More Postal Workers Affected By Facility Downgrade Than Union Anticipated

As many as 90 postal workers could have their jobs affected by the downgrading of a West Virginia mail facility. This figure is higher than union representatives anticipated.

As many as 90 postal workers could have their jobs affected by the downgrading of a West Virginia mail facility — a figure notably higher than union representatives previously anticipated.

The United States Postal Service (USPS) announced Tuesday that it would carry out plans to transfer outgoing mail processing from the Charleston Processing and Distribution Center to facilities in Pennsylvania.

The decision followed months of deliberation, as well as intense pushback from union workers and state officials concerned with the fate of West Virginia’s only full USPS processing center.

Tim Holstein, vice president of the Charleston-based American Postal Workers Union Local 133, has been an outspoken opponent of the downgrade.

He said union workers worried that more employees would be impacted than the USPS initially estimated. “Multiple members could possibly be relocated or moved out of state, possibly uprooting families and lives,” he told West Virginia Public Broadcasting in February.

When the final report came out on Tuesday, Holstein said workers’ fears were actualized.

In January, the USPS released an initial report that estimated changes to the facility would bring a net decrease of 24 postal workers.

At a first glance, that number is similar to the net decrease of 23 postal workers from the final plans released in April. But the final report also included a breakdown omitted from the initial report.

This laid bare the full extent of changes in store for workers, Holstein said.

Forty-one career employees — 28 career mail processing clerks and 13 career maintenance workers — could be transferred out of the Charleston facility.

In calculating a net decrease, the USPS offset this number with employees gained at the Pittsburgh-area facilities. But Holstein said transferring facilities is not a simple process, and that it might not be a viable option for some employees.

“It’s very difficult to uproot your family and your life, especially if you’ve lived in a particular area, and move to another place that has a higher cost of living,” he said.

The report also said that 25 postal support employees and 24 mail handler assistants could lose their positions. These are non-career roles, which lack the protections of career positions and can be terminated by the USPS.

Positions At Stake

PositionNumber Of Workers AffectedEligible To Be Laid Off?
Mail Processing Clerks28No
Postal Support Employees25Yes
Mail Handler Assistants24Yes
Maintenance Workers13No
According to the United States Postal Service, a total of 90 workers at the Charleston Processing and Distribution Center could have their positions affected in the months ahead.
Graphic Credit: Jack Walker/West Virginia Public Broadcasting

Together, that means a total of 90 career and non-career workers could be impacted through transfers and layoffs, respectively.

Holstein said that by providing just one number — the net decrease — the USPS misrepresented changes to the facility. The net figure was nearly four times lower than the cumulative number of positions impacted.

In an email to West Virginia Public Broadcasting, USPS Spokesperson Susan Wright did not address these claims.

However, she wrote that numbers included in the initial report were based on USPS estimates at the time.

Wright also wrote that “all bargaining employee reassignments will be made in accordance with the respective collective bargaining agreements.”

Still, Holstein said that the release of the final report reignited concerns over USPS transparency among workers.

While the net employee decrease was included prominently on the report’s third page, the full breakdown was included pages into the report, with terms and figures Holstein described as convoluted.

Hours after the report came out, Holstein said he had to pull out a pencil and perform arithmetic to fully grasp the number of positions affected by the downgrade.

“Once you get deeper into the math, you’re finding out that they’re using a net combined number that makes it more palatable for the public … in hopes that we’re not going to start digging into the numbers,” he said.

Union representatives were not alone in expressing disapproval of the final plans. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., released a statement Tuesday expressing concern over how many workers could be impacted.

“I am disappointed that USPS has decided to move forward with plans to shrink the role of the Charleston facility,” she said. “It is also very disappointing to see the number of jobs impacted by these changes has grown from USPS’s initial findings.”

While the USPS describes their plans as final, Holstein said he and fellow workers will continue to challenge them within the boundaries of their positions.

“The fight is not over,” he said. “Until we start to see a relocation or the non-career employees let go, we’re still on the fight. We’re still going to give it 100 percent.”

