New Parenting Series Kicks Off With Discussion On Changing Medical Advice 

In the first installment of a new series called “Now What: A Series On Parenting,” reporter Chris Schulz sits down with Dr. Adriana Diakiw, an assistant professor of pediatrics at West Virginia University (WVU), to discuss how things have changed and what doctors recommend today.

Discussions between grandparents and new parents reveal just how much advice around what’s “best for baby” has changed in just one generation. From sleep positions to even clothing and nutrition, what’s recommended, or even considered safe, has shifted more than many realize.

In the first installment of a new series called “Now What? A Series On Parenting,” reporter Chris Schulz sits down with Dr. Adriana Diakiw, an assistant professor of pediatrics at West Virginia University (WVU), to discuss how things have changed and what doctors recommend today.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Schulz: Best practices for taking care of newborns, for infants, has changed quite a lot in the last 30 years, and maybe even a shorter amount of time. Why has that change happened? Why has so much changed around best practices for infant care?

Diakiw: The answer is simply based on the evidence. Over the last 30 years, we have learned so much about the best way to take care of newborns. One of the things that here at WVU, and I think sort of more globally, that pediatricians like to practice is what we call evidence-based medicine. And the recommendations for newborn baby care are based on what we consider the best evidence, and that is constantly changing and evolving. And we have learned so much, not just in the last 30 years, but even in the last 10 years, about the best way to feed and care for babies.

Schulz: Let’s get into some specifics here. I’m a new parent myself, and when I speak to even my parents, so just, you know, one generation back, there are things that I tell them that we do now that they say, “Oh, well, we did the exact opposite when you were a kid, and you turned out fine.”

Let’s start with sleep. Why is the back the best position for an infant for sleep?

Diakiw: Being on the back is the only safe sleep position for an infant. It is true that throughout all the generations, our parents, perhaps our grandparents, everyone was taught to put their baby to sleep on their tummy. It is true that in general, babies are somewhat more comfortable on their tummy. They might even seem to sleep more comfortably on their tummy. And I think that’s why going back for generations our parents and grandparents were taught that.

However, around 30 years ago, we learned that babies who are put to sleep on their tummy have about a 50 percent increased risk of dying of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, or SIDS. That evidence is so strong that the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a recommendation and a campaign called the “Back to Sleep” campaign that sought to educate parents that one of the most important things that they can do for their newborn baby’s health is to always put them to sleep on their back.

Schulz: Why did it take so long for this evidence to be collected? 

Diakiw: I think that in medicine, just as in society, we do tend to get set in our ways. That is why as physicians, we are constantly reexamining and reevaluating. We’re asking ourselves, “Well, if we do a certain intervention, like if we lay a baby to sleep on their tummy, or on their back, why do we do that? And what’s the evidence for why we do that?” 

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome has been, in pediatrics, one of the most challenging issues to deal with both for physicians and for parents, because simply by definition, a baby who passes away of SIDS, there is no cause that can be identified. That’s part of the definition. Looking back at the evidence in these cases, researchers were trying to tease out what factors could possibly have contributed to that infant’s unexpected death. The one variable that stood out amongst all the others was the position in which the baby was placed to sleep the last time. That emerged gradually in a retrospective way, which means looking back at previous cases, and the evidence was so clear, and so compelling, that the American Academy of Pediatrics pioneered almost a sea change in how we care for babies. 

One of the most important things we do for babies is how we put them to sleep. If you ask any new parent, the baby’s cycle of sleep and nap and waking is one of the most important things in their life. And, as you might expect, it was very difficult, at first, to change public opinion and to change practice, particularly when it’s embedded in generations of family practice, of cultural practice, cultural tradition, and years of advice that had been given to parents and grandparents by their own doctors and pediatricians. It really was almost like a campaign to try to change practice.

Schulz: Feeding. If sleep is one of the most important, feeding is probably the most important, especially if you ask the infant themselves. Today, we are told that milk or formula is the only thing that you can give a child. No water, certainly no honey. Why is the focus on milk or formula only now?

Diakiw: When we refer to milk, of course, we’re speaking of human breast milk. So mom’s breast milk, which is the best way of feeding an infant. It’s based on the evidence, and mom’s breast milk has such a tremendous variety of health benefits, we couldn’t list them all during this talk. If we’re not going to be taking mom’s breast milk, then infant formula is the only safe way to feed your baby between birth and 12 months.

