pipelines to be built?

Burd: I think you just look at the extraordinarily difficult process someone has to encounter to design and construct a pipeline in this country now, it’s almost impossible. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which was a Dominion project, another 2 BCF a day that would have gone to eastern markets and military use. That project got scrapped a couple years ago. Because, the cost overruns, and just the increased scrutiny of us to have a line crossing 200 feet under the Appalachian Trail. Not impacting the trail at all, but just because it, quote-unquote, “crossed underneath.” that there was a lot of outcry. 

Tate: Burning natural gas emits carbon dioxide and producing and transporting gas releases methane. Both are greenhouse gases. What is the industry doing to reduce those impacts?

Burd: Number one on our own, several years ago, the industry took upon itself to develop a program internally to reduce methane emissions. And here in the (Appalachian) basin, there’s lots of smaller conventional wells. And now in addition to the bigger Marcellus wells, we’ve reduced our carbon footprint here by something like 70 percent, over the last 10 years, just on initiatives, initiatives of our own, and then we get new legislation that says we have to do more. I mean, I think we’re still in the process of completing what we started on our own. Secondly, the methane that comes off of fugitive emissions that we would have when wells are put in, put into service, and methane doesn’t stay hovering over West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. It goes way into the atmosphere. And there’s no question that if this administration is serious about reducing global emissions, no one produces natural gas more safely, or efficiently, or environmentally sound. And we do that we do right here in this country. No one has the exacting standards for environmental and safety as the United States does.

Tate: Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia have moved sharply away from coal and toward natural gas for electricity in the past 10 to 15 years. Why hasn’t West Virginia?

Burd: Well, it’s not because of lack of effort to develop natural gas fired electric generation. We have tried, and there have been numerous projects that have been placed upon the table. I think, Curtis, choosing my words with you carefully here, we have a state that has historically believed its reliance on energy and jobs came from the coal industry. But at the hands of the EPA and others, this constant demand to reduce emissions, and produce energy cleaner has transformed all those states you mentioned to producing electricity with natural gas. West Virginia’s a bit behind, but it’s not because we’re not trying. It’s just that we find ourselves in a better place. Literally, every day when it comes to being able to compete for those projects evenly with all the same playing field with Ohio, Pennsylvania. I mean, you’re right, Ohio and Pennsylvania collectively have maybe two dozen plants, two dozen natural gas fired electric generation plants. We literally have one down there in Huntington.

Mountain Valley Pipeline Gets Big Push In Debt Ceiling Bill

A provision in the debt ceiling bill heading to the U.S. House of Representatives includes language that would expedite the final permits for construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

A provision in the debt ceiling bill heading to the U.S. House of Representatives, called the Fiscal Responsibility Act, includes language that would expedite the final permits for construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline

Once it is completed, the pipeline will move natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica shale deposits in West Virginia to North Carolina. The 304-mile pipeline is being held up by a 3.5-mile segment where it crosses the Jefferson National Forest. 

Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., along with Rep. Carol Miller, R-W.Va., have supported the pipeline and worked to get the permits approved. 

According to Manchin, the pipeline will put about 2,000 people to work building the pipeline, although it is unclear if those are jobs at one time or cumulative over the entire course of construction that was done in phases. 

“I’ve been told it’s about $40 million a year in tax revenues to the state of West Virginia,” Manchin said. “And about $300 million a year in revenue to the royalty owners.”

Environmental groups have opposed the pipeline, and it has faced court challenges since 2015. Manchin said the provision in the debt ceiling bill will put an end to all of that, requiring judges to dismiss any pending litigation and forcing any new lawsuits to the U.S. Court of Appeals in the D.C. Circuit

Earlier this year, West Virginia Coal Association President Chris Hamilton said he opposed the pipeline out of concern that it would displace coal-fired electricity generation at four power plants in North Carolina. 

“I don’t know why coal and gas are going after each other when everybody else is going after both of them,” he said. “They should join forces that show, between coal and gas, 60 percent of the energy product provided in this country comes from those two sources.” 

Federal Report Touts Appalachian Gas Storage Hub

 

A new report fedeal report finds developing ethane storage in Appalachia could provide a boost for the entire petrochemical industry.

The report, asked for by members of Congress and released Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Energy, examined the feasibility of developing underground storage and distribution infrastructure for ethane, a natural gas liquid brought up during shale drilling and a key feedstock for most plastics.

 

The findings were praised by Energy Secretary Rick Perry, who added that the Trump administration also supports ethane storage in the region.

 

“There is an incredible opportunity to establish an ethane storage and distribution hub in the Appalachian region and build a robust petrochemical industry in Appalachia,” he said, in a press release. “As our report shows, there is sufficient global need, and enough regional resources, to help the U.S. gain a significant share of the global petrochemical market. The Trump Administration would also support an Appalachia hub to strengthen our energy and manufacturing security by increasing our geographic production diversity.”

The Marcellus and Utica shale formations, located under West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania, are ethane-rich, and the agency estimates the largest growth in natural gas liquids production is expected from this region.

