Spousal Sex Abuse Fully Criminalized, Marking ‘New Day’ For Survivors

Gov. Jim Justice signed a law on Friday eliminating marital exemptions for sex abuse. Advocates say the new law will help survivors pursue legal recourse for their experiences with spousal abuse.

In West Virginia courtrooms, marriage no longer qualifies as a legal defense for sexual abuse.

Gov. Jim Justice signed Senate Bill 190 into law Friday, removing all remaining marital exemptions for crimes of sexual violence.

Previously, state law blocked spousal prosecution over acts classified not as sexual assault, but as “sexual abuse” — namely non-consensual sexual touching.

Exemptions like these were even steeper decades prior. Spousal rape was not a criminal offense in the state until 1976.

That’s when former Sen. Judith Herndon, R-Ohio, then the only female state senator, called for changes to the state’s sex abuse laws that were later adopted by the West Virginia Legislature.

With spousal sex abuse now fully criminalized, state officials and community advocates alike have expressed hope that more support for survivors lies ahead.

Becoming Law

Marital exemptions for sex abuse have long been a concern of advocates for the survivors of domestic violence.

“This was definitely not new to this session. I’ve been working in advocacy full time for the last eight years, and I know that it’s been in conversation for as long as that,” said Sara Belvins O’Toole, director of development with Branches Domestic Violence Center.

Based in Huntington, Branches provides housing support to victims of domestic violence across five West Virginia counties.

This year, however, discussion over the statute grew in February, as members of the West Virginia House of Delegates debated the so-called “Women’s Bill of Rights.”

That bill aimed to define sex-based terminology in state law, and create protections for “certain single sex environments.”

Opponents of the bill described it as discriminatory toward transgender residents. Del. Kayla Young, D-Kanawha, introduced an amendment with several new provisions to exemplify “what [it] could look like if women had equal rights under the law.”

That included removing sales taxes on period products, establishing parental leave for state employees — and removing marital exemptions for sex abuse from state law.

Young’s other ideas were shot down. But one part of her amendment ultimately passed: removing the marital rape exemption.

The Women’s Bill of Rights, and therefore Young’s amendment, did not become law. But the possibility of removing marital exemptions grew as the session wore on. 

A bill proposed earlier in the session by Sen. Ryan Weld, R-Brooke, passed through the West Virginia Senate later in February, then the House in March.

And, on Friday, Justice signed Weld’s bill into law.

Supporting Survivors

At a Feb. 23 Senate Judiciary Committee meeting, Gabrielle Mucciola, prosecuting attorney for Monongalia County, attested to the bill’s importance for supporting survivors of domestic violence.

“These cases are wildly underreported,” Mucciola said. “And I would say that this exemption creates just another hurdle for victims of sexual abuse and sexual assault to come forward and feel comfortable that West Virginia adequately protects them.”

“You can imagine the heartbreak that a survivor might feel if they’re going through the legal process and, all of a sudden, because they were married to that person, what happened to them is not validated,” Belvins O’Toole said.

With the bill passed, advocates for survivors of domestic violence say they expect these barriers to reporting sexual violence will be reduced.

“Hopefully… people understand that this is an option for them now,” said Julie Britton, director of the YWCA Resolve Family Abuse Program in Charleston. Britton’s group offers housing and emergency interventions for survivors of domestic abuse.

Belvins O’Toole said the new law ensures that people are equally protected from sexual violence.

According to her, reducing barriers to prosecuting sexual violence is especially important because it expedites a process that can be difficult for survivors. “Most importantly, this is a win for survivors,” she said.

Britton agreed, expressing hope for a better future for survivors across the state.

“I just think that this is a new day for West Virginia,” Britton said. “It’s just another tool that we can use to make sure survivors get the justice that they absolutely deserve.”

Community Air Monitoring Data Would Be Inadmissible In Proceedings Under House Bill

A bill under consideration in the West Virginia House of Delegates would disallow community air monitoring data from being used in legal or regulatory proceedings.

A bill that received committee support in the West Virginia House of Delegates Tuesday would prevent publicly sourced air pollution data from being used in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings.

House Bill 5018 was drafted in response to the rise of community air monitoring in West Virginia. This refers to pollution data collected by members of the public, as opposed to governmental agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Proponents of the bill said it would ensure that air pollution data used in legal or regulatory proceedings meet standards set by accredited state and federal agencies.