Schulz: Can you explain a little bit more about why an infant can’t have water or honey or cereal mixed into their milk to quote unquote, help them sleep through the night?

Diakiw: Starting with water, if a baby gets too much water mixed in with their milk or their formula, the way that a baby’s kidneys work, the baby can actually get sort of water overloaded. Even mixing a little bit of extra water into formula, for example, diluting the formula, parents do it for various reasons. One of them is sometimes because they want to extend, formula is very expensive, and so they think, “Well, if we just watered down the formula a little bit, it’ll go a little bit farther.” But that can have really negative health consequences for the baby, because the way that the baby’s kidneys work and their fluid balance works, they can’t just get rid of that extra water so easily. It can have some pretty negative health effects for the baby. 

On the topic of why we shouldn’t have honey before 12 months of age, that one has to do actually with risk of botulism. Honey can have little spores in it that are perfectly safe for toddlers or older children. But in babies, because of the special way that a baby’s immune system works, sometimes the spores that are in that honey can cause a very serious illness in the baby. We avoid giving honey until we’re certain that the baby’s immune system is more than strong enough to handle it. That would be right at one year of age, that’s the age where we pretty much feel comfortable feeding any food to a baby. 

Schulz: One of the ones that frustrates young parents the most, just because I think there’s an understanding that it is well intended, is temperature regulation. I’m talking about grandparents, parents, aunts, uncles, being very insistent that a baby must have a hat on at all times, even if you’re in an 80 degree room. Socks, mittens. 

Talk to me a little bit about what the modern recommendations are towards ensuring that a baby is at a comfortable temperature.

Diakiw: This is a topic that I can relate to very well. Culturally, in my family, my parents both emigrated from Ukraine after World War II. They were absolutely convinced that not just cold air, but even a draft in the house, could cause serious illness like a cold or even pneumonia in a baby. My parents’ generation and grandparents were very insistent that the room be kept very warm for babies, and that not even a draft of cooler air could come into the room. They were also firmly convinced that if a child went outside, in even slightly cool air not thoroughly bundled in three layers of jackets and a hat and mittens and boots, that they might be more likely to get sick. 

What the evidence shows, Chris, is that is absolutely untrue. In fact, the opposite is true. With newborn babies in particular, it’s very important to avoid overheating or over-bundling a newborn baby because overheating is one of the biggest risk factors for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), apart from being placed to sleep on your stomach. I can’t emphasize enough how important it is to avoid overheating a newborn or an infant.

Schulz: One of the things that has always stood out to me as I’ve learned more and more about infant care is the issue of colic. It is this very generalized term that seems to kind of brush away a very concerning set of symptoms for infants. A lot of discomfort for not only the infant, but obviously their parents and their caregivers have to deal with that, [and] can last for months at a time. 

What can you tell me about how the pediatric field’s perception or understanding of colic is changing even as we speak?

Diakiw: Our perception of colic has changed dramatically over the past several years. So this is a field in which there’s a lot of active research. It’s one that I think we could talk about for quite some time. But in simple terms, parents typically think of colic as abdominal discomfort, or tummy troubles. A lot of parents will say they feel that colic is an excess of gas, or that the baby is having trouble digesting their formula, because the symptoms include crying, squirming. Sometimes babies will draw their legs up towards their abdomen, and they may grunt or push and they may seem to pass a lot of gas. Colic had for generations been understood as abdominal discomfort. There are cases in which a baby’s discomfort is absolutely due to excess gas, or perhaps a formula intolerance or perhaps acid reflux. 

But there’s another definition of colic, which actually has nothing to do with tummy pain or with pain at all. That interpretation of colic, which we don’t quite have a separate word for yet, we now understand as more of a developmental process. We think of a baby when they’re born full-term as really having been born three months too early. This is the idea of the fourth trimester. Babies, when they’re first born, and in order to even be able to pass through the birth canal, a baby has to be born about three months earlier than their brain and nervous system is really ready to face the world. As a result, the baby’s parent or caregiver acts almost like an external nervous system for the baby during the first three months.

