Feds Approve State To Issue Permits For Carbon Storage Wells

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last week approved West Virginia’s application to permit what are known as Class VI wells.

This will enable the injection and underground storage of carbon dioxide captured from power plants that burn coal and natural gas as well as other carbon-intensive industries.

Carbon capture and storage could help power plants that burn fossil fuels meet new EPA limits on carbon dioxide emissions. Those rules have been challenged in court, and the incoming Trump administration has pledged to roll them back.

Still, West Virginia’s senior U.S. Senator, Shelley Moore Capito, said in a statement that the permitting approval would help protect the state’s baseload power. 

“I have frequently said that the states are better suited than Washington to carry out this authority and get these projects up and running,” she said. “Those on the ground, who understand their states best, are far better positioned to make these decisions, and it’s past time that West Virginia finally has this ability.”

Capito took the gavel last week as chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Nearly 90% of West Virginia’s electricity is generated by coal, and at least one large-scale natural gas power plant is planned with carbon capture and storage.

AG-Elect McCuskey Talks Federal Regulation, Rightsizing

West Virginia’s Auditor J.B. McCuskey will become the state’s Attorney General in January.

Statehouse reporter Caelan Bailey spoke with McCuskey about how he plans to follow Morrisey’s legacy, his career as a lawyer and delegate, and priorities for the incoming administration as a member of the incoming Board of Public Works.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Bailey: As auditor, you established the West Virginia checkbook website for fiscal transparency. How do you see government transparency fitting into your role as attorney general?

McCuskey: I view government transparency as a baseline duty of public officials. The taxpayers are our bosses. They are also the stockholders in the company that pays us, if you will. And so for me, the idea that bureaucracies hide what they’re doing, and when the government hides its functionality and its actions from the public, it leads to enormous problems. 

As we’ve seen, the national debt at the federal level just absolutely explodes. I think a lot of that can be tied back to the fact that our federal government and Congress, in many ways, doesn’t allow taxpayers to truly see how they’re funding programs, why they’re funding programs, who is getting government contracts, and how much they’re being paid and so, you know, just as an aside, I’m very excited to see how the DOGE sort of committee works.

Bailey: You mentioned DOGE federally. During the campaign, now-Governor-elect Morrissey mentioned rightsizing frequently. How do you see that fitting into West Virginia government, and any efforts the Attorney General’s office might have in that?

McCuskey: So when you look at where West Virginia is today, we live in a world where very frequently, when a government program is not producing the results that it’s supposed to, they will come to the legislature and say, I can’t do this because I don’t have enough funding. And that, in my mind, is a lazy explanation for poor results. 

What rightsizing is really about is determining how much something is supposed to cost, not how much it cost last year, and then adding to it. We believe, both Patrick and I do, that the services that the government must provide to its citizens have to be done better than they’re being done now. And neither one of us believe that the only answer to providing those better services is increasing the cost of the taxpayer. 

There are a myriad of creative ways that when people really dig down and do the hard work they can, they can determine how to do what it is that they’re doing at less, at less of a cost and at greater efficiency. And so the idea of rightsizing isn’t necessarily about eliminating things. It’s about making the things we do work better and actually doing the hard work to make them better without increasing their cost.

Bailey: You have commented on supporting coal for energy needs like data centers and artificial intelligence. Recently, Senator Shelley Moore Capito has worked on bringing one such data center to southern West Virginia. What do you see as your role in this project and in broader energy efforts? And then what about gas and renewables?

McCuskey: Yes, so the role as it pertains to bringing new data centers to West Virginia is simple. The delta between how much electricity this country produces right now and how much it’s going to consume over the next 10 years has never been greater in the history of our country. And while, you know, renewables and an all of the above approach is a great idea, we do not have the technology or the infrastructure for renewable type energy sources to produce the amount of power that this country is going to need in the time frame it’s going to need it and in a way that is economical, both for businesses and for average citizens. 

