W.Va. Will Distribute $40 Million In Grants To Rural Hospitals

$40 million appropriated by the legislature during the most recent special session is now available as grant funding for rural hospitals.

Gov. Jim Justice’s office announced the launch of the Rural Hospitals Grant Program in a press release Thursday, with a link to the application.

“Our rural hospitals are cornerstones of our communities in West Virginia,” Justice said in the release. “They support our families and neighbors in their toughest moments. Every West Virginian deserves access to quality healthcare, no matter where they live. This funding will help us make that a reality for everyone.”

The grant program has $40 million of appropriated funds to disburse. During the most recent special session of the legislature, lawmakers passed Senate Bill 2010, appropriating the surplus balance to the Governor’s Civil Contingent Fund to support rural hospitals.

Neither the application form, nor the press release make clear what constitutes a rural hospital, but the policies and procedures document for the grant program reads, “All rural hospitals in this state are eligible to apply.”

According to the application, grants must be used for capital improvement projects expected to be completed within 18 months of the date of the award.

Applications are due by November 15 and the governor’s office will disburse funds upon verification of eligibility.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting with support from Marshall Health.

WVSOM Recognized By CDC For Pandemic Solutions

The West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine was recognized in a CDC report that examines how state and county-level agencies used COVID-19 grants.

The West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine (WVSOM) was recognized in a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) report that examines how state and county-level agencies used the center’s 2021 COVID-19 health disparities grants.

Out of 108 grant awards, totaling $2.25 billion, Greenbrier County’s development of mobile testing units and no-cost medical transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic was one of three programs in the U.S. highlighted in the CDC’s report on rural health access provided by 2021 grants.

Greenbrier County is the second largest county in the state with a population of about 32,400 spread across 1,019 square miles of rural land.

The county also saw one of the state’s highest COVID-19 infection rates with hospitals reaching capacity and health department resources stretched thin.

“A grant like this allows you to bring people in right when COVID-19 is at its worst, and you can’t get out to see folks, but they can now get in to see you and get treatment,” said Don Smith, WVSOM’s communications director. “That made all the difference.”

The CDC’s health disparities grants were designed to be flexible, allowing local health departments to address pandemic-related challenges by building systems that continue to address ongoing health disparities.

“We don’t take solutions to the communities,” Smith said. “We go to the communities and find the problems, and then this grant allowed the flexibility. It didn’t say, ‘You have to do this.’ It said, ‘What are the problems in your community, and how can you fix them?’”

WVSOM and its partners used the grant to develop a solution to the county’s transportation barriers to care.

WVSOM partnered with the Mountain Transit Authority (MTA), Greenbrier County Health Department and Greenbrier County Homeland Security to ease access to reliable transportation and community-located testing services.

“By providing this grant and the flexibility and allowing healthcare professionals in the communities to recognize the problem and then address the problem with a creative solution works,” Smith said. “I think that’s really the success story here, and that everyone in the community, our partners willing to collaborate, work together on a solution, and everyone coming to the table for the greater good.”

The medical transportation program in Greenbrier County is no longer operational.

“The grant did expire, but I think that’s one of the reasons for this report,” Smith said. “They wanted to gather the data, look at it, and see what worked. I think that’s one of the reasons why our program was selected as one of three in the country because they said, ‘This is something that can address problems in the future.’”

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting with support from Marshall Health.

Mingo County’s Only Hospital Reopens

In 1918, Williamson Memorial Hospital opened in Williamson, West Virginia to provide health care services to the residents of rural Mingo County.

After its closure in 2020, Williamson Memorial, the only hospital in Mingo County, was purchased by a local community-based healthcare facility, Williamson Health and Wellness Center, for $3.68 million.

Since then, millions of dollars have been invested in renovating the facility. The building has now been fully renovated, from its electrical system to its sanitation lines — with state-of-the-art equipment and an air-quality system that meets the latest regulatory standards.

In a Sept. 12 press release, the hospital announced that the West Virginia Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) recently surveyed and licensed the facility to operate a 76-bed general hospital.

“This is a victory for our entire community,” said Williamson Health and Wellness Center CEO Dr. C. Donovan “Dino” Beckett. “The new Williamson Memorial is part of the fabric of the Tug Valley and all those who live and work here. It is critical to our integrated care system and our goal of health for everyone.”

According to a report from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, almost 200 rural hospitals have closed since 2005. 

Beckett said the new Williamson Memorial will rely on integration with Williamson Health and Wellness Center, a federally qualified health center, to bolster its long-term viability.