Tim Holstein said he had to do handwritten arithmetic to understand the full extent of staff changes at the Charleston Processing and Distribution Center.
Photo Credit: Tim Holstein/American Postal Workers Union Local 133

USPS Will Move W.Va. Mail Processing To Pittsburgh, Despite Pushback

The USPS announced Tuesday it will consolidate a South Charleston facility and move some mail processing operations to the Pittsburgh area. The changes follow months of pushback from union representatives.

After months of deliberation, the United States Postal Service (USPS) announced Tuesday that it will consolidate a South Charleston facility and move some mail processing operations to the Pittsburgh area.

The decision follows intense debate over the future of the Charleston Processing and Distribution Center, which is the only full USPS mail processing center in West Virginia.

Plans for the consolidation were announced in fall 2023. Union representatives worried the shift would bring layoffs for temporary employees, or location reassignments for career employees.

They also said mail delivery times could increase for West Virginia residents if processing services were moved out of state.

State lawmakers — plus Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va. — echoed concerns over the consolidation publicly.

But USPS officials have denied claims that delivery times could be impacted by the facility change.

In a press release Tuesday, they also confirmed that no career employees would be laid off through the new plans.

That doesn’t mean workers will be unaffected. Temporary workers could still be laid off through the restructuring, and full-time employees could be reassigned to locations outside Kanawha County.

However, any staff changes will follow collective bargaining agreements from the local postal workers union, according to the USPS press release.

The changes come as part of a ten-year plan from USPS to restructure operations nationally.

Members of the Charleston-based American Postal Workers Union 133 have hosted informational pickets since late 2023 over the proposed downsizing of a local mail processing facility.
Photo Courtesy of Tim Holstein/American Postal Workers Union Local 133

Some union representatives have expressed concerns that the changes will reduce jobs and mail services for rural communities most acutely.

But the West Virginia consolidation also comes with an investment.

According to USPS, nearly $23 million will be invested in the South Charleston facility to modernize services, improve technology and renovate break rooms.

Still, representatives with the Charleston-area American Postal Workers Union Local 133 (APWU) said they do not see the investment as a cause for celebration.

“While it is to no surprise the regurgitated language specified in this release seems to be positive, postal employees across the United States know otherwise,” Tim Holstein, vice president of APWU 133, wrote in a statement provided to West Virginia Public broadcasting.

Holstein wrote that the union’s concerns with increased delivery times and mail costs have not been quashed.

While the USPS might have reached a decision, Holstein said union workers still plan to challenge the changes to come.

“[APWU President Craig] Brown and I will continue fighting this consolidation to the fullest extent our contractual provisions allow,” he wrote.

“We request that members of the public continue to contact their senators, congressmen and congresswomen in opposition to this now planned change.”

After Charleston USPS Hearing, Union Workers Still Have Questions

When United States Postal Service (USPS) officials hosted a public hearing earlier this week, they hoped it would clarify the downsizing plans for a Charleston mail processing facility proposed last fall.

But representatives with the Charleston-based American Postal Workers Union (APWU) 133 said they left the hearing with more questions unanswered.

The Charleston Processing and Distribution Center is the only full USPS mail processing facility in West Virginia. With one final round of public comments on the USPS plans pending, union workers and state lawmakers are voicing concerns over the future of the facility and West Virginia’s mailing industry at large.

Changes To The Charleston Facility

Droves of concerned residents and postal workers filed into the Charleston Coliseum and Convention Center for the hearing Wednesday.

It came on the heels of months of intense protest beginning in the fall of 2023, when the USPS officials shared plans to move some local postal operations to Pennsylvania.

Findings published in January outlined these changes. The report said that certain West Virginia-based mail operations, like handling letters and smaller packages, would be transferred to Pittsburgh-area facilities.

It also stated that millions of dollars would be invested in improvements to the facility, like new mail sorting equipment and refurbished restroom and break room areas.

But Tim Holstein, vice president of APWU 133, said the need for these facility improvements reflects an already strained relationship between local workers and USPS officials.

“My question to the postal service is, if we’re concerned about LED lighting, better bathrooms and break rooms for employees, what have we been doing the last 30 years since that building has been there?” Holstein said.

According to Holstein, union frustrations with the USPS span longer than a few months. But the new slate of proposed changes has thrown into relief worries that union employees continue to hold.