So the coal and gas is the most reliable, and when given an even playing field, without question, the most economic way of producing electricity in this country. And I believe that it is short-sighted and insane to prevent the easiest and most reliable forms of electricity from existing. All that is to say that that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be investing in and working on finding green energy solutions or sustainable energy solutions, but there, there isn’t a pathway forward if we want to be the nation’s leader in technology and data and artificial intelligence, where non-carbon-based fuels are going to be able to meet that base load.

Bailey: When you’re talking about evening the playing field, are you referring to wanting to challenge or change current EPA regulations around emissions? 

McCuskey: Yes.

Bailey: In the vein of Morrisey challenging those in the past, you do see your office, potentially, as continuing in that vein?

McCuskey: I’m super hopeful that we won’t have to. It’s looking like we’re going to have a set of significantly more rational people running both the Energy Department and the EPA. And so hopefully a lot of that change will happen in Washington, and we’re looking forward to working with anybody who is willing to allow the carbon based fuel market to thrive once again. 

And I think the important part of all of this is that we won’t, in my opinion, be able to create the kind of low cost energy that will power the revolution of what eventually will be sustainable energy without cheap electricity. And as we can see in every consumer in the state and every consumer around the country can see, our electricity bills are not getting smaller. They’re getting significantly larger, and the less expensive we can make that that expense, both for businesses and consumers, will start to drive the innovation that so many people who oppose fossil fuels are looking for. The other part of this that is really, really important to remember is that the emissions that our power plants are already under have made that sector of energy incredibly clean, and there is no non environmentally unfriendly energy source, right? 

If you’re talking about solar, you’re talking about batteries, and you’re talking about an enormous amount of economic impact. And when you’re talking about, you know, things like windmills, you have the same general issues. There is no magic bullet. We have not invented cold fusion yet, and so I think it’s important for us to use what we have at our disposal just to hopefully create another sort of economic renaissance in this country, like we saw in the industrial revolution.

Bailey In your earlier career, you worked for the American Center for Law and Justice, or the ACLJ, which is a conservative Christian organization that, in the past, has opposed same-sex marriage. Would you support any challenges to Obergefell v. Hodges in your role as West Virginia Attorney General?

McCuskey: Obergefell is good law, and it’s not going anywhere. And I think you can see from President Trump’s cabinet picks and cabinet selections that is not a priority for the federal government, nor would it be a priority in my administration.

Bailey: How do you approach defending civil rights in West Virginia more broadly? Are there any priorities as far as either trying to support certain cases or federal challenges that you see going into your administration?

McCuskey: I think one of the things that we need to work on, just in general, is, how do we ensure that the next generation of people understands what their civil rights are? How do we make sure that children understand the constitution that they live under and the ways that they can thrive in this country that, to be fair, are almost all derived by the civil rights that are guaranteed in the Constitution.

Bailey: Would that be any education initiatives from the Attorney General’s office that we could be looking out for?

McCuskey Yes, so we’re very hopeful to work with a lot of members of our law enforcement community to, number one, show that there are great pathways for really smart, really driven kids to get into law enforcement, but also some of the ways that you know, if there is somebody in law enforcement who who might have a negative interaction with somebody, what are the best ways to approach that? What are the best ways for you to protect yourself, protect your rights, and to ensure that the system, as it’s derived, is able to protect you from those kind of interactions. And I have several people on my transition team that we’ve talked to about what are the best pathways to do that. 

And I’m really excited about the opportunities to hopefully show kids why it’s a great idea to be a lawyer, why it’s a great idea to be in law enforcement, and that if you do care about civil rights, there is no better profession to get into than either one of them.

Bailey: You were a state delegate before you were the auditor. And in 2016 you joined in sponsoring a bipartisan Second Chance for Employment Act which would allow for some felony convictions to be expunged, and then a version of the bill was passed in the next year. As Attorney General now, how would you balance prosecution choices and the impact that criminal records might have after time has been served?

McCuskey: Sure, so the attorney general in West Virginia doesn’t have any prosecutorial authority. The ways in which we interact with our county prosecutors is that we help them when cases are appealed to courts higher than the circuit court. And so there is nothing specifically that my office can do in that realm, because we don’t have that power. And quite frankly, I am fine with that. 

