Appalachian Journalists Tackle Stereotypes And Economy With New Outlets

It wasn’t too long ago that Michael Farmer, a pastor in Charleston, West Virginia, received an email asking him a question that was already on his mind: “As a Black Southern Baptist pastor in West Virginia, what is my role in telling our stories?”

The email was from Ashton Marra, the managing digital editor of a news organization called 100 Days in Appalachia. Marra was inviting Farmer to be a part of a new project, the Appalachian Advisors Network.

“The Advisors Network is really three parts,” Marra said, “And the first part is a database of creators.” This way, Marra said, rather than national or international news outlets sending a journalist from New York City or Los Angeles to cover rural Appalachia, those same outlets could hire a freelance journalist rooted in those same communities, who could tell a more nuanced story.

“The second part is a resource guide,” Marra continued. That way, if those outlets insist on sending an outsider to write about Appalachia, at least that journalist can read a pamphlet or listen to a podcast on their flight in.

The third part, the one for which Marra was reaching out to Farmer, is meant to address a problem journalism industry insiders call “parachute journalism.”

“National media parachute into our region, tell stories about Appalachians that were predetermined. ‘I’m going to go into Appalachia and tell a story about a laid off coal miner who’s gonna vote for Trump.’ And nobody else’s stories [get] told,” Marra said.

To counter that, Marra and her colleagues assembled the Appalachian Advisors Network: a group of 14 Appalachian community leaders from Pennsylvania to Alabama who have agreed to help journalists gain more perspectives on the full diversity of the region.

The project launched in early September, 60 days before the presidential election, and has already fielded inquiries from outlets including People Magazine. (Disclosure note: 100 Days in Appalachia is an occasional collaborator with the Ohio Valley ReSource, and distributes ReSource content.)

The Advisors Network is not the only new venture in Appalachian journalism making waves this election season. Investigative journalism outlet Mountain State Spotlight launched September with bombshell reporting on the coal empire of West Virginia’s billionaire Governor Jim Justice. In Pennsylvania, two college students are launching a student-run journal of Appalachian stories. And in Kentucky, an oral historian released a podcast documenting the lives of rural LGBTQ people across the country.

F. Brian Ferguson
/
Mountain State Spotlight was founded to produce investigative journalism for West Virginians

Capital Concerns

It’s no coincidence we’re seeing a flurry of new journalism emerging out of Appalachia right now, said Penny Muse Abernathy, Knight Chair in Journalism and Digital Media Economics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

“I think what we’re seeing is the collapse of the for-profit model that sustained most local newspapers for 200 years,” she said.

Abernathy is the author of a new report laying bare the threats facing news outlets. Between 2004 and 2020, the report found, one in four newspapers closed or merged with another paper. Still more reduced their reporting staff, leaving what Muse-Abernathy called “ghost papers,” outlets that were still printing news, but lacked the staff or the resources to thoroughly report on the community.

Most of those papers were in communities that were in deep economic distress.

Newspapers die for a number of reasons, but the extinction event of the modern age is largely attributable to the decline of the ad-based for-profit model. For 200 years, Abernathy said, most newspapers relied on subscriptions from community members and on advertising from local businesses. Both those revenue streams have slowed to a trickle: According to the Pew Research Center, the number of people subscribed to a print or digital news outlet is at its lowest since 1940, the first year for which data is available, and ad revenue fell by 62 percent between 2008 and 2018. Of the $71 million spent on digital ad revenue (on all websites, not just news sites) in 2019, more than half went to just two companies: Google and Facebook.

Today, one out of every five journalists lives in New York, Los Angeles, or Washington, D.C., leaving many rural people in “news deserts,” communities where no journalists have their eye on the county executives or members of the local development board.

“When you lose a local newspaper, you lose a reporter who’s going to cover a local board of education meeting. The county commission meeting,” Abernathy said. “When you lose a regional newspaper, you lose reporters on those bigger beats like education and the environment, which impact thousands of people across a whole region.”