Human babies are unique in the animal kingdom really, in being utterly helpless when they are born. They depend on their parents for everything. And newborns have absolutely no ability to self-soothe. That’s because during that first three months, their brain and nervous system is so immature, and it’s growing and changing so rapidly, that a baby can easily become overstimulated with all of the sound and light and color, the music, the new faces, family members, pets, all of these things in a baby’s changing world, all of which are new, can sometimes almost overload the baby’s developing brain. 

As a result, usually towards the evening, the baby will start to cry inconsolably. When we’ve looked at babies who have this unexplained crying, which we also call colic, we found that these colicky babies actually are not in pain. We can test for this actually, they’re not in pain at all. It’s more that their nervous system is so overstimulated that the only way that they can express that overstimulation is with this inconsolable crying. And it’s kind of a tough thing to wrap your mind around when you’ve always been taught that your baby’s unexplained crying is because they have excess gas or colic or tummy pain.

Schulz: My partner was quite insistent when I told her that I was coming to speak to you that I ask about infant probiotics. Is that something that you would recommend to a patient? Is that something that has even been studied? Because I know that probiotics for adults are questionable. So where do probiotics, and other supplementary products for infants, land for you?

Diakiw: Right now, I would not recommend giving probiotics to any infant, unless it was at the specific guidance of your own doctor or pediatrician. And most specifically, infants who are premature, their immune systems are not quite as strong. Because probiotics aren’t very well regulated, there have been instances where probiotics were given to premature babies or babies that didn’t have a well-developed immune system where they caused harm. Right now, until we have more evidence, more data, and perhaps better regulation of probiotics, sort of at the level of perhaps the FDA or government agencies, I would not recommend giving probiotics to an infant, except in cases where your doctor or a specialist recommends it.

Schulz: There’s so much research going on, with regards to infants, that I feel we could spend the rest of the day and then probably many days sitting here talking. Are there any other topics or any of the topics that we’ve already touched upon that I haven’t given you a chance to discuss, that you think is important for me to know? 

Diakiw: So on the topic of temperature regulation for babies and as pediatricians we recommend that the baby’s environment and the room in which they sleep be kept at a pretty steady temperature, and we’ve come to a conclusion that somewhere between 68 degrees and 72 degrees is the perfect temperature for babies. When in doubt about whether to add another layer of clothing to your baby, or perhaps to leave it off, if you’re ever in doubt, the best advice is leave that extra layer off. Or another good way to think of how bundled your babies should be, is, however many layers of clothing you’re comfortable in. You can add one more thin layer of clothing for your baby, but no more.

New Report Details Poor Infant And Maternal Health In W.Va.

A new report from the March of Dimes shows West Virginia’s already high preterm birth rate is rising.

West Virginia earned an “F” on its March of Dimes report card for infant and maternal health. 

The national percentage of preterm births (PTB) is 10.4 percent, while West Virginia’s rate is 13 percent.

The World Health Organization defines PTB as babies born alive before 37 weeks of pregnancy are completed.

Many factors can contribute to PTB including smoking, hypertension, unhealthy weight and diabetes.

The infant mortality rate in West Virginia increased in the last decade. Infant mortality is defined by the CDC as “the death of an infant before his or her first birthday.” In 2021, 117 babies died before their first birthday in West Virginia. 

The Medical Director of West Virginia University’s Neonatal ICU, Autumn Kiefer, said the report shows the state has more work to do to improve outcomes.

“I think there is a need for education of the community in general about things like what preterm labor looks like, what can be done in a healthcare setting to help treat and improve outcomes for moms that do experience preterm labor or have a history of preterm birth,” Kiefer said.

Outcomes are even worse for babies born to Black birthing people. The PTB rate for Black babies is 1.4 times higher than the rate among all other babies while the infant mortality rate among babies born to Black birthing people is 1.6 times higher than the state rate.

According to the report, from 2019 to 2021, the leading causes of infant death in West Virginia were birth defects, PTB or low birth weight (LBW) and maternal complications.

“Making sure that folks are aware that if they have that concern that they could be in preterm labor or if they’re not feeling well, and there’s different with the moms with preeclampsia, all kinds of reasons that they may need to deliver preterm,” Kiefer said. “It’s so important to get checked out because there are things that can be done for mom and baby that can improve the chances of a good outcome is born preterm.”

The primary causes of infant mortality include birth defects, preterm birth and low birth weight, sudden infant death syndrome, accidents and injuries, and maternal pregnancy complications, according to both the CDC and March of Dimes.