We have a really great group of 55 county prosecutors that I’ve been very proud and happy to work with over the last eight years as auditor. I think the larger question there is we have a substance abuse problem in West Virginia that is starting to maybe take down a little bit, but we can’t close our eyes to the problem, and we can’t always, we can’t always rely on the criminal justice system as the best place for people to get help. And it is my belief that a great job and a job that makes you feel fulfilled and makes you feel like there’s a future is probably the best form of rehabilitation for anybody. 

And so everything we can be doing to help people who truly want to be helped, and are doing everything they need to be doing to turn their life around, to ensure we’re doing everything on the other end to give them that opportunity.

Bailey: Current Attorney General Morrisey went from Attorney General to Governor. Would you be seeking higher office in the future? What are your goals looking ahead?

McCuskey: My current goals are to build an Attorney General’s office that has the same level of talent and success that Morrissey has had, ensuring that this office does everything it needs to do to support his efforts in the governor’s office, as well as to protect the citizens of West Virginia, not only from federal overreach, but from all of those who wish for for our success to be thwarted. And you know, the cards will play out where they will. My life is in service, and my parents told me a long time ago that, you know, there is no better way to spend your time than trying to make people’s lives around you better. It’s why I got into this job in the first place, and I will continue to serve in whichever ways the people of West Virginia let me do.

WVSU Lawsuit Against Union Carbide A Mistrial

A mistrial was declared Monday in a lawsuit filed by West Virginia State University (WVSU) against Dow Chemical after a hung jury.  

WVSU filed the suit in 2017, alleging that Union Carbide, a subsidiary of Dow Chemical, polluted groundwater in and around the campus. The trial had closing arguments on Friday, but by Monday the jury was already at an impasse.

In notes provided to the judge by jurors, one of the jurors became hostile, causing a breakdown in the jury’s ability to come to a consensus. According to the notes the juror was being “confrontational” and “offensive” to some of the other jurors.

The Location

Institute is an unincorporated area that lies between the city of Dunbar, home to WVSU and the Union Carbide Chemical Plant. 

A map provided by a independent contractor to the EPA on ground water contamination by Union Carbide.
CH2M Hill East Property Boundary Investigation page 2.

This unincorporated area is home to a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act cleanup site, overseen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA is a 1976 law that requires the cleanup of hazardous materials.

A timeline of events.
Briana Heaney/West Virginia Public Broadcasting

The Argument

WVSU says that toxic pollution created by Dow Chemical subsidiary, Union Carbide, is polluting properties owned by WVSU. WVSU claims this pollution makes it more costly for the university to expand because it will have to spend millions to make areas affected by pollutants safe for residential and nonresidential use. 

Dow says the company is not responsible, and the Institute Plant site poses no health risks to the community, including its neighbor WVSU. 

“Dow Chemical’s Institute Plant has contaminated the groundwater under West Virginia State University with three likely carcinogens, yet Dow refuses to clean up the pollution and pay for the harm,” the plaintiff, WVSU’s Board of Governors, said in the lawsuit. 

The EPA found benzene, chlorobenzene, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, and tetrachloroethene in the ground water at the site. EPA’s remedy requires land and groundwater use restrictions for activities that may result in exposure to those contaminants. Ground water systems are interconnected and do not stop at property boundary lines. 

In the court filing, WVSU said Dow is aware of the damage its subsidiary, Union Carbide, has done to the air and ground water. 

“Dow admits that the pollution under the university’s property is so serious that no one can live in the polluted area, or even work or study there without special protective measures,” WVSU said in a response to Dow’s motion to dismiss. 

The filing states that Dow — not the university — says the WVSU’s property has been so severely damaged that no one can live where the contamination has spread to, and any building on the property requires barriers to block toxic fumes. 

Dow refutes this. 

“The Institute site poses no health risk to the community, including WVSU, and the data supports this conclusion,” Union Carbide Media Relations said in an emailed statement. “WVSU has repeatedly made the same assertion. UCC (Union Carbide Corporation) has met, and will continue to meet and exceed, all of its remediation commitments with oversight from the U.S. EPA and the WVDEP.”