Abernathy believes the future of media lies in nonprofit journalism, outlets like nonprofit investigative newsroom ProPublica and networks like National Public Radio that get their funding from grants and individual donations.

Ken Ward Jr., a reporter at ProPublica and co-founder of Mountain State Spotlight, prefers to call it civic journalism.

“It harkens into all the other civic institutions we think of in our community, whether it’s a public library or a public school. An important part of civic life is news, is information about the issues that you and your neighbors are facing.”

With a staff of less than a dozen, Mountain State Spotlight is financed by individual donations, by foundations, and by ProPublica, which pays Ward’s salary.

Not a Monolith

The flurry of new nonprofit Appalachian journalism is not only motivated by pursuing new funding models, but by elevating the voices and perspectives of those who have not traditionally been represented in mainstream media.

“Country Queers is an ongoing multimedia oral history project that I founded in 2013,” said project founder Rae Garringer, who uses gender-neutral they/them pronouns, “Out of a pretty intense personal need to find and connect with other rural queer people.”

The Country Queers podcast, which is supported by crowdfunding, premiered this spring with an eight-episode season.

(Disclosure: Garringer is a former staff member at WMMT, a radio station that is a member of the Ohio Valley ReSource collaborative.)

Garringer isn’t sure they would consider Country Queers journalism, though the boundary of what does and doesn’t count as such can be imprecise. Rather, Garringer said Country Queers is “In the vein of cultural organizing around narrative shift, a cultural shift. To reclaim our history and our elders in these spaces, because of the way that systems have kept us from each other. The way that homophobia has kept us from each other.”

 

Another publication, the student-run Review of Appalachia, also aims to diversify whose voices get heard.

Friends and co-founders James Henderson and Jack Alex White are sophomores at the University of Virginia and Harvard University respectively. “Once you go to a college that’s a little further away or in an urban atmosphere, you get a little introspective about where you’re from,” said White, a first-generation college student from a coal-mining family.

“I have people in my family line who were illiterate, who couldn’t read,” White continued. “They clocked out at maybe a fourth, fifth-grade education. Brilliant people if you talked to them. People that contemplated the world, that had personal philosophies, that enjoyed consuming art, that were creative. And the rest of the world totally misses that, and opens and shuts the book at poverty, mostly white people, uneducated.”

Though the Review of Appalachia is new and has not yet published any work, Henderson and White hope the publication can be a journalistic or literary home for Appalachian young people who don’t want to have to leave their hometowns to express their intellect.

A similar interest motivates Michael Farmer, the Southern Baptist preacher who is a member of the Appalachian Advisors Network. “Many times, as an African American male in West Virginia, I’m considered to be the monolith for everybody in my community. And I have to pull back and say, I’m not that person. I just have one perspective. But I can give you that perspective, and there’s value in that perspective.”

BBC Story on Roadkill Cookoff is Lazy, Classist Clickbait

On October 3rd, BBC News published an article with this headline: “Among the forested hills of West Virginia, residents of a small town have taken to cooking roadkill to revive their flagging economy.”

The lead photograph was of an older gentleman missing several teeth.

The article was meant to document the RoadkillCookoff, an annual festival held in Marlinton, the county seat of Pocahontas, where chefs both local and not compete for a culinary crown while county residents and tourists alike converge for the day. The Cookoff is a play on outsider stereotypes of West Virginia and is undertaken with full awareness of this, but the BBC missed the irony.

Credit BBC
/
This unidentified man was part of the original BBC story on the Cookoff. The photo appears to have been removed from the story.

When I wrote to the photographer Charlie Northcott and directly to the BBC editorial staff to complain about these misrepresentations, they responded with justifications: “I hope the exposure will help…more eyes should translate to more visitors” and quibbles: “Overall we do not believe the report paints an inaccurate picture.”

Dear BBC: I disagree.

This article was indeed a rare opportunity for West Virginia culture to be featured in an international publication, but it was a wasted one. This is the bind West Virginians often find themselves in as the subjects of journalism written by outsiders, “parachuting” in for a day and then rolling out – forced to choose between existing at all and existing truthfully.