“Our integrated care model will help us ensure the new Williamson Memorial is not only back but is here to stay for generations to come,” Beckett said.

Tim Hatfield, CEO of the new Williamson Memorial, said the facility’s reopening is especially important for the community in the post-pandemic healthcare landscape.

“I’ve talked to the National Rural Healthcare Association in [Washington] D.C., and they told me in the past that our hospital was the first hospital to close because of the pandemic and COVID,” Hatfield said. “There’s been 30 hospitals to close after we closed related to COVID, but we are the first hospital that has ever reopened.”

Hatfield said the reopening of the hospital is a vital component of Williamson Health and Wellness’ goal to provide a continuum of care.

“It’s pretty special in 2024 to see any hospital in America that’s opening up,” Hatfield said. “The way we envision this with the FQHC (Federally Qualified Health Center), the clinics, we’ve got behavioral health, we’ve got family medicine, podiatry, occupational health, we got the Post 49 Farmers Market, dentistry, optometry, and now with the onboarding of the hospital, we provide a lot of comprehensive care to meet the community’s needs.”

While expanding access to care takes precedence for the Williamson Memorial team, the hospital’s reopening also creates employment opportunities with benefits in Mingo County. Hatfield says 65 percent of the hospital’s employees who worked at the hospital before it closed have returned to take care of their neighbors.

“About 65 percent of our employees that were here in 2020, left to go someplace else to work, but couldn’t wait to come back to work in our hospital, just because of the small town community feel hospital of taking care of your neighbors and friends,” Hatfield said. “That’s pretty neat.”

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting with support from Marshall Health.

WVU Professor Discusses Mental Health Resources For Rural Communities

Youth in rural communities are just as likely to exhibit risky behaviors as their urban and suburban peers, but may have less access to help. 

Youth in rural communities are just as likely to exhibit risky behaviors as their urban and suburban peers but may have less access to help. 

Kristine Ramsay-Seaner, West Virginia University assistant professor of counseling, spoke with reporter Chris Schulz about a coalition developing resources to change that nationwide.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Schulz: What constitutes risky behavior?

Ramsay-Seaner: Risky behavior can be such a broad term. When we typically think of risky behaviors, I do think our minds go to substance use. But what we are talking about, we’re trying to expand risky behaviors to behaviors that really do just put youth at risk. Whether that’s using pornography at a really early age or engaging in what’s known in the counseling field as non-suicidal self-injury, but we often refer to as self-harm. We even plan to talk about mental health. Mental health, in and of itself, is not a risky behavior. But there are risky behaviors that can go along with mental health, you know, whether that’s, again, the self-harm you may see going along with something like anxiety and depression, or even self-medicating.

Schulz: Can you tell me about the particular or unique need for addressing this issue in rural communities? 

Ramsay-Seaner: Rural communities often struggle with being underserved. In a rural community, they may be sharing their 4-H agent with another county. They might even be sharing their school counselor with another school. And what that means is youth development professionals who work in rural communities, they see a lot, and they’re often asked to respond to a lot, but often due to the rurality, they may not be able to go to the same conferences, the same workshops. They may not be getting the same level of support, they may not even have the same amount of peers to consult with. So when we see these risky behaviors happening in rural communities, they often can just carry higher risk, in the sense of maybe this individual does need to be hospitalized, or needs to at least be evaluated for hospitalization, but the closest hospital could be a significant distance away. And I’m a youth development professional who wasn’t even trained in identifying suicidal behavior, or while I was trained to identify it, it’s very different to be trained and now to practice it. 

So when we think about youth living in rural communities, they’re going to spend often, potentially more time online, because right, that’s where we can connect with people, that’s where we can reach out with people. But we may also just feel more isolated in our problems, because we may not feel like we have the same outlets to go to, that our urban peers have. And just for reference, nationally, we have just a significant mental health shortage. But in particular, we have a youth mental health provider shortage. All over the country, youth are existing on these wait lists just trying to get providers to see them. And there’s that’s no more relevant than in rural communities.

Schulz: Can you tell me a little bit about the collaboration between WVU and I believe it was Georgia and the Dakotas?

Ramsay-Seaner: Transparently, I moved to West Virginia University from South Dakota State University about a year ago. In terms of the University of Georgia, my colleague down there, whose name is Dr. Amanda Giordano, she’s also a counselor educator. And Dr. Giordano has done, actually, a lot of work in what we call process addictions or behavioral addictions. As opposed to substances, these are behaviors, think about like gambling. Dr. Giordano and I will bring the more mental health provider knowledge as two people who have been trained to be clinicians. And then in terms of South Dakota State University and North Dakota State University, they’re really bringing that adolescent piece, that extension piece, and that youth development professional piece. We’re putting together this knowledge of, I know what it means to train counselors, and you know what it means to either be a youth development professional or train a youth development professional. How can we all work together to make sure that this training meets the needs of a wide variety of providers who exist in these rural communities?