In West Virginia, unhealthy weight was reported in 42.9 percent of all births and smoking in 17.9 percent of all births.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, from 2018 to 2021, 25.4 per 100,000 births resulted in the death of the birth giver during the pregnancy or within six weeks after the pregnancy ends. 

The March of Dimes also reported that West Virginia also has inadequate prenatal care. According to the report, almost 13 percent of birthing people received care beginning in the fifth month or later, or less than 50 percent of the appropriate number of visits for the infant’s gestational age.

The March of Dimes concludes the report by listing policies and funding that would improve and sustain maternal and infant health care. West Virginia does not have paid family leave or a doula reimbursement policy. 

“The March of Dimes has suggestions of some additional legislation that can be helpful, based on current national information, like more options for paid family leave,” Kiefer said. “In general, having a new baby is a stressful experience and so having a family feel like they’re supported and have a means to bond with baby and have time to put things in place to get a good system going can help on the infant mortality side of things.”

The state’s expansion and extension of Medicaid scored well alongside a maternal mortality review committee, fetal and infant mortality review and a federal perinatal quality collaborative.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting with support from Charleston Area Medical Center and Marshall Health.

Advocates Discuss Black Infant And Maternal Health With Lawmakers

The Black Infant and Maternal Health Working Group hosted a breakfast and meet and greet with lawmakers Monday at the capitol.

The Black Infant and Maternal Health Working Group hosted a breakfast and meet and greet with lawmakers Monday at the capitol.

The event brought together advocates, affected community members, health professionals, and policymakers to address Black infant and maternal health outcomes in West Virginia.

Representatives from Black by God, the Black Voter Impact Initiative, the Morgantown/Kingwood NAACP, Morgantown NOW, the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy and TEAM for WV Children participated in the breakfast.

Attendees heard from experts like Health and Safety Net Policy Analyst Rhonda Rogombe with the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy.

“The most recent multi-year data showed that Black babies were twice as likely as their white counterparts to die in their first year of life in West Virginia, and that’s an unacceptable statistic,” Rogombe said.

According to the March of Dimes the number of preterm births between 2019 and 2021 in West Virginia was higher for Black infants, at 17.6 percent compared to 12.4 percent for white babies.

Preterm birth is a high indicator of risk, but West Virginia law currently does not allow the mortality review team to interview the family of an infant or mother who dies, which limits the scope of the information they collect, according to Rogombe.

“What really started the spark to the national conversation around this is that Black and indigenous women were facing mortality rates two to three times more than their white peers in that first year after giving birth,” Rogombe said. “That has only been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. And so, without that knowledge on the state level, we really don’t know what that looks like, but given the other health indicators that our Black population often faces, we can reasonably assume that the issue is worse for Black West Virginians as well.”

Rogombe said more data collection and the sharing of that data by race in a timely fashion would give a more complete picture of Black infant and maternal health outcomes in West Virginia.

“When controlling for variables like income, education, and other pieces, we still see Black women facing higher rates of mortality than their white peers,” Rogombe said. “All of those things mean that in West Virginia, we really, really need to address this issue and, and just ensure that moms and babies live.”

Attendees had the opportunity to share their stories with lawmakers directly at Monday’s breakfast. Some have lived experience of racial discrimination in maternal health, like Elizabeth Anne Greer Mobley.

“I have a master’s degree plus 42 credits. That still did not save me from suffering horrific miscarriages, from suffering from catastrophic and well catastrophic in the sense that I hemorrhaged, my children ended up in a PICU, NICU,” Mobley said. “It just does not protect you in the state of West Virginia from having horrific and challenging medical situations when there’s Black racism ingrained within the maternal and infant medical industry.”

Mobley moved from Maryland to Martinsburg with her family when she was 14. She calls herself a “Black-alachian.”

“I claim West Virginia, I have been here for 18 years, my babies, I’m giving birth in West Virginia, educated in West Virginia, I stayed in West Virginia, I have a 501(C)3, and an LLC,” Mobley said. “I’m proud to be here. I’ve stayed here, but you don’t want me. You don’t want my children’s or my life, the lives of me or my children are not worthy.”

In addition to being involved in her community in Martinsburg, Mobley is also a foster parent for the state. She said she attended the breakfast at the capitol so that no one else has to go through what she has gone through.

