Federal Court Throws Out Key Mountain Valley Pipeline Permit

The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with environmental groups Tuesday and threw out a major federal water crossings permit for the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

Environmental advocates said the move could significantly slow down construction through much of West Virginia and is expected to affect about 160 miles of the pipeline’s route in the state.

In an order released just days after the court heard the case Friday, the court vacated the pipeline’s water-crossings permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Huntington District. The district encompasses much of the state, including the southern region, and the order affects major river crossings for the Elk, Gauley, Greenbrier and Meadow rivers.

History in the Courts

The Nationwide Permit 12 allows pipeline developers to disrupt streams, rivers and wetlands during construction, while maintaining water quality standards under the federal Clean Water Act.

The court in June halted construction of the 303-mile pipeline under bodies of water, because the pipeline developer’s own documents showed they could not complete construction quickly enough to comply with the federal Army Corps permit.

In late August, hours after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission decided construction could continue more broadly across the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s route, the 4th Circuit lifted its stay on water crossings in West Virginia.

‘Major Win’

But on Monday, the same court agreed with arguments made by environmental groups that the Army Corps erred when it allowed pipeline developers to use the “dry cut” method to install the pipeline through rivers and streams. That method includes damming the water source before pipeline installation and can take 4 to 6 weeks.

West Virginia environmental regulators proposed additional stipulations on the pipeline under the Nationwide Permit 12. The state requires all stream crossing be done within 72 hours.

“We conclude, for reasons to be more fully explained in a forthcoming opinion, that the Corps lacked authority to substitute the ‘dry cut’ requirement ‘in lieu of’ West Virginia’s 72-hour temporal restriction,”  the order stated.

The West Virginia DEP is currently weighing whether it should change the 72-hour special consideration for pipeline stream and river crossings.

Environmental groups called the decision a major win. In an emailed statement, Appalachian Mountain Advocates said it will “significantly impede construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline for the foreseeable future.”

They said the Army Corps will likely have to do additional environmental analysis and will likely be required to issue a project-specific Clean Water Act permit or “individual” permit, rather than the more general Nationwide Permit 12.

The Nationwide Permit 12 covers all stream and wetland disruptions caused by utility line construction nationwide. It is one of about 50 broader so-called “general permits” that can be granted under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.

Mountain Valley Pipeline spokeswoman Natalie Cox said in an email that developers were “disappointed” by the decision.

She said project developers are “evaluating options to understand its ability to continue with construction activities that do not include stream and wetland crossings along this portion of the route.”

Atlantic Coast Pipeline Permit Under Fire from Environmental Advocates

Environmental advocates asked a federal court Tuesday to review a federal permit for the 600-mile Atlantic Coast Pipeline.

Appalachian Mountain Advocates, a law firm representing a coalition of environmental and citizen groups, filed a petition with the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The groups, which include the Sierra Club, West Virginia Rivers Coalition, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Appalachian Voices and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, are asking the court to review a federal permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers.

The Nationwide Permit 12, which falls under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, sets out how the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) must be built through streams and wetlands in West Virginia.

In a letter sent last month to Army Corps’ Huntington District, the groups argue the pipeline developer has admitted it cannot cross parts of the Greenbrier, West Fork and Buckhannon rivers in the 72-hour time frame mandated by the permit, and thus its Nationwide Permit 12 should be revoked.

The request comes days after the 4th Circuit stayed the same permit issued to the Mountain Valley Pipeline for failing to complete construction quickly enough.

Once completed, the 600-mile, 42-inch ACP pipeline will bring natural gas from West Virginia through Virginia to North Carolina. The ACP is being jointly developed by Dominion Energy, Duke Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas and Southern Company Gas.

A spokesperson for the ACP could not be reached for comment.

Environmental Advocates Ask FERC to Revoke Mountain Valley Pipeline Approval

Environmental advocates yesterday asked federal regulators to suspend construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP).

 

Appalachian Mountain Advocates, on behalf of a coalition of environmental and citizen groups, sent a letter Tuesday to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requesting the federal agency revoke its approval of the MVP.

 

The 303-mile pipeline’s route crosses state lines as it travels from northern West Virginia down to Virginia, which gives FERC partial jurisdiction over construction activities.

Credit Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
/

The request comes just days after the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appealshalted some construction of the natural gas pipeline in West Virginia, siding with conservation groups who challenged the pipeline’s water-crossings permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Specifically, the court stayed the pipeline’s federal Clean Water Act Section 404 permit that was issued by the Army Corps. The Corps granted the MVP a Nationwide Permit 12, a broader permit under the law.

 

It covers nearly 600 stream and wetland disruptions planned by the pipeline in the agency’s Huntington district, which covers all planned construction activity in West Virginia.