 

“Ethane production in Appalachia is projected to continue its rapid growth in the coming years, reaching 640,000 barrels per day in 2025 – more than 20 times greater than regional ethane production in 2013,” the report states.

 

Developing a natural gas liquid storage “hub” is critical to growing the plastics and chemicals industries.

 

Some storage capacity is under development in the region.

Energy Storage Ventures LLC is developing the Mountaineer NGL Storage project. When completed, the project would store 2 million barrels of ethane, butane and propane in four underground salt caverns on a 200-acre site, about a mile north of Clarington, Ohio, on the Ohio River.

Another high-profile public-private natural gas liquid storage project is also in the works. The Appalachia Storage and Trading Hub cleared its first major hurdle earlier this year when it got approval for the first of two phases for a $1.9 billion U.S. Department of Energy loan.

Republican Sen. Shelly Moore Capito of West Virignia priased the report’s findings in a tweet.

“This is something I have long advocated for & something I believe could be a game-changer for #WV & our economy,” she wrote.

DOE said building underground storage and distribution in Appalachia could benefit the entire industry and offer a “competitive advantage,” in part because it would diversify where ethane is stored geographically.

Currently, the bulk of America’s petrochemical industry and 95 percent of ethane storage is located near the Gulf Coast, which makes it vulnerable to climate change and extreme weather events.

The report focused largely on the economic benefits of ethane storage and did not examine the environmental costs, or factor in how increased flooding across Appalachia due to climate change might affect ethane storage or a petrochemical system.

Environmental groups say ethane storage and any petrochemical industry buildout in the region jeopardizes the region’s air and water quality and would negatively impact public health.

W.Va., Ohio, Pa. Form Agreement To Grow Shale Gas Industry

West Virginia has joined Ohio and Pennsylvania in an effort to grow the shale gas industry on a regional level. An agreement solidifying that partnership was signed Tuesday, Oct. 13, in Morgantown.

The agreement spells out four main areas that the three states will work together on to grow the natural gas industry: Marketing, workforce development, infrastructure and research.

“We have so many universities, great universities – WVU, Pitt, Carnegie Melon, Ohio State, Cleveland State – who are looking at all these different issues, doing all kinds of research on it,” Vision Shared president and CEO Cory Dennison said. “We’re going to be getting them working together and collaborating together and then taking that information and then benefiting from it.”

Vision Shared is a nonprofit that focuses on economic development in West Virginia and was one of the groups that brought leaders from the three states together.

West Virginia Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin signed Tuesday’s agreement, along with Ohio Lieutenant Governor Mary Taylor and Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolfe, during the Tri-State Shale Summit in Morgantown. The summit bills itself as bringing industry leaders together to discuss opportunities in the Marcellus and Utica shale regions.

Tomblin said you don’t often hear about the Texas or Louisiana oil and gas industries on their own, but you do hear about the Gulf Coast as a region. He said it’s time for the tri-state area to market itself in a similar way.

“I think it’s very important that we work as three states, or as a region that has the gas in common, to promote the Appalachian Basin as a good place for companies to invest in our region and to create jobs here,” Tomblin said.

That regional approach also applies to growing the natural gas industry workforce. Dennison said that when companies think about moving into a region, they look to see how many qualified workers are available nearby.

“When you put a 50-mile radius, a 100-mile radius and a 250-mile radius over most of the large cities in West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio, you’re going to be crossing state lines. So for the workforce effort, I think that’s really where we can collaborate together as three states,” he said.

The agreement says each state will pay for its own expenses in meeting their common goals and  will automatically renew every year until Dec. 31, 2018.

Watch the 2015 Tri-State Shale Summit

Watch the Tri-State Shale Summit, a collaborative effort on behalf of Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia to bring together industry leaders to facilitate a discussion on the opportunities in the Marcellus and Utica shale regions.

The summit features engaging and enlightening panels and keynotes on topics such as regionalism, research and innovation, manufacturing, and workforce and education.

With a focus on cooperation and agreement, the three state governments will establish a foundation for the future of the oil and gas industry in the tri-state area, with a focus on opportunity specific to you and your company.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgJeI-ShWSk

Companies Bid Millions to Drill Under State Lands in W.Va.

Companies have bid millions of dollars to drill for oil and natural gas beneath several state-owned lands in West Virginia.

On Friday, the state Department of Commerce opened bids for Marcellus shale fracking under several tracts of land.

Antero ResourceFish s bid about $8,100 per acre, or $2.3 million total, for mineral rights under Jug Wildlife Management Area in Tyler County. Jay-Bee Production Company bid between $5,000 and about $16,300 per acre for different parts of the same land.

Noble Energy bid about $5,100 per acre, or $685,000 total, to drill under Fish Creek and adjacent land in Marshall County.

StatOil USA Onshore Properties Inc. bid $9,000 per acre to drill under part of the Ohio River in Wetzel County.

The state requires an additional 20 percent royalty on what’s extracted.

Exit mobile version