A livestream of the USPS public hearing Wednesday evening shows community members and postal workers arising to address USPS officials and ask questions.
Credit: Courtesy of Tim Holstein/American Postal Workers Union 133

Union And Community Concerns

The proposed changes to the Charleston facility would bring no layoffs for career employees, according to the USPS findings.

In an email to West Virginia Public Broadcasting, Susan Wright — a USPS spokeswoman — said the initial plans would only affect 24 career employees, and that they would remain employed by the organization.

Wright did not specify what career changes might come for these employees. But Holstein said alternatives to layoffs, like transferring to another state, do not reflect the best interests of workers.

“We’re concerned that there possibly could be one of our members, if not more,” he said. “Multiple members could possibly be relocated or moved out of state, possibly uprooting families and lives.”

Debby Szeredy, executive vice president of the national APWU, visited Charleston to speak at Wednesday’s hearing. She said it is important that the USPS keeps these jobs local.

“These are good jobs for this community, and we don’t deserve to have them gone,” she said.

Additionally, both Holstein and Szeredy expressed concern that the changes would affect delivery times for West Virginia residents.

USPS officials have disputed this claim. During the hearing, USPS Coordinator Ted Hanson said “delivery services will be unaffected” by operational changes to the facility.

According to Wright, changes to the Charleston facility are part of a ten-year plan to enhance the USPS nationally through operational restructuring.

But Szeredy said that, time and time again, these changes only affect rural facilities and the communities that depend on them.

“Charleston does not deserve this. It’s actually very discriminatory, the case that all these rural sites are on our list,” she said. “There’s a number of them besides Charleston.”

Picketers line the roads of Charleston to voice concerns over potential layoffs at the state’s only USPS mail processing facility.
Credit: Courtesy of Tim Holstein/American Postal Workers Union 133

Eroding Trust

Holstein said that the buildup to Wednesday’s hearing has only exacerbated union frustrations with national USPS officials.

The hearing was initially slated for January, but was delayed with less than a week’s notice. It was rescheduled for Feb. 14, a holiday, and came after the USPS had already released its initial findings.

Together, Holstein said that these actions reflected an apathy on the part of the USPS toward union concerns.

“We believe that they did that with the malicious intent to keep the public away from hearing the truth,” he said.

Even lawmakers have taken part in voicing concern over how the hearing transpired.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va, published an op-ed in the Charleston Gazette-Mail condemning the USPS “for not sufficiently communicating with stakeholders and impacted communities before final decisions are made.”

“I’m disappointed that we didn’t have that public hearing before they put their findings out,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., told West Virginia Public Broadcasting Thursday. “That concerns me.”

USPS officials have stated they rescheduled the hearing because they needed more time to compile their findings, but Holstein said that the distrust it planted in union workers remains.

Meanwhile, Wright wrote that she and fellow USPS representatives understand the frustration local postal workers have for the proposed restructuring. “Change is uncomfortable and concerning for most people,” she wrote.

“It is important for our customers and employees to understand the [ten-year plan] is focused on improving all aspects of the Postal Service to ensure we are financially secure and operationally efficient for our immediate and long-term future,” she wrote.

But Holstein said that, until national USPS representatives are willing to work with his union to develop solutions by and for the local community, it is hard to believe they have workers’ best interest at heart.

“The problem is, the postal service has not approached the union in any sort of effort to try to make these changes, or to see what we can implement together as one to be productive,” Holstein said. “They haven’t done that.”

“Until they do that, obviously we look at this as a loss of trust,” he said.

Senate Voices Support For South Charleston Mail Center Facing Downsizing

Amid controversy surrounding the potential closure of West Virginia’s only mail processing center in South Charleston, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution expressing their support of the center’s preservation.

A controversial plan to move West Virginia’s only mail processing center to neighboring Pennsylvania brought a storm of backlash for the United States Postal Service (USPS).

The fallout in late 2023 led USPS officials to suggest instead downsizing the South Charleston center, and moving select operations out of state. But lawmakers are critical of the idea because of the economic opportunities the center currently provides.

