Sen. Joe Manchin On Why He Can’t Support Trump, But Isn’t Sold On Biden

West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin talks to NPR’s Michel Martin about Joe Biden, Donald Trump and Nikki Haley, and his decisions against another run for the Senate or a new bid for president.

Listen to this story on NPR.

At 76, West Virginia senator Joe Manchin waves off the concerns of some of his colleagues about a candidate’s age and how it might affect their ability to carry out the responsibilities of office.

“I don’t look at age,” the democratic senator told NPR’s Michel Martin. “I look at [candidates] person by person. And with Joe Biden, every time I’ve been with him, we’ve talked, I’ve had no problem whatsoever”.

He is, however, reluctant to back the President in the 2024 election.

“I’m hoping that the Joe Biden that I know, the Joe Biden that I’ve known for a long time will come back,” Manchin told Morning Edition.

As a self described “conservative Democrat,” Manchin has frequently played spoiler to some of Biden’s key legislative initiatives – in 2021 he refused to support the Biden administration’s Build Back Better bill, even after the White House made multiple concessions in an effort to assuage his concerns. He similarly withheld his vote from Biden’s federal voting rights, climate-change agendas and tax reform policies by refusing to join with fellow Democrats in an evenly divided Senate.

“I can tell you it’s difficult being in the middle,” Manchin said. “…A 50/50 Senate, it’s not an enviable place to be at all.”

Last week, the senator announced that he won’t be running for the presidency in 2024 after flirting with a third party bid for months. During his announcement, he declined to endorse Biden or any other candidate, although he did offer praise to Trump’s lone GOP rival, the former U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley.

“I think Nikki is spot on,” Manchin said, regarding Haley’s remarks critical of Trump in a speech on Tuesday.

Senator Manchin joined Michel Martin days after announcing his own decision not to seek the presidential nomination in 2024. He spoke of his legacy after 15 years in elective office, and his hesitancy to endorse another 2024 presidential hopeful – at least for now. Below are some of the highlights from that interview.

This interview has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.

On why he isn’t planning to run for president

It’s hard with the Democratic Party and Republican parties being the businesses that they are in Washington today, and I mean businesses, these are big billion dollar businesses that have picked their product.and pretty much have gone in the direction of choosing who they think that would be their strongest product, if you will. And that’s what they’re going to go with. And I, I just don’t fit in the Democrats process and they are doing things or the Republican process. I’ve always been independent minded.

And so I thought about that. And I’ve been with the No Labels Group since 2010, because I think they’re a wonderful group. They are trying to always give an opportunity for that middle minded person to have a venue. I’ve appreciated that they’ve been working and moving towards putting a unity ticket together. I think that it’s trying to give an option, which is good. I just believe right now this timing wasn’t right for me and I didn’t want to be a spoiler.

On why he won’t support President Biden

I think President Biden and his team have to look around them and ask, how did he win in 2020? Look at the rhetoric that was used back then. It’s not extreme. Everything that was said and everything he showed people was what he’d done through his experience being in the Senate and then being vice president. And [voters] said, “Yeah, this man is more moderate than most, he’s easy to work with. He looks at the facts and makes decisions.”That’s what he had been known for. And now I think people believe that he has gone too far to the left.

I think [we should be] putting ourselves back in a moderate, centrist position where people feel comfortable – they don’t think they’re being pushed and being overregulated. They don’t think that you have the finger or your thumb on the scale and are moving things too far to the left.

I think about how we deal with how we deal with crime in this country, how we deal with the border, how we deal with the fiscal responsibilities that we have. I think that no one’s taking the debt of this nation as seriously as they should. I think the greatest challenge that we have is getting our finances under control. And that means you just can’t spend like a drunken sailor.

[Biden’s team] keeps playing to the base versus where the voters are going to be. This next election will be decided by moderate, centrist, independent voters. They’re not talking to them.

On why he won’t support former President Donald Trump

I have said there’s no way I could support or vote for Donald Trump. I think it would be very detrimental to our country, and to our world standing. We have enough things in upheaval.

I just thought it was horrendous when a former president could not have condolences to a family that lost a 47 year old husband, a father and a son in a country that basically just eliminates their opposition. And when former President Trump couldn’t even say ‘my heart goes out to the Navalny family’ It’s wrong. There’s nothing right about this. But he keeps very silent and doesn’t say a word. It seems like he kind of admires the people that operate and govern that way, such as Putin. It scares the bejesus out of me.