It may be that this article and its photographs are not technically factually false, but the picture painted here sure as hell isn’t true.

Credit Charlie Northcott / BBC
/
BBC
Square dance in Marlinton included in the BBC photo essay

At this year’s Cookoff, when the sun went down, there was a square dance in the Opera House, a historic light-filled concert venue that hosts both Jim James of My Morning Jacket and the Pocahontas County High School Prom. A photo of this square dance taken by the DC-based Northcott was included in the BBC piece.

But next to this lovely photograph, the editors chose to place a statistic about West Virginia’s unemployment rate.

Another Northcott photo shows a run-down white clapboard house covered in ivy, with statements about the poverty rate in West Virginia and I can’t help but wonder how long Northcott had to circle around town before he settled upon a house that looked suitably poor, for the norm on the gridded and numbered avenues of Marlinton that immediately surround the festival is well-kept two story colonials painted pastel blue and yellow.

Credit Charlie Northcott / BBC
/
BBC
In the BBC story, Curt Kershner of the West Virginia Citizens Defense League says, “CNN is known as the Communist News Network in these parts.”

Yet another photograph shows a member of the Citizen’s Defense League holding a machine gun along with a quote from the fellow saying “CNN is known as the Communist News Network in these parts.” With a quick Facebook post, I learned that the man is not even from Pocahontas County. (“Not being local does not preclude the CDL member from having knowledge about the area,” argued the BBC staff.)

“I was just baffled,” commented my friend, local Pam Pritt, the longtime editor of weekly The Pocahontas Times. “I wondered if the reporter was at the same festival I attended.”

Pocahontas County is the birthplace of literature Nobel Prize winner Pearl S. Buck, and hosts Allegheny Echoes, a local annual Bluegrass and Old-Time music institute to which people from all over the world travel to study under local teachers, one of whom now performs with Old Crow Medicine Show.

This is exactly the kind of classist, lazy journalism that plagues national and international coverage about West Virginia…

In the mid 1970s, it was home to more than 200 Back to the Landers, and it was twice the host of the annual gathering of the Rainbow Family of Living Light. The county holds within its borders the Gesundheit! Institute, a hospital combining traditional and alternative medicines founded by Patch Adams, and the artist colony Zendik Farm.

The county also has a thriving farmer’s market, where people can purchase fresh vegetables with food stamps. In the 1980s and 1990s it was also the headquarters of the National Alliance, the white supremacist group headed by William Pierce.

Pocahontas County is spectacular. Pocahontas County is isolated. Pocahontas County is conservative. Pocahontas County is radical. Pocahontas County is historically democratic, and a politically mixed place. West Virginia went Democratic in every presidential election from 1932-1996 except three and is also home to many anti-racist folks that support choice.

But none of that context is included in this BBC article. This writer chooses to highlight the county’s poverty rate and present it as a Trump-loving monolith.

“I had the same reaction,” wrote my friend Andrea Larason, who grew up in the county. “I just kept thinking they were making so many assumptions.”

“Thank you,” wrote Amanda Unroe, who also grew up there. “My excitement for the coverage quickly turned to anger.”

I lived in Pocahontas County about two years, first serving as an AmeriCorps VISTA and then simply as a transplant, though I still go back about a month out of every year. As a former resident of Pocahontas County and as a journalist, this article disgusts and offends me. As an outsider journalist working on a book about Pocahontas County, I am constantly checking myself, asking myself: is this true? How do I know? I will fail, I will make mistakes.

Representation is fraught. But throwing up one’s hands, using images and stereotypes as clickbait and quibbling about the facts is a cop-out. This is exactly the kind of classist, lazy journalism that plagues national and international coverage about West Virginia.

I’m tired of it. It is simply not good enough.

Rising Above Appalachian Stereotypes for a Higher Education

While it’s no longer politically correct to use racist, or gender-related remarks that stereotype groups of people, what about negative West Virginian or Appalachian stereotypes?

Appalachians are commonly stereotyped as white, lazy, tobacco smoking, overall-wearing, poor farmers with poor dental hygiene, no indoor plumbing, and no shoes.

