Capito Urges EPA Administrator to Make C-8 Report Public

Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito pressed the head of the Environmental Protection Agency Wednesday over recently released emails that show White House and EPA officials attempted to delay a new federal standard for C-8 and other similar toxic water-polluting chemicals, which have for decades been detected in several water systems in the Ohio Valley.

At a Senate budget hearing, Capito asked EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to clarify why some agency officials expressed concern over more stringent standard for exposure levels of C-8. The changes have been proposed by researchers at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR), a division of the Department of Health and Human Services. They came to light recently when a series of emails were made public.

The emails, which were obtained by the Union of Concerned Scientists through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, show ASTDR intends to release a report stating toxic prefluorinated chemicals, sometimes called PFOA or C-8, are not safe at levels lower than currently adopted by EPA.

EPA currently has a health advisory in place for PFOA and PFOS which recommends against drinking water with more than 70 parts per trillion, or ppt, of the chemicals.

According to the emails, ATSDR is considering standards ranging from 12 ppt to 516 ppt for a variety of fluorinated chemicals. When the proposal was flagged, EPA, White House and Department of Defense officials scrambled to block the release of ATSDR’s toxicology report. One official called the report a “public relations nightmare.

The new standards would not be legally binding, but used as a screening tool at hazardous waste sites.

Pruitt denied having knowledge that EPA officials had concerns and said the agency will hold a summit on C-8 next week.

I was not aware that there had been some holding back of the report,” Pruitt testified. “I think it’s important to have all information in the marketplace to evaluate this.”

Capito encouraged Pruitt to allow the report to be made public.

“Well I think you’re in a position to really, with your strong statement here today, to encourage this information to come forward to see, and then to look at it in the larger context of your meeting for next week,” she said.

Communities across the Ohio Valley have for decades dealt with C-8 contamination. The chemicals are used to make non-stick pans and are found in firefighting foam. Kidney and testicular cancer, pregnancy-induced hypertension and thyroid disease are some of the health impacts linked to exposure of PFOA.

Pruitt said the agency intends to “take more concrete action” on C-8. That may include classifying the chemicals as hazardous under the 1980 law that established the Superfund program, which would allow EPA to require responsible parties to pay for clean-up.

The agency is also weighing creating a legal drinking water threshold for PFOA and PFOS, he said.

EPA Announces $2.8 Million in Grants to Revitalize Polluted Sites in W.Va.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has awarded West Virginia nearly $3 million for assessment, remediation and planning work on contaminated properties across the state.

The EPA’s Brownfields Program is aimed at helping communities expand their ability to recycle polluted properties for new, productive reuses.

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said in a news release that “these grants leverage other public and private investments and improve local economies through property cleanup and redevelopment.”

$200,000 was awarded to Southern Coal Camp Authority for cleanup of former Burch High and Middle Schools.

Additionally, $200,000 was also given to the City of Fairmont and Fayette County for a Community-Wide Assessment.

The Region 2 Planning & Development Council based in Huntington was awarded $600,000 for its Coalition Assessment.

And both the cities of Weirton and Huntington were given $800,000 for a Community-Wide Revolving Loan Fund.

Pruitt Questioned about Climate, Dark Money During Confirmation Hearing

President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt faced questions from Senators in his confirmation hearing Wednesday.

Climate change, coal and gas dominated the questioning as the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works interviewed Pruitt. The attorney general from Oklahoma has spent a lot of time fighting against many federal environmental regulations — including the current EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which is the first federal policy of its kind designed to slow greenhouse gas emissions.

While Pruitt said he does not believe climate change is a hoax, when asked by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont if he disagreed with the majority of scientists who say the earth’s climate is changing as a result of human activities, Pruitt responded that his personal opinion is “immaterial.”

Pruitt also largely skirted questions about possible conflicts of interest. Rhode Island Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse pointed out thousands of email correspondences, industry-drafted letters sent from his office, as well as several private meetings Pruitt has had with the fossil fuel industry — including meetings in West Virginia with coal company Murray Energy.

“I’m asking you if you think it might place you in a conflict of interest,” Whitehouse pressed, “because I think we both understand that the ethics rules the EPA is enforcing pre-date Citizens United, pre-date dark money. And they’ve said that they aren’t even looking at that because they don’t have the authority.”

Many Republican senators, including West Virginia’s Shelley Moore Capito, were enthusiastic about Pruitt’s nomination expressing  confidence that he will “restore the rule of law at the EPA.”

“The EPA’s regulatory overreach has created significant devastation in West Virginia, but for the past eight years the agency has given no indication that it cares about the economic impact of its policies even though the law requires consideration of economic factors. I was glad to receive a commitment from Attorney General Pruitt that under his leadership the EPA will meet this requirement and that if confirmed as EPA administrator, Attorney General Pruitt will visit West Virginia and hear the real-world concerns of people impacted by the agency’s rulemaking,” Capito said.

Senate Hears Trump Nominees for Commerce and Environment

Two nominees for the new administration who could have a lot of influence in our region will be on Capitol Hill this week.  President-elect Donald Trump’s choices for secretary of commerce and the  Environmental Protection Agency both have confirmation hearings in the Senate.

Ross & Commerce

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation is questioning Wilbur Ross. Ross is a billionaire who made some of his fortune here in the Ohio Valley buying and selling assets of collapsed coal and steel companies. Ross has supported many democrats in the past, but this election cycle he’s been a close advisor to Trump.

Ross says increasing U.S. exports and reducing the trade deficit would be among his top priorities, as well as integrating more technology in the commerce department to increase efficiency.

Ross’s background is largely a financial advisor, specializing in bankruptcy. He bought up many collapsing coal and steel companies, repackaged and sold them for a major profit. His business dealings have gained him respect and some notoriety.

Pruitt & Environmental Protection

The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works is interviewing Scott Pruitt — the attorney general from Oklahoma who’s been nominated to take over the Environmental Protection Agency. Pruitt has spent a lot of his time as attorney general fighting against many federal environmental regulations — including the current EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which is the first federal policy of its kind designed to slow greenhouse gas emissions. Pruitt says the extent of climate change and its connection to human activity is a debate that’s “far from settled.”

Exit mobile version