Schulz: Why is it so important to focus these resources on younger people? 

Ramsay-Seaner: I think about what research shows is that early intervention prevention is really beneficial to long term prognosis. The earlier we can respond, the earlier we can provide services. Again, maybe we can even prevent some of these behaviors, or we can prevent them before they maybe increase in severity and concern. So if I can step in and sort of help you at 16, maybe I’m providing you with some of the skills and knowledge and some of the foundational pieces to help you so that when you’re 18 and you go away to college, maybe you are just more aware of binge drinking. Again. It’s not to say that an individual is not going to binge drink, but maybe now they understand even safer ways, if you are going to engage in some of these behaviors, how can I engage in them as safely as possible? That’s why we call it safety first, we really think about safety skills.

Schulz: What kind of resources are you developing? I know that you’ve discussed training, but what exactly are the resources that you’re developing?

Ramsay-Seaner: One of the things that we’re developing is a podcast, and Dr. Amanda Giordano is actually going to take the lead on that. The podcasts are going to be about 30-minute episodes, and they will focus on how to respond to some of these behaviors, with expert feedback included. So Dr. Giordano plans to interview a wide variety of individuals related to some of the things that we’re going to talk about in our training. One of the places she’s identified is she really hopes to talk to someone from the FBI related to sextortion. 

And then the training that we will actually develop will involve sort of a foundational overview of everything. It’s two hours. Maybe it’s the only one that you get to go to, but it provides you maybe just a wide variety of foundational information. And then we’ll have a training that’s focused specifically more on what we’re calling health risks, and then one that we are focused more on digital risks. And then the final piece that we’re really excited about is developing a training that provides just more skills. So like, yes, now you’ve learned about this. How do you actually respond to this? What’s the right way to ask some of these questions? What are things that we want to avoid? How do we get more comfortable as the individuals who often are being asked to respond to things that we maybe even weren’t trained in? 

Think about the responsibilities placed on youth development professionals are just increasing as society changes, right? I’m of the “Truth” generation. I really remember those anti-smoking campaigns. But we were talking about vaping, and now we’re talking about Zyns (nicotine pouches). So these things are changing so rapidly. How do we prepare you to respond to some of these things that you’ve maybe even never thought of before?

Schulz: If there’s anything that I haven’t given you a chance to discuss with me, or something that we have discussed that you’d like to highlight, please do so now.

Ramsay-Seaner: I think that it’s really important to provide more universal based trainings. And what I mean by that is a training that doesn’t target just a certain population. So we’re not just thinking about the kids who are already doing in-school suspension, or we’re not just thinking about the kids who maybe are involved in a juvenile drug court. We really want to think about all kids, and that’s why we really want to train a wide variety of youth development professionals and even potentially caregivers, because risky behaviors are not unique to one group. 

If you use the internet, the reality is risky behaviors then exist, whether it’s even the fact that youth are often targeted for scams And I think you made this point of, so much of what we’re talking about is not just behaviors that youth could fall into, or youth could be at risk for. But the reality is, we as adults, I think, are sometimes prepared differently than we prepare youth, because we’re often caught off guard that youth are even experiencing some of these things. So we’re really excited to hopefully help professionals just feel like I feel a little bit more confident in doing this job. I feel a little bit more confident in serving the youth that I’m serving in my community.

Fears of Hidden HIV in Rural West Virginia 

Among U.S. states, West Virginia ranks 18th in the rate of new HIV infections. But it may be an incomplete picture, especially in rural communities, where some health officials worry that cases are going undetected.

Among U.S. states, West Virginia ranks 18th in the rate of new HIV infections. But that may not be the full picture, especially in rural communities, where some health officials are concerned that cases are going undetected.

Mingo County, in the far southwest of the state, is illustrative. On a late July morning, Keith Blankenship, the administrator of the Mingo County Health Department, is showing off his state of the art, mobile medical van: a 27-foot Mercedes, with just a few hundred miles on the odometer. 

“It has a refrigerator. All it does lack is a sink; you have to use a portable hand washing station.” Blankenship said as he pointed to a small cart neatly packed with medical items, “We still have some of our supplies in there. We’ve done a lot of testing.” 

Last year, Blankenship sent this van around the county, seeking out people to test for HIV. Over the course of a few months, he estimates they tested around 300 people. Even in that relatively small group, several people tested positive for HIV.