So how does that influence the pursuit of an education? Well it depends on the individual Appalachian mindset. The conversation about the connection and possible impact continues with this second report.

Appalachian Stereotypes and the Impact on Student Success

Director of Retention at Concord University is Sarah Beasley. It’s her job to basically keep students enrolled and graduated at the university.

Beasley recently hosted a forum called, Appalachian Stereotypes and the Impact on Student Success. 

Beasley’s interest grew out her dissertation research in Mingo County. She looked at college access and the success of rural first generation students.  Beasley asked college bound or current college students to share any positive or negative stereotypes they know, about West Virginia or Appalachia.

PART TWO:

Meet two West Virginians that were treated ‘different’ while in college. Find out how they reacted.

PART ONE:

0924Stereotypes1WEB.mp3
Listen to hear two West Virginians describe how they were spoken to because of their Appalachian background.
Credit King Features / http://seriewikin.serieframjandet.se/index.php/Bild:Barney_Google.JPG. Licensed under Fair use of copyrighted material in the context of Barney Google via Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bgoogle.jpg#mediaviewer/Fi
/
http://seriewikin.serieframjandet.se/index.php/Bild:Barney_Google.JPG. Licensed under Fair use of copyrighted material in the context of Barney Google via Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bgoogle.jpg#mediaviewer/Fi

Young West Virginians Say There's a Negative Perception of Those Who Stay In the State

Editor’s Note: Today we continue our series on how to keep young people in West Virginia. Yesterday, we looked at the struggle many people go through to find work in the state in their chosen fields. Today we examine the stereotypes young West Virginians who choose to stay in the state face from those on the outside.

With the state expected to lose nearly 20 thousand people over the next 15 years, many are trying to figure out how to entice young people to stay in West Virginia in the hopes of reversing that trend. Some young people want to stay; others don’t for many reasons, like finding work. But many young people agree there’s a perception amongst young West Virginians that people have to leave, not just to find work, but to simply succeed.

Logan Spears, a 25 years old bartender, works at the Dancing Fig on High Street, in Morgantown.

Spears says in his group of friends, there’s a bias against those that stay in West Virginia, primarily because of compensation.

Most of the people that stay in the state are looked down upon by the others. ‘Oh, I guess he didn’t as good a job as I did’,” Spears said.

“I think one of the big things is the pay that you get from it, it kind of goes on the price of living.”

But it’s not just about money; it’s also about attitude.

Jocelyn and Matt Crawford live in Charleston, and have been married since 2012.

“It seems to be that people who were born and raised in West Virginia, if you choose to stick around, the people who have left to go to other places, they have sort of made it and you have not, even if you’ve been doing great things with your life,” said Jocelyn Crawford.

It seems like a lot of the people that we know who have gone to school in West Virginia are looking to leave, or feel like they are stuck in a rut, even if they have a good job or are successful in other ways,” Matt Crawford said.

The Crawfords, believe national media coverage of West Virginia, which they say tends to be negative, plays a role.

Whenever there’s a study out and it has West Virginia at the bottom of something good or the top of something bad, people talk about it a lot. It seems like it’s almost been ingrained in people our age, that we’re the fattest state. Or the dumbest state, and you can’t succeed if you’re here,” said Matt Crawford.

Not Buying It

The Crawfords aren’t buying that assessment. And they’re not alone.

Mike Jones was raised on a tobacco farm in Virginia. He moved to West Virginia for college, met the woman who would become his wife, and decided to stay. He now lives in Charleston and works at a small business in Montgomery.

He says anyone can find something fun to do in West Virginia. And he says it’s the true mountainous beauty of the state that keeps people here.

I had never been rock climbing before until I went to New River Gorge. Just several experiences that I wouldn’t have had in other parts of the country,” Jones said.

“If people look up from their screens they will realize there’s plenty going on around them and not everything is going on away from them. I’ve experienced several people that will not be in the moment. They would rather be somewhere else. If that attitude doesn’t change, then they are not going to experience happiness.”

Exit mobile version