“I don’t know what it’s gonna take or what I’ve had to say or what all I have to give to make the story palpable enough for us to impact and affect will change,” Mobley said. “Because what I went through should never happen again, and yet it did.”

Rogombe said improvements could be made by prioritizing families in the upcoming 2024 legislative session.

“Creating pathways for midwives and doulas to be reimbursed by health insurance companies so that pregnant people have options in terms of what their care looks like,” Rogombe said. “Things like paid family and medical leave so that people can recover, you know, deepening our, the wealth of resources around mental health. There is a broad range of options and the more that we prioritize families, whatever that looks like, the better our outcomes will be.”

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting with support from Charleston Area Medical Center and Marshall Health.

Meeting Challenges To Improve W.Va. Infant And Maternal Mortality Rates

Addressing the West Virginia Legislative Interim Committee on Health Monday, Dr. Angela Cherry is with the West Virginia Perinatal Partnership Advisory Council, a public private collaborative dedicated to improving health outcomes among pregnant women and babies.

Addressing the West Virginia Legislative Interim Committee on Health Monday, Dr. Angela Cherry is with the West Virginia Perinatal Partnership Advisory Council, a public private collaborative dedicated to improving health outcomes among pregnant women and babies.

Cherry first laid out the medical and social challenges, beginning with where West Virginia stands on a national scale.

“We have the fourth highest low birth weight, the tenth highest very low birth weight, the fourteenth highest teen birth rate, the eighth highest infant mortality and twentieth highest maternal mortality rate.” Cherry said. “We are having an increase in our maternal deaths according to accidental drug overdoses, which I’m sure everyone knows.”

Cherry pointed out racial disparities with a significantly higher infant mortality rate for Blacks and Hispanics. She also noted the birthing center ‘deserts’ in West Virginia.

“We have 20 birthing hospitals with one free standing birthing center,” she said. “With obstetrical deserts in West Virginia, women are having to travel really far, sometimes up to two hours, to get to these hospitals that are doing these deliveries.”

Cherry listed the many initiatives underway to improve mortality outcomes for infants and mothers, including monitoring a hospital’s levels of care to make sure that they are at the appropriate level of care and treating the patients that they should. There’s a project to reduce the incidence of very low birth weight infants born outside of tertiary care centers and a quit-nicotine-cessation project because of the high risk of smoking and preterm births.

Cherry made special note of the relationship between rampant, statewide substance use disorders and pregnant women.

“Drug Free Moms and Babies is a program that addresses those issues, a program that deals with care coordination including prenatal care, postpartum care and routine OB care,” she said.“ In addition to that, let’s add the care coordination for all the other services that moms may need. They need outreach, for communities to do a needs assessment to see what they actually do need in their communities. They need follow up referrals; home visitation; WIC support, housing; childcare; transportation, all of those things.”

Dr. David Didden, Medical Director of DHHR’s Office of Maternal, Child and Family Health also addressed and took questions from the interim committee.

Following up on a statement from Cherry, Del. Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha, noted a 2020 report from WVU Medicine that Black infants died at almost twice the rate of white infants in West Virginia.

Didden said the problem is well known and being addressed.

“We’re working with organizations that historically have reached out into the African American community in West Virginia. Based on experiences in the pandemic and working with the Dunbar School Foundation in Fairmont, we are hoping to get more information, qualitative data from the minority communities, and to be able to find out just what services are needed,” Didden said. “One of the promising practices we’re looking at is establishing through our home visiting program, a Doula Network. Doulas are birth attendants; birth assistants, knowledgeable in prenatal care, knowledgeable in labor and delivery. At least, we can step up and create a demonstration project in some of our hardest hit communities. We’re aware of the disparities, working with our academic partners, who are also studying this and moving forward.”

Sen. Hannah Geffert, D-Berkeley, asked Didden about the challenge in recruiting doctors following the state’s abortion ban.

“One of the one of the problems we’re having in our area is we can’t get OBGYN’s to move into our state because they have fear of what this body might do to doctors who are performing abortions. For example, lose their medical license for doing that,” Geffert said. “I’m not quite sure why people assume that, that’s exactly what’s going to happen, but they can’t even get hired headhunters to get OBGYN’s to come to our community.”

Didden said West Virginia has suffered a medical provider shortage for years, especially with OBGYN’s.