But you wouldn’t know it from the official state tally. West Virginia publishes a regular report showing HIV diagnoses by county. The data is preliminary, but gives health officials an indication of trends and potential trouble spots. For Mingo County, 2022 onwards shows nothing but zeroes, i.e. zero new cases. 

Blankenship knows that’s not accurate, but he also knows that reporting a case requires a second, confirmatory test. Last year, when the county nurse tried to follow up and do a second test on those patients, they were nowhere to be found. Of the people who had tested positive, most were homeless or lacked a permanent address.  

“Most times we only get one shot, or one chance to work with the person,” Blankenship said.  

A spokeswoman for the state Department of Health (WVDH) told us in an email that the agency doesn’t have all the details in Mingo County, but that the agency has staff around the state, who help track people down to conduct confirmatory testing and to connect those patients with care. 

“Even so, there are instances where individuals are not found. This is common among certain at-risk populations where unstable housing or drug misuse may be a factor,” the email read. 

But Mingo County isn’t alone. In Nicholas County, according to Health Officer Anita Stewart, the state only confirmed four HIV cases in the past two years. But Stewart said the official count is just the tip of the iceberg. 

“My concern is that if we have one case, we know that we have at least two to three more that are undiagnosed in our community already,” said Stewart. “And if it’s related to injection drug use, it’s probably higher than that.” 

She said that data showing zero cases in intravenous drug users in Nicholas County does not reflect reality. Asked how big an issue HIV is in Nicholas and other small counties, Stewart replied, “It’s hard to know.”  

One big reason is that in most counties, there is no regular outreach and testing program. As Blankenship explained, “You can’t get numbers if you don’t test for numbers.” 

In Mingo County, the testing program he started is now on hold because the health department no longer has access to the mobile medical unit. Blankenship said the van was on loan from West Virginia’s Center for Threat Preparedness, but last October, he was told he could no longer operate it because there was no money allocated to pay for fuel, licensing, inspections and other maintenance. 

Today, the van is parked in a lot within view of Blankenship’s third-floor office in downtown Williamson.

 “I can look at it every day out my window,” he said. 

The email statement from the WVDH called it “speculation” that there might be more HIV cases than are being reported. But it also said, “HIV testing is essential for improving the health of people living with HIV and reducing new HIV infections,” and that increased screening “is essential for identifying new cases especially amongst high-risk populations, such as individuals who inject drugs.” 

In most rural counties, outreach to people at high risk for HIV involves a patchwork of small organizations. For a large swath of southern West Virginia, the job of knitting them together falls to Brooke Parker, a social worker with the Ryan White Program based at Charleston Area Medical Center. She coordinates efforts across 22 counties, in many cases enlisting local organizations that can conduct testing under what’s known as a CLIA waiver – essentially, an extension of the license to conduct medical testing, held by Charleston Area Medical Center. 

“It means that we can empower smaller groups or volunteers, even though they’re not healthcare providers,” she explained. 

Parker relies heavily on the knowledge of local peer counselors and volunteers. “Our peer recovery coaches in the community are powerhouses,” added Parker. “They know the people better than any of us ever will.”

One July afternoon, Parker headed to Lincoln County, about halfway between Charleston and Huntington. As far as she knows, there’s been no HIV testing in Lincoln County since late last summer. But she’s been connected with a woman who works at a local clinic and wants to help. 

“Lindsy was telling me that she has people regularly asking her, ‘where can I get tested for HIV?’” Parker said. 

Parker’s goal was to conduct a few tests, and to assess whether Lindsy Bias, a peer counselor, is ready to handle a testing program, going forward. 

If she can, Parker said, “This is the targeted testing that I’ve been missing in Lincoln County for a long time.”   

In nine of the past ten years, Lincoln County reported zero HIV cases in intravenous drug users. But between them, Parker and Bias personally know at least two residents who currently receive HIV treatment in either Charleston or Huntington.

 “Our assumption is that there’s more cases than we know about,” said Parker. 

The two women meet for the first time in a parking lot near West Hamlin. Asked if she believes the tally of zero reported cases, Bias scoffs. “It’s because nobody’s getting tested.”  

Parker sets up her gear on the open bed of her pickup truck. It’s a simple, efficient assembly line. The initial finger prick takes blood for an Oraquick rapid HIV test, which produces results in about 20 minutes. She also runs tests for Hepatitis-C, syphilis, and finally a second HIV test, called the INSTI, which delivers results in just 60 seconds.

