LIVE BLOG: W.Va. 2022 Primary Election

The Associated Press has called the 1st Congressional District race in West Virginia for Rep. Carol Miller and the newly created 2nd Congressional District race for Rep. Alex Mooney, defeating fellow Republican Rep. David McKinley. Both men were incumbents.

Updated on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 9:20 p.m.

There are a number of important races to watch in West Virginia this midterm Primary Election.

The Associated Press has called the 1st Congressional District race in West Virginia for Rep. Carol Miller. The West Virginia Secretary of State’s office reports she has more than 65 percent of the vote.

The AP has also called the newly created 2nd Congressional District race for Rep. Alex Mooney, defeating fellow Republican Rep. David McKinley. Both men were incumbents. The Secretary of State’s office, as of 9:15 p.m., reports Mooney has 54 percent of the vote, while McKinley has 35 percent.

A 2018 law created single member districts in the House of Delegates, and redistricting, spurred by population loss in the 2020 census, has shaken up a number of seats in the West Virginia Legislature and in Congress.

Mooney had been endorsed by former President Donald Trump. McKinley had been endorsed by Gov. Jim Justice and U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin.

All 100 seats in the House are up for grabs, and in several cases, incumbents are running against incumbents.

In the 8th Senatorial District, a Republican candidate was disqualified from the ballot last week in a move that may have caused some confusion at the polls.

Follow along on the West Virginia Secretary of State’s website to see thelatest numbers.

Big Picture

A bright, sunny day at all 1,680 precincts across the state is helping with voter turnout, according to Secretary of State Deputy Chief of Staff Mike Queen.

He said they are facing challenges in two areas:

One is poll workers not showing up and some calling in sick at the last minute, but he said that’s why county clerks have alternates at the ready.

The other challenge comes with redistricting around the state.

Queen said voters who go to their old precinct are being directed to their new precinct, some are even getting rides to their new polling place. Voters who aren’t at their designated precinct can cast a provisional ballot that will be counted at canvass time.

Queen said voter turnout is heavier than expected in the Northern and Eastern Panhandles. Both regions are in the new 2nd Congressional District.

Reporting by Government Reporter Randy Yohe

Charleston Area

Health Reporter June Leffler spoke with several voters on Charleston’s West Side Tuesday. Many said early voting wasn’t much of an option for them and finding their new polling place was challenging.

The precinct at West Side Middle School confused some voters, as polls were usually in the gym. This year, due to some construction, a lack of signage, parking and accessible walkways, voters said they had trouble figuring out where to cast their ballot.

“We had to ride around for a while to figure out exactly where to go,” Olubunmi Kusimo-Fraizer said. “And I told [my husband] straight up I feel disenfranchised.”

Read June’s full story here.

Reporter Curtis Tate also reports from Charleston. Tate spoke with voter Kevin Edwards, a rural mail carrier from Charleston, who cast his ballot in today’s primary at Terrace Park East, an apartment complex near the Capitol.

“We vote in my house,” Edwards said. “We’re voters.”

Edwards said he wasn’t motivated to vote by any particular issues or candidates in the primary. Rather, it was more about civic participation.

“Whatever little teeny piece of hand you have in picking your government, you do have a say.” Edwards, who’s Black, knows that people died for his right to vote.

“My dad and my parents instilled that in me,” Edwards said. “So it’s kind of something I try to pass on to my kids. I want them to understand that it’s not just a right, but it’s kind of a privilege as well.”

For some voters, casting a ballot in Tuesday’s primary was as easy as walking down the street.

“I kind of knew that I might as well wait until Election Day and walk over here and vote, and it was easy as it always is,” DL Hamilton of Charleston said.

Hamilton said there was no line at her polling place near the state capitol, and she was pleased to see some of her neighbors there.

“Voting is so easy in West Virginia when you live close to your polls that I just don’t understand why people don’t vote,” Hamilton said. “And even if they don’t think the process works, it truly is the least we can do.”

Only 26 percent of registered voters cast a ballot in West Virginia’s 2018 primary, according to the West Virginia Secretary of State.

Reporting by Energy & Environment Reporter Curtis Tate

Eastern Panhandle

Conservative voters in the Eastern Panhandle are mixed on whether to vote for incumbent House members David McKinley or Alex Mooney.