“If we’re able to activate our nurse midwives, and successfully recruit more obstetricians to the state, I think that partnering with local organizations that like the Perinatal Partnership, we can send the message that we are in support of reproductive health for women, and that this is a promising place to come and practice medicine,” Didden said. “It’s a tough sell. We’re going to continue to try to establish best practices and standards of care, and I hope we’ll be able to convince some more providers that this is a good place to practice medicine. The distance to a birthing hospital is a major issue. So we’re going to continue to work with with the perinatal partnership to try to solve some of these problems and come up with some structural changes that I’m hopeful we’ll activate more local resources, get nurses and other members of the care team practicing at the top of their license, so that rather than having to transport someone, two hours to get an evaluation done, we may be able to provide those resources more closer to home.”

WVU Program to Reduce Infant Mortality Receives 5.5 Million to Continue Work

A West Virginia program designed to reduce infant mortality has received almost 5.5 million dollars in continued federal funding for the next five…

A West Virginia program designed to reduce infant mortality has received almost 5.5 million dollars in continued federal funding for the next five years.

The Healthy Start Appalachian Parents and Infants Project aims to reduce preterm labor and low birth weight babies by focusing on improving health for women and families. Initiatives include screening and counseling for depression, alcohol, tobacco and other drug use, breastfeeding support, and parenting support.

The program is administered by WVU and WVU Medicine and funded by the federal Health Resources and Services Administration.

The goal of Healthy Start is to serve communities with infant mortality rates at least 1.5 times the United States national average and with high rates of other poor maternal and infant outcomes. The continued funding will allow the WV program to expand from 8 counties to 9.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from Marshall Health and Charleston Area Medical Center.

Infant Mortality Disparity Grows in Appalachia, Study Finds

Placing much of the blame on smoking, a study chronicling the ongoing health crisis in Appalachia has concluded that the 13-state region suffers from a…

Placing much of the blame on smoking, a study chronicling the ongoing health crisis in Appalachia has concluded that the 13-state region suffers from a growing disparity in infant mortality and life expectancy, two key indicators of “a nation’s health and well-being.”

The study, published in the August issue of Health Affairs, compared infant mortality and life expectancy rates in Appalachia with the rest of the United States between 1990 and 2013. It found while the rates were similar in the 1990s, by 2013 infant mortality across Appalachia was 16 percent higher than the rest of the country while life expectancy for adults was 2.4 years shorter.

While the region has been the focus of the opioid epidemic in recent years, the study found one of the biggest culprits was likely the prevalence of smoking and the region’s tendency to be “more accepting of tobacco use as a social norm.” Gopal K. Singh, a co-author of the study and a senior health equity adviser with the Health Resources and Services Administration, noted nearly 20 percent of Appalachian women report they smoked during pregnancy. In the rest of the country, it’s 8 percent.

“Smoking takes a tremendous toll on the health of Appalachians,” the authors wrote.

The study used the federal Appalachian Regional Commission to define the region, which covers 428 counties across 13 states. It includes all of the counties in West Virginia along with some counties in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.

Heart disease, cancer and other respiratory illnesses were among the leading causes of death throughout the study period, all of which can be caused by using tobacco. Kentucky and West Virginia have some of the highest smoking rates in the nation coupled with some of the lowest cigarette taxes.

In Kentucky, state lawmakers passed a law requiring health insurance companies to cover tobacco cessation medications that have been approved by federal regulators. But they failed to pass a bill that would have banned tobacco products from public school campuses. Just 36 percent of Kentucky’s 173 public school districts ban all tobacco products on campus and at school-sponsored events.

“What this report shows is the extreme damage tobacco is causing our people and how we are getting hammered by it worse than any other place in this country,” said Ben Chandler, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

The study found that drug overdoses accounted for 6.3 percent of the life expectancy gap between 2009 and 2013, and it was a likely explanation for why the life expectancy of white women declined between 1990 and 2004 while increasing among white women among the rest of the country.

Singh noted the study only includes data through 2013. Since then, drug overdose deaths in Kentucky and elsewhere have soared because of the availability of heroin and fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that is much more powerful than heroin.

“The contribution of drug overdoses could be higher for the most recent time period,” he said.

Other causes included accidental deaths, such as car wrecks. The study noted 30 percent of “unintentional injury deaths” in Appalachia are from car wrecks, which “contributes substantially to the life expectancy gap.”

Exit mobile version