With two different tests, there’s no issue of having to find the patient to confirm results. Parker makes good use of the waiting period. 

“It’s a point in time where you’ve got someone’s undivided attention,” she said. “I have people sitting with me and talking to me for 15 minutes at a time, which is amazing.” 

She asks about barriers to health care, and about personal risk factors like drug use. 

“Is there an opportunity for harm reduction education to come in? Fifteen minutes is enough time to teach someone how to bleach their syringes,” Parker said. 

After running a few tests in the parking lot, it’s time for a house call. With Bias’ car leading the way, the group turned on a narrow dirt lane and drove another mile until reaching a spot with two small houses and a man in front, wrestling with the engine of a riding mower. Parker backed her truck into the driveway, as men, women and two friendly dogs trickle out to meet us.

Bias knows them all. They’ve been asking her about testing. A tall woman, around 50 years old, helps everyone read and sign the consent paperwork. One by one, they step forward to let Parker prick their fingers. 

The tall woman said it’s been years since she was tested for HIV, which was the last time she went to rehab. She wants to go back, but said she needs to find someone who will take care of her dog while she’s gone. In the meantime she’s nervous about getting an infection, but said she probably wouldn’t have gotten herself tested if not for the home visit.  

Parker has a routine. As each person’s test strip gives results, she asks them to come with her on a short walk, away from the group. She shares the news and answers questions in private. Today, most of the news is good, but a few people test positive for Hepatitis-C. She and Bias explain how treatment works. For those who don’t have insurance, Bias promised to come by the next day with paperwork, to help them sign up. 

It’s a start, but every place presents a fresh challenge. In Nicholas County, “We’re trying to use data to help drive where we test,” Stewart said . 

By closely monitoring the sites of overdoses as well as infections like syphilis and gonorrhea, she aims to focus testing on the people at highest risk, which stretches the budget of her small department. 

“Our resources are very, very limited, whether that’s testing, supplies or staff capacity,” she said.  

In Mingo County, Blankenship is still lobbying state officials to get his mobile unit back on the road. He said he’s just had an encouraging conversation with a senior official at the Center for Threat Preparedness. 

“I’ve got high hopes,” Blankenship said. “I think that everybody involved wants to do the right thing, get it back on the road. As usual, there’s always legalities, but we’re trying to let our voice be heard, that the people of Mingo County deserve that van to be put in use.”

Editor’s Note: This story is part of a series we’re calling “Public Health, Public Trust,” running through August. It is a collaboration with the Global Health Reporting Center and is supported by the Pulitzer Center.  

Martinsburg Physicians Develop New Approaches To Rural Veteran Health Needs

A program at the Martinsburg VA Medical Center trains medical providers to better serve rural veterans, who often face a number of barriers to accessing health resources.

The Martinsburg VA Medical Center (VAMC) serves veterans across county and even state lines.

With such an expansive patient base, the medical center’s health care providers not only have to consider veteran needs, but also disparities in rural health care access — and the ways these experiences overlap.

That is where the VAMC’s local chapter of the national VA Rural Interprofessional Faculty Development Initiative (RIFDI) comes in. The voluntary program trains medical professionals to better serve rural communities, and the veterans who call them home.

Over a two-year period, the program provides physicians lectures, group discussions and project-based learning on rural health care.

So far, three cohorts have completed the program, and RIFDI is still admitting new cohorts of health care providers.

VAMC Deputy Chief of Staff Michael Zapor began the Martinsburg RIFDI program, and said that it helps fill gaps where disparities in veteran and rural health care access overlap.

Veterans living in the rural United States often have less access to stores, transit options and the internet, which limits the health care resources at their disposal, he said.

“When you’re talking about … ‘We’re going to leverage telehealth.’ Even that is not a silver bullet for everybody, because we’ve got some veterans who don’t have computers,” he said.

This requires health care providers to consider the needs of rural veterans across the region and develop strategies to better provide them with health services.

In response, RIFDI considers “innovative ways” to serve the local veteran community, Zapor said. This includes educating veterans on proper nutrition, and offering a mix of in-person and telephone-based services so veterans can choose the resources best suited to their lifestyles.

In developing these strategies, physicians also learn about the health care experiences of the patients they serve.

“We leverage all kinds of ways to be able to project that care out to the more rural remote veterans who may have more difficulty accessing it,” he said.

For more information about RIFDI, visit www.ruralhealth.va.gov.

**Editor’s note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Michael Zapor founded the VA Rural Interprofessional Faculty Development Initiative (RIFDI). Instead, he launched Martinsburg’s local RIFDI program. The story has been updated with the correction.

Exit mobile version