Dow has been Union Carbide’s parent company since 2001. Dow says it is not responsible for Union Carbide’s every liability. In particular, it’s not necessarily responsible for these instances of Union Carbide’s alleged pollution at the company’s Institute Plant. 

“Dow never owned or operated the Institute Plant, foreclosing any argument that Dow may be held directly liable,” Dow said in a court filing. 

West Virginia State University can move forward with the litigation by going back to square one, starting a new trial with new jurors in Kanawha Circuit Court. A new date will be established by the circuit court. 

Dow Chemical declined an interview request. However, it said in an emailed statement that there are no health risks to the community, including West Virginia State University. 

The university and its law firm, Bailey and Glasser, declined to comment on the ongoing litigation.

Mon Power’s Harrison Plant Tops EPA’s Toxic Release List Statewide

Out of 177 facilities statewide, the Mon Power Harrison Power Station ranks first on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxic Release Inventory.

A power plant in Harrison County releases more toxic material into the air than any other facility in the state, according to federal data.

Out of 177 facilities statewide, the Mon Power Harrison Power Station ranks first on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Toxic Release Inventory.

The plant is responsible for 7.4 million pounds of toxic releases into the air and water every year.

Sulfuric acid accounts for most of what the plant releases into the air, and ammonia into the water.

Hannah Catlett, a spokeswoman for Mon Power parent FirstEnergy, said the company complies with all environmental regulations. 

The next four facilities on the Toxic Release Inventory are also coal-burning power plants, but all four release fewer than 3 million pounds annually.

The four are the Pleasants Power Station, now operated by Omnis Technologies; Appalachian Power’s John Amos plant; Mon Power’s Fort Martin Power Station and Dominion Power’s Mount Storm Power Station.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), sulfuric acid forms when sulfur dioxide from burning coal, oil and gas reacts with water in the air.

According to a Mon Power fact sheet, the Harrison Power Station is equipped with pollution controls that remove 98 percent of sulfur dioxide from the plant’s emissions.

Us & Them Encore: Dicamba Woes

In February, a federal judge in Arizona halted the spraying of the herbicide dicamba, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says farmers are allowed to use it for this coming growing season. In this installment of Us & Them, we listen back to a story from our archives, exploring the heated conflict unraveling in agricultural communities.

There’s a nationwide rift among farmers over the use of dicamba, a popular herbicide. A 2024 federal court ruling has halted dicamba’s use, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has given the green light for farmers to use existing supplies this year.

In this episode of Us & Them, we revisit a story from our archives that delves into the intense battle unfolding in farm country. Originally designed to help soybean farmers combat ‘pigweed,’ dicamba has proven controversial because it drifts from where it’s sprayed, causing harm to desirable plants. The legal fallout has reached a point where farmers and gardeners hesitate to speak out about crop or plant damage due to fear.

On the flip side, those advocating for dicamba have taken the matter to court, challenging the authority over pesticide use rules in some states. In a departure from the typical tight-knit atmosphere of rural farm communities, where issues are often resolved locally, Arkansas is experiencing an un-neighborly atmosphere, with tensions escalating.

This episode of Us & Them is presented with support from the Fund for Investigative Journalism, the West Virginia Humanities Council and the CRC Foundation.

Subscribe to Us & Them on Apple Podcasts, NPR One, RadioPublic, Spotify, Stitcher and beyond.


Terry Fuller, former member of the Arkansas Plant Board, shows Us & Them host Trey Kay the place where several of his hay bales were set ablaze not long after he made public statements calling for limitation on the use of a special formulation of dicamba during the growing season. Fuller also says that two of his tractors were vandalized which caused more than $60,000 worth of damage.

Photo Credit: Loretta Williams
Terry Fuller, former member of the Arkansas Plant Board, displays a couple of signs that have repeatedly been posted alongside the roads near his house. One sign could be seen from his daughter’s bedroom window on Christmas Day.