Jefferson County voter Jeffery Kellogg said he’s leaning toward McKinley, though he knows most of their voting records are identical.

“I’m a little bit more persuaded to vote for McKinley because he’s a lifelong West Virginian. And Mooney is something of an opportunist who’s been in New Hampshire, then Maryland, and now West Virginia” Kellogg said. “Also, I’m a little bothered by Mooney’s ethics violations, paying for family vacations and Chick-fil-A trips with campaign funds.”

As for the state Senate, some Berkeley and Jefferson county voters are backing District 16’s Renée Wibly over former House of Delegates member Jason Barrett. Voters like Kellogg say that Barrett, a former Democrat, does not seem conservative enough.

“Jason has kind of been Democrat followed by Republican, that bothers me a little bit,” Kellogg said. “And so I’m kind of leaning toward Wibly, even though she doesn’t really have a lot of experience in the legislature the way Jason does.”

Snyder also caught up with some Democrat voters in the Eastern Panhandle.

In the Eastern Panhandle, Democrats are showing up to support causes they feel are threatened by conservatives both in-state and nationwide.

Voters like Nicholas Tucker say they are voting Democrat to defend issues like the potential overturn of Roe v. Wade. He said the precedent could lead to overturning other 14th Amendment rights at the state level like same-sex marriage.

“If you chip away at one section of it, there’s a chink in the armor that can be exploited for any of the future ones,” Tucker said. “So you have to make your voice heard now.”

The West Virginia Legislature has indicated a desire to ban abortion in the state and many voters are concerned it will happen if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

The recent realignment of the state’s House of Delegates districts is also a concern for Tucker. The Republican-led House passed a bill establishing 100 single-member districts in the state earlier this year, with some Democrats arguing the new map gerrymanders the state.

“I would like to see more governments follow a program for completely nonpartisan, unbiased redistricting that associates populations based on their density and relative geographic area and not based on voter base,” Tucker said. “If you win, you win.”

The new House of Delegates district map is set to go into effect in 2023.

Reporting by Eastern Panhandle Reporter Shepherd Snyder

Southern West Virginia

School board elections are taking center stage across the state. Teachers are just one group who turned out to vote in Mercer County. Lauren Rocchetti lives and votes in Mercer County. Like many educators, Rocchetti teaches in a neighboring county. As a teacher, Rocchetti wanted to have a say in the county Board of Education election.

“What brought me out to vote is the board [of education] members,” Rocchetti said. “To help make Mercer County Schools a better place and have a say in what goes on in the election and our area.”

West Virginians are exercising their civic duty by voting in primary elections across the state.

“I just always vote. That’s it. I just vote,” said retired school teacher Mary Hopkins. “I believe it’s my duty as a citizen of the country.”

As an educator for 38 years in Mercer County, Hopkins has seen a power shift with new members elected to the school board but didn’t notice a lot of change throughout the years. As the county board of education elections are determined across the state, Hopkins said the real impact comes from the teachers.

“To me, the impetus for new programs come from the teachers themselves,” Hopkins said. “And from their supervisors. And then, of course, the Board of Education has to think about it, study the programs that are being presented and decide whether or not they think that’s a good way to go forward.”

Deborah Baxter is also a retired school teacher who practiced her civic duty to vote in the primary election.

“Well, I was very curious to see who was going to be on the ballot,” Baxter said after she left her polling place. “I’m a Republican, and there’s not a lot of people on the ballot. So I just wanted to make sure I got my vote.”

Reporting by Southern Coalfields Reporter Jessica Lilly

Huntington Area

Reporter David Adkins spoke with the Wayne County Clerk Renick Booth Tuesday on how redistricting has affected rural West Virginians. Although he voted early, Booth was present 100 feet outside the Wayne Recreation Center, mingling with tailgating constituents across the street.

Booth said redistricting was a messy process. Wayne County was able to organize its precincts last month, but redistricting has created some confusion amongst local residents.

“Some voters who aren’t satisfied; they’ve got new precincts to go to and I can’t blame them,” Booth said. “They voted on that other precincts for many, many years and then all of a sudden it had to change.”

Booth said that what matters most to him this election cycle is keeping a fair election, and he believes that’s exactly what West Virginia is doing.

Adkins also spoke with Huntington voter Angel Plant, 68, on Tuesday. Plant, who is a great-grandmother, said that political engagement is important because it doesn’t just affect her, but will affect generations down the line.