I would consider anyone that truly puts their country before themselves and wants to bring people together. But you when you start denigrating and villainizing other people. And when hatred and revenge is going to be basically your mode of operation. That’s not right. There’s nothing normal about that.

On the legacy of his last term in Congress

It’s a shame to go out and the 118th Congress will go down as absolutely the least productive Congress in the history of the United States of America. That’s a sad scenario. Only 39 bills have been passed so far. We usually pass an average of about 523 bills every two years.

The 117th Congress was one of the most productive and one of the most monumental 118th will be the worst. And that’s a shame.

I have been very adamantly supportive of trying to give every American a chance to have a quality of life, no matter what the race to matter what their religion, no matter what their sexual preferences. But when you try to normalize, those are on the extremes which might be on a different path or taking in life, that makes it hard. When [the government] tries to push that into the mainstream, people reject it. And that’s not the government’s role. And I’ve said this all my life. I never have believed the government would be my provider. Government was my partner, whether it be local, municipalities, local, county, local and a state government. They were not my provider, nor did I expect them to be. But I hope [government] had the compassion and the moral values of helping those who couldn’t help themselves. That’s basically who I am and what I’ve always tried to do and what I always will do.

The audio version of this interview was produced by Kaity Kline and edited by Mohamad ElBardicy. The digital version was edited by Jacob Conard

Local Activist Recounts Trip To Cuba

Since the 1960s, the U.S. embargo on Cuba has prevented American businesses from conducting trade with Cuban interests. Travel by U.S. citizens to the island has also been significantly limited. Earlier this year, a young West Virginian member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation traveled to Cuba on a humanitarian mission. Reporter Chris Schulz sat down with Jack Tensley to talk about his trip.

Since the 1960s, the U.S. embargo on Cuba has prevented American businesses from conducting trade with Cuban interests. Travel by U.S. citizens to the island has also been significantly limited.

Earlier this year, a young West Virginian member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation traveled to Cuba on a humanitarian mission.

Reporter Chris Schulz sat down with Jack Tensley to talk about his trip.

The transcript below has been lightly edited for clarity.

Schulz: Obviously socialism is in the name of the party that you’re affiliated with, the Party for Socialism and Liberation. Can you give me just a brief definition, or what you understand that movement to be?

Tensley: The definition really is workers controlling the means of production. We are advocating for workers, working class people, which is the majority of Americans. Those are the people who don’t own the means of production: businesses, corporations, textile plants, all of those things. We want to see them in political control of not just the country, but their lives. 

When people have control, they have democracy. We really, very strongly believe in democracy, and socialism and democracy go hand in hand. We trust them to know what they are doing with their work. We’d like to give that power back to people so they can have self-determination of their lives. They can decide what needs to be produced, how it needs to be produced, and whose needs need to be filled. But if we could decide as workers, ‘Oh, no, we want that money to go towards roads and schools and health care,’ then we can really see those kinds of benefits.

Schulz: Tell me a little bit about what you do as a group.

Tensley: We do our organizing in the Eastern Panhandle, mostly in Martinsburg. We do a lot of community engagement. We currently have a fun clean streets campaign. And it’s like our biggest campaign at the moment. And we spent a while knocking on doors and just asking people like, ‘What would you like to see change in your neighborhood?’ It’s really important that we hear from the people about what they want, and what they would like to see change, and then we advocate for that, and we try to help them get that. Also, at the same time teach them about working class unity, it’s part of the democracy and the self-determination that’s inherent in socialism. 

When we first started door knocking a long time ago, we were like, ‘Oh, gosh, who knows what people are gonna say when they see our shirts?’ But most people were like, ‘Oh, you care? Well, cool. Nobody, Democrats, Republicans, council, they don’t ever knock on our doors.’ We’ve had really positive responses from the community.

Schulz:  So it sounds like your action, your group is very locally minded, or at least you’re acting very locally. So how does that translate into an international trip?

Tensley: We are part of the Cuba-Venezuela Solidarity Committee, they also send a youth brigade for May Day, which is one of the most important holidays in Cuba. It’s a solidarity committee, we’re able to bring material goods, like building equipment and medicine, things like that. Alice Walker, who wrote ‘The Color Purple,’ paid for a shipping container to bring, I think it was something like 40,000 pounds of construction material that we helped deliver. 