Environmental groups argued the MVP’s own planning documents showed river crossing for the Elk, Gauley, Greenbrier and Meadow rivers would take 4-6 weeks to complete and could not comply with the permit’s 72-hour deadline. The federal appeals court agreed.

In the letter to FERC, Appalachian Mountain Advocates stated that because of the federal appeals court decision last week, the pipeline no longer has all of the federal authorizations it needs and thus FERC’s approval, known as a Certificate Order, should be suspended.

“Because that mandatory federal authorization is now lacking, FERC must not allow pipeline construction to continue, not only within the Corps’ Huntington District but anywhere along the pipeline route,” they wrote.

Tamara Young-Allen, a spokeswoman for FERC, confirmed the agency had directed the MVP to halt construction in the Huntington District per the federal court’s order, but declined to comment on the recent letter.

MVP spokeswoman Natalie Cox did not respond to a request for comment.

Environmental groups yesterday also petitioned the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, requesting it review the Army Corps’ Nationwide Permit 12 issued for the Virginia section of the MVP.

 

 

 

 

 

Court Hears Arguments in West Virginia Stream Cleanup Case

A federal appeals court was urged Tuesday to overturn a ruling by a judge who found that the state of West Virginia has abandoned its responsibility to write cleanup plans for streams harmed by pollution from mountaintop-removal coal mining.

The judge’s 2017 ruling said the state Department of Environmental Protection has dragged its feet for years on plans required under the federal Clean Water Act.

In arguments before a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a Justice Department lawyer representing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said West Virginia intends to draft the cleanup plans, but has been working to satisfy a 2012 state law that requires broadening the way it determines the biological health of streams.

“This is a hard issue. This is a new issue,” said attorney James Maysonett of the Justice Department’s Environment & Natural Resources Division. “West Virginia has a schedule to get this done.”

Derek Teaney, senior attorney for Appalachian Mountain Advocates, said the law does not require the state to develop the new assessment tool before it submits cleanup plans for the streams affected by pollution from mining.

The group sued the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection on behalf of the Sierra Club, the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and the West Virginia Rivers Coalition.

“We are trying to compel agency action,” Teaney said.

In court documents, the group contends that the state has refused to develop “total maximum daily loads,” which are plans for restoring impaired waters that identify the maximum amount of a pollutant a stream can receive while still meeting water-quality standards.

The streams have been designated as “biologically impaired” because of diminished levels of aquatic life. The environmental groups say the state Department of Environmental Protection has identified the cause of the diminished aquatic life in nearly 200 of those streams to toxicity related to mining pollution.

The Clean Water Act requires states to develop the plans for any stream that does not meet water-quality standards. If a state doesn’t develop a satisfactory plan, the law requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to step in and come up with a plan.

The 4th Circuit did not indicate when it will issue its ruling.
 

Landowners File Suit Over Pipeline Surveys

Some southern West Virginia landowners who were threatened with legal action for not allowing pipeline surveyors onto their property have filed their own lawsuits.

Lawyer Derek Teaney, with Appalachian Mountain Advocates, filed paperwork Wednesday on behalf of three couples in Monroe and Summers counties.

Teaney is asking the circuit court in each county to stop surveyors working on the Mountain Valley Pipeline from coming onto his clients’ property.

The company sent letters threatening legal action to landowners who refused to allow surveyors access to their property in late January. The company said the landowners had until March 9 to comply or face unspecified legal action. To date, the company hasn’t taken any action.

The letters cited West Virginia’s eminent domain law in requesting access to the properties.

The lawsuits filed Wednesday say that because the pipeline company doesn’t provide a service to West Virginians, it doesn’t have a right to eminent domain. Therefore, the lawsuits say, the pipeline company can’t force landowners to allow surveyors onto their property.

Teaney said he can’t comment on ongoing litigation. Mountain Valley spokeswoman Natalie Cox said the company is aware of the lawsuits. She said Mountain Valley will review them and respond accordingly.

West Virginia DEP Ordered to Release Pollution Data

  A judge says the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection violated the state’s Freedom of Information Act when it denied a law firm’s request for water pollution data.

Kanawha County Circuit Court Judge Charles King ordered the DEP this week to provide the data to Appalachian Mountain Advocates.

The law firm sued the DEP after the agency denied its 2013 request for the most recent quarterly data showing water pollution levels at coal mines statewide. In the past, the DEP provided similar data in a spreadsheet format.

The DEP denied the latest request and referred the law firm to a searchable agency website. To provide the data, the agency said it would have to research its databases and create a new record.

The Charleston Gazette reported King’s ruling.

Exit mobile version