“Write your representatives. Some of them will say, ‘Well they don’t need to get back to you, they don’t care,’ I say, ‘Yes they do.’ I’ve been doing this since way back in the 70s,” Plant said. “Sometimes they are addressing my actual concerns so I know that somebody’s listening … whether they do anything about it or not.”

Plant works with NAACP youth, and said she also encourages them to pay attention to policies that shape their community.

“A lot of the kids that we’re working with are becoming of age now to be able to vote,” Plant said. “You have to teach the basics, and why and everything that’s going on now. Is it going to affect them later on.”

Reporting by Huntington Reporter David Adkins

Morgantown Area

Monongalia County was home to one of West Virginia’s largest multi-member districts, sending five delegates to the West Virginia Legislature. Now, that same area is covered by six distinct, single-member districts.

For Arnettsville voter Debi Beard, that works out just fine.

“I think the western end of the county has always been underrepresented,” Beard said. “So, you know, any representation we can get is a good thing.”

On the other hand, Jordan Rinehart believes candidates like Democrat Evan Hansen could be even more influential under the new system.

“I actually am hoping he can get a little bit more done,” Rinehart said. “That he’s a little bit bigger noise in his group of people than we would have seen previously.”

Primary voting in West Virginia is done on party lines, which can sometimes leave voters spectating on major decisions across the aisle.

Even with their own nominee to pick for the newly drawn 2nd Congressional District, some registered Democrats like Kent Parker in Morgantown were more interested in the Republican primary race.

“I should have switched ballots because the Republicans have an interesting race with those two congressmen,” Parker said. “But of course I didn’t, because I’m a good Democrat.”

In a field of five primary candidates, Republicans had two sitting House members to choose from Tuesday: David McKinley and Alex Mooney.

Some voters like Democrat Joe Evans seemed to believe they may have already missed out on choosing their next Congressman.

“I would have been for McKinley,” Evans said. “But I’m registered Democrat so I couldn’t vote for him. And it sounds like Mooney is going to get that nomination. So I guess I would have rather had McKinley in there.”

Reporting by North Central West Virginia Reporter Chris Schulz

——

Polls in West Virginia close at 7:30 p.m.

Follow along with us on Twitter: @wvpublicnews

2022 Midterms: What To Watch In Nebraska And W.Va.

In West Virginia, two incumbent congressmen are facing off in a Republican primary after redistricting cost the state a seat in the U.S. House.

The top race in Tuesday’s primary elections in Nebraska and West Virginia is a heavily contested Republican primary for Nebraska governor, featuring a Donald Trump-endorsed candidate who has been accused of groping multiple women.

Voters in Nebraska will also be nominating candidates to replace former U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, a Republican convicted in March on charges he lied to federal authorities about an illegal campaign contribution he received from a Nigerian billionaire.

In West Virginia, two incumbent congressmen are facing off in a Republican primary after redistricting cost the state a seat in the U.S. House.

What to watch as Tuesday’s primaries unfold:

How Much Sway Does Trump Have In Nebraska?

In Nebraska’s Republican primary for governor, Trump has endorsed Charles Herbster, a wealthy agribusinessman and cattle breeder who has positioned himself as a political outsider.

Herbster has recently faced allegations that he groped young women, including a Nebraska state senator and a former legislative staffer. He vehemently denies the accusations and has filed a defamation lawsuit against the lawmaker, state Sen. Julie Slama. She filed a countersuit, accusing Herbster of sexual battery. Despite the allegations, Trump has stood by Herbster and appeared with him at a rally last week.

His main rival is University of Nebraska regent Jim Pillen, a former college football player and veterinarian who owns a hog farm operation and swine breeding-stock company. Pillen has won support from high-profile conservatives, including Gov. Pete Ricketts, former Gov. Kay Orr, the influential Nebraska Farm Bureau and former Nebraska football coach Tom Osborne.

And in a surprising twist, state Sen. Brett Lindstrom of Omaha has risen to top-tier status as well with support from Omaha’s Republican mayor and ads in which he pitches himself as a “new generation” of leader. He is considered the more moderate option to Herbster and Pillen.

The winner of the GOP primary is expected to face state Sen. Carol Blood, who is all but certain to win the Democratic nomination for governor over a little-known candