‘Intelligent Design’ Bill Signed Into Law

A new law tries to define how a teacher might answer a student’s question of how life began. Senate Bill 280 says a public school teacher is not prohibited from responding to questions about scientific theories of how the universe and or life came to exist.

A new law tries to define how a teacher might answer a student’s question of how life began. Senate Bill 280 says a public school teacher is not prohibited from responding to questions about scientific theories of how the universe and or life came to exist.  

Dubbed the “intelligent design” bill, supporters say they hope the vaguely written legislation would open the door to teaching divine creation alongside evolution.

President of the American Federation of Teachers of West Virginia Fred Albert said the bill does nothing, since intelligent design is theology, not science. 

“This was another bill that was looking for an answer for something that doesn’t really exist,” Albert said. “Teachers answer many questions throughout the course of the day, and I think we should trust our teachers’ value in what they do in the classroom and believe that they’re going to make the right choices in how they answer questions of their students.”

Albert said there will be no ”chilling” effect, or any teacher fear of how they answer questions. He said teachers will continue open discussions about the beginning of life.  

“Most teachers would be honest in their responses to a child,” Albert said. “Sometimes your answer is that your own foundation is what you believe, but you don’t try to persuade someone else in a classroom to believe what your beliefs are. A teacher would say, ‘this whole subject of how we came into being is very controversial, and perhaps this is something that you should talk with your family about.’”

A 2005 federal ruling found presenting intelligent design as an alternative to evolution was unconstitutional because it expressed a Christian viewpoint. 

Senate Passes Intelligent Design Bill For Public Classrooms

In 2005 a U.S District Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to teach intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in public classrooms. A  bill passed by the state Senate Tuesday challenges that ruling. 

In 2005 a U.S District Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to teach intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in public classrooms. A bill passed by the state Senate Tuesday challenges that ruling. 

Senate Bill 280 allows teachers to discuss one or more theories about the origins of life on earth, including theories that life was created and designed by a higher power. Sen. Amy Grady, R-Mason, and the bill’s author, says the bill allows teachers to answer questions that widely accepted scientific theories can’t answer. 

“We do not want to discourage students from asking questions about theories,” Grady said. “The definition for theory is that there is some data that proves something to be true, but it doesn’t have to be proven entirely true. Even with Darwin’s theory of evolution, there are scientists who doubt that, based on evidence of fossils.”

However, Sen. Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, says it is a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the establishment clause that separates church and state. 

“There is plenty of case law out there from Republican judges,” Woelfel said. “The Kitzmiller case jumps out at me, that intelligent design has been struck as impermissible to be taught in public schools. Because of the creative, the prime being, the god, the supernatural, creationism is outside the realm of established scientific theories.”

If it becomes law, West Virginia would be the first state to permit intelligent design theory in public classrooms since it was barred as unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court. If the case were brought to a higher court, the litigation could cost taxpayers. 

Exit mobile version