During the day, we were traveling around and going to the spots, but at nighttime, after the tours, and visiting is over, we can go do whatever we want. I just went out and talked to every stranger I could talk to and ask them as many questions as I could. The Cuban people want us to see what it’s like, the effects of the blockade, and how that impacts their lives on a day-to-day basis, and then bring those stories back home. We only hear one side, and it’s heavily, heavily edited. To be able to come back and tell people about, ‘This is what I saw firsthand.’ That’s kind of what they wanted from us.

Schulz: You mentioned earlier that people are struggling because of the blockade, because of the embargo. Materially, what did they tell you about how that is affecting them in their day-to-day life?

Tensley: It’s really super plain to see. When I first got to Cuba I was staying in a hotel. When I looked out the window, every building that I can see had rain barrels on top of it, because they catch their rain, and then they filter it and they use that for water. Because they don’t have the plumbing pumps, just the pumps to pump water to move it so they have to use gravity. 

When the Soviet Union collapsed, that was basically Cuba’s trading partner and they kind of stopped there. They’ve just been repairing things ever since because the United States embargo, you know, won’t allow trade to happen. Just walking around Havana, most of the buildings looked like they were ready to to fall over. There’s exposed rebar, concrete was cracked. And in all these places, people are still living in these buildings. We brought in ibuprofen, stuff that simple. But they can’t trade for a large amount. They can’t make their own ibuprofen, they can’t trade for anybody else’s ibuprofen. And that’s just something that we take for granted. 

Every day it was something else. And by the end of a couple of days, you see, ‘Oh my god, this has piled up so much on these people’ who continue to live and laugh and smile, and these people were out having a good time. But, at the same time, I really struggle with the day-to-day things that we take for granted. That was one of the messages they wanted us to bring back. Yeah, they’re gonna keep on resisting, they’re not gonna let the United States just make the whole goal of the embargo is to make life unbearable for the Cuban people. So they overthrow the government.

Schulz: Did you see any parallels or did anything strike you as kind of similar to what you’ve seen here?

Tensley: Well, I worked for maybe two and a half years in West Virginia as a paramedic. There are so many neighborhoods that I went into that had the same level of material goods that the Cuban people had. When I was in Cuba, it was almost hard for me to notice how much material they lacked, like how rundown things were, because I am used to living in Martinsburg, and I’m used to seeing what poor people live like, and what oppressed people live like. I was like, ‘Well, yeah, this isn’t too different.’ It looks the same on the surface, but when you start to look at it a little bit deeper, I can see how people can go to Cuba and feel bad for those people. But after spending a couple of days there, I felt worse for us, because we have the ability to solve these problems, and they do not get solved because the people are not in charge. 

That’s what socialism really offers. It brings people together, that makes people strong. And when we’re strong, we can take care of each other. Cuba is this place where they have none of the material goods that we have, but they’re so much stronger than we are as a people, they’re healthier. They live longer, infant mortality rates are lower, mother’s mortality rate is lower, just a better place, healthier place to be. Compare that to the richest country on planet Earth and look at our statistics. There’s no argument there. 

Socialism, that’s the answer. I don’t want people to be scared of whatever they heard on the news. I want them to find actual organizers in their communities and their neighborhoods, talk to them, ask them questions, learn from them, and then learn how we can work together to forge a better path forward.

What the Third Parties Have to Offer in the Race for U.S. Senate

When voters take to the polling place this November, they’ll decide between five candidates vying for Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s seat in the U.S. Senate. Most will recognize the names ‘Tennant’ and ‘Capito,’ but what about Baber, Buckley, and Hudok?

The three third party candidates for Senate, Bob Henry Baber of the Mountain Party, John Buckley of the Libertarian Party and Phil Hudok of the Constitution Party, talk about what they have to offer West Virginians when representing them at the federal level. 

They discuss the economy, the environment and healthcare, as well as why it’s important to include their voices in the overall debate.

Dr. Neil Berch of West Virginia University and Dr. George Davis of Marshall University discuss the history of third parties in the country and if including their voices help or hurts the political process.

Dave Boucher of the Charleston Daily Mail and Mandi Cardosi of the State Journal wrap up the show with a discussion of the Supreme Court’s decision this week to add a replacement candidate to the ballot in the House of Delegates 35th District race.

Exit mobile version