On Friday, the West Virginia Senate unanimously passed Senate Resolution 16, which expressed support for the center’s preservation in Kanawha County.

Sen. Eric Nelson Jr., R-Kanawha, said that the center’s location in West Virginia reduces shipping times for West Virginia, and provides important employment opportunities for West Virginia families.

“We’ve talked about so many economic benefits of new jobs here in the last three or four years,” Nelson said during the Senate’s legislative session on Friday. “Well let’s talk about job retention: 800 jobs and their families and those that they touch.”

The USPS will host a meeting at the Charleston Coliseum and Convention Center on Jan. 30, where it will accept public comments on current plans.

Nelson encouraged fellow lawmakers to attend the meeting and show their support for local postal workers.

A Talk With Manchin And Postal Workers Union Hopes To Prevent Closure At W.Va. Processing Center, This West Virginia Morning

On this West Virginia Morning, U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin announced his retirement from the Senate last month. Curtis Tate spoke with Manchin earlier this week about that decision – what he wants to do next and what he accomplished during his time in office.

On this West Virginia Morning, U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin announced his retirement from the Senate last month. Curtis Tate spoke with Manchin earlier this week about that decision – what he wants to do next and what he accomplished during his time in office.

Also, in this show, Postal Workers Union leaders say the fight is intensifying to prevent the possible closure or downsizing of the state’s mail processing center. Randy Yohe has more.

And, our Mountain Stage Song of the Week comes to us from our 2021 Holiday Special. We listen to “Maybe This Christmas” by Holly Cole.

West Virginia Morning is a production of West Virginia Public Broadcasting which is solely responsible for its content.

Support for our news bureaus comes from Shepherd University.

Our Appalachia Health News project is made possible with support from CAMC and Marshall Health.

West Virginia Morning is produced with help from Bill Lynch, Briana Heaney, Caroline MacGregor, Chris Schulz, Curtis Tate, Emily Rice, Eric Douglas, Liz McCormick, and Randy Yohe.

Eric Douglas is our news director and our producer this week.

Listen to West Virginia Morning weekdays at 7:43 a.m. on WVPB Radio or subscribe to the podcast and never miss an episode. #WVMorning

Probation For W.Va. Mail Carrier In Absentee Ballot Case

A West Virginia postal carrier who pleaded guilty to altering mail-in requests for absentee voter ballots was sentenced to five years’ probation Monday.

Thomas Cooper was charged in May 2020 after eight mail-in requests for absentee voter ballots had their party affiliations altered. He pleaded guilty last July.

Cooper, 48, of Dry Fork, held a postal contract to pick up mail in the three towns in which the voters live and delivered the forms in April 2020 to the Pendleton County clerk, according to a federal affidavit.

An investigation by the secretary of state’s office found five of the ballot requests were changed from Democrat to Republican with a black ink pen, the affidavit said.

Bennie Cogar, a state attorney general’s office investigator who conducted the probe on behalf of the secretary of state’s office, said in the affidavit that the Pendleton County clerk called some of the voters after receiving the requests because she knew they were not Republicans. The clerk then contacted the secretary of state’s office to report the alterations.

On the other three requests, the voters’ party was not changed. However, in addition to the “Republican” box originally checked in blue ink, the word “Republican” was later circled in black ink, the affidavit said.

Cooper admitted in an interview with Cogar and a postal inspector that he changed some of the requests he picked up from the Onega post office from Democrat to Republican.

According to the affidavit, when he was then asked about the other requests, Cooper said, “I’m not saying no,” but if the requests were picked up along his postal route, “I would take the blame.” Cooper was then asked if he was “just being silly” and he replied he did it “as a joke” and that he didn’t know those voters.

Cooper was sentenced in federal court in Elkins for attempted election fraud and injury to the mail.

State Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said Cooper’s conviction and sentencing “should serve as a strong warning to anyone else who feels tempted to commit election fraud.”

Absentee ballot rules were relaxed last year to make voting easier and safer during the coronavirus pandemic. Absentee ballot applications were mailed to all registered voters in West Virginia to encourage mail-in voting for the June 2020 primary election. For the November general election, all state voters were allowed to fill out an absentee ballot application online.

Exit mobile version