But, at a meeting of the House Committee on Energy and Manufacturing, some lawmakers voiced concerns that the legislation would limit residents’ abilities to identify and substantiate air pollution concerns.

“I’m not a massive fan of this bill,” said Del. Kayla Young, D-Kanawha.

“I think more community air monitoring is a good thing, not a bad thing,” she continued. “We shouldn’t be hurting our citizens and getting rid of transparency. So, I’m a no on this one.”

Young said that lawmakers have not done enough to invest in air monitoring, despite recent EPA funding allocated to the state for these projects.

Still, the bill received support from a majority of committee members, who referred it back to the House with the recommendation that it be passed.

“Community monitoring is not forbidden by this bill at all,” said Del. Mark Zatezalo, R-Hancock, who sponsored the bill. Zatezalo added that the pending legislation would simply set a standard for what quality of data is admissible to official proceedings.

“Good data and better, supportable data is important for ongoing analysis,” he said. “I have a hard time trying to figure out why that is a big, big problem.”

Update: Legislators Hear Update On PSC Fire Hydrant Investigation

Legislators heard an update about the Public Service Commission’s statewide investigation into the maintenance and testing of fire hydrants at Monday’s interim meetings. 

Updated on Tuesday, Aug. 08, 2023 at 10:15 a.m.

The deadline for municipalities and water districts to file reports on the maintenance and testing of their fire hydrants was extended to Aug. 25 in an order issued Monday evening by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia.

“Despite the considerable number of entities that failed to respond, only a handful of entities contacted the commission to request additional time to provide the requested information,” the order said.

The order goes on to note that maintaining accurate and up to date records should be “business as usual” for a public utility and that information pertaining to utility facilities, including information regarding fire hydrants is required annually in the reports water utilities must file.

“We consider this to be a front and center public safety issue for which timing is of the essence and further delay is unacceptable,” the order said.

The order makes it clear there will be no additional extensions granted for any reason, and the PSC will proceed with appropriate actions to advise or direct utility action to protect the public health and safety.

Original Post:

Legislators heard an update about the Public Service Commission’s statewide investigation into the maintenance and testing of fire hydrants at Monday’s interim meetings. 

At the end of June, the PSC initiated a general investigation and required all 301 of the state’s utilities that own fire hydrants, or that serve private fire hydrants, to report certain information including the number of hydrants owned or serviced, their age and maintenance schedules and practices by July 28.

However, during the Monday meeting of the Joint Standing Committee on Technology and Infrastructure Jonathan Fowler, PSC engineer, told lawmakers that only about half of utilities have responded.

“The water utilities have never been asked to report anything other than the number of hydrants in their annual reports,” he said. “What we’re trying to do now is to develop a more comprehensive database to reflect the industry standard on maintenance and testing of these hydrants.”

According to Fowler, there is a national standard that specifies that fire hydrants should be inspected annually and should be flow tested either every three years or every five years. 

“We are trying to determine how many utilities comply with that standard,” he said.

Fowler said he has been pleasantly surprised at the number of smaller utilities that have written fire hydrant maintenance procedures and documentation.

Del. Kayla Young, D-Kanawha, said she was intimately familiar with why the investigation is happening, in reference to a fire in May that burned down a Charleston house where firefighters could not find a functioning hydrant. 

“Half of these water utilities are not in compliance,” she said. “What do you do if they don’t respond? These people’s homes are potentially in danger, so how do we best protect our constituents?”

Fowler said there will be a further order issued by the PSC requiring those to respond. 

“And I would suppose after this second notification, there may be an additional action by the commission,” he said.

Del. Adam Burkhammer, R-Lewis, asked if there was a plan to replace inoperable hydrants after the data collection process was concluded.

“Utilities are supposed to repair and maintain their system in accordance with the standards,” Fowler said. “For small utilities costs can be a deterrent.” 

He went on to explain that new hydrants being installed on existing lines can cost between $10,000 to $13,000. He explained that hydrants are robustly designed and are designed to be maintained for 100 years. 

“We have a few in this state that are over 100 years old. The majority from what I’m seeing in the data responses are less than 50 years old, and you can still get all the parts you need for those,” Fowler said. “So it gets back to an issue of requiring the utility to better maintain the hydrants. We had one utility responded that seven fire hydrants in his system are so old, he’s afraid to open them because he can’t shut them back off. So this is the kind of thing we’re getting. It’s an important public safety question.”

Fowler said once the PSC has received all the information from utilities it will be able to formulate an appropriate response.

Exit mobile version