Photo Credit: Loretta Williams
Richard Coy’s family has been in the honey producing business since the 1960s. Over the years, Coy’s Honey Farm became the largest commercial bee business in Arkansas. Coy claims dicamba has had an adverse effect on the plant life necessary for honey bees to thrive and produce honey. He says the conditions got so bad that he and his family had to move their business from Arkansas to Mississippi.

Photo Credit: Loretta Williams
Franklin Fogelman, a soybean farmer in Arkansas, speaking at a special session of the Arkansas Plant Board in 2019. He believes farmers like him need to be able to use dicamba during the growing season to control weeds in their fields.

Photo Credit: Loretta Williams
Reed Storey, a soybean and cotton farmer, opposes the use of the newer formulations of dicamba during the growing season because he believes the herbicide can harm the crops of neighboring farmers. He sees this as “big agriculture against smaller growers.”

Photo Credit: Loretta Williams
Charles “Bo” Sloan is the manager of the Dale Bumpers White River Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas. He says dicamba has a tendency to volatilize when the weather gets above 85 degrees. When the chemical transforms into a gas, it can drift away from its intended targets. Sloan has heard the complaints that dicamba might adversely impact agriculture, and is also worried that it might be harming the environment in some of the nation’s protected lands.

Photo Credit: Trey Kay/West Virginia Public Broadcasting

Check out the original Farm Wars episode the Us & Them team produced for Reveal in 2019.

Legislature Paves Way For New Green Technology

The process of taking carbon out of the air and storing it is called carbon sequestration. Trees naturally sequester carbon by absorbing it out of the air, using it for energy, and storing some of that energy in their roots. 

New green technology called carbon capture can take CO2 released during the burning of greenhouse gasses out of the air. Air is filtered through a fan that uses technology to remove the CO2, turn that CO2 into a liquid, and then pump it into the ground.

The process of taking carbon out of the air and storing it is called carbon sequestration. Trees naturally sequester carbon by absorbing it out of the air, using it for energy, and storing some of that energy in their roots. 

New green technology called carbon capture can take CO2 released during the burning of greenhouse gasses out of the air. Air is filtered through a fan that uses technology to remove the CO2, turn that CO2 into a liquid, and then pump it into the ground.

This is a possible answer to the excess CO2 in the atmosphere that is causing the climate crisis. 

The Senate passed House Bill 5045 Friday. The bill gives the state the authority to enforce Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), rules so the state can regulate carbon sequestration. This is part of a bid for the EPA to grant the state the ability to regulate the new technology. It requires that the states abide by or exceed carbon sequestration regulations put forth by the EPA. 

Randy Smith, R-Tucker, the lead sponsor of the bill, said this will help the state get the new technology up and running quickly by bypassing long permit wait times typical with the EPA. 

“So EPA is going to put the rules out there,” Smith said. “And normally they enforce these rules. So basically, it just gives the state of West Virginia the authority to enforce the EPA rules, you know, because we can’t supersede the federal (law).”

Smith said he wants West Virginia to be on the forefront of this technology.

“West Virginia is sort of one of the leaders of trying to get the rules and regulations in place, when the technology gets there,” Smith said, “Then we’re ahead of the game.”

Others worry about the risks of a leak in the underground carbon storage that could taint drinkable groundwater supplies. 

Around the state some have concerns with West Virginia’s bid to manage the new technology following countless disasters related to the mismanagement of industry in the state.

Smith said this bill is a proactive measure to get rules and regulations into place so those disasters don’t happen. 

“The first step is to make sure that when this does happen, that we’ll be able to manage it,” he said. “You know, there’s a lot of geological information that has to go (into it), they’re not gonna be able to just put it in an abandoned gas well or anything like that. These will be specialty wells, where they can’t leak to make sure stuff like that doesn’t happen if this technology does take off.” 

Others opposed to the new technology say it perpetuates the use of fossil fuels. 

The bill has passed both chambers, but it goes back to the House next to see if changes made in the Senate are agreeable to the delegates. 

Another notable bill passed today would make it illegal for drivers to cruise in the left lane if they are not passing, or under other specific situations like avoiding a stationary emergency vehicle or avoiding construction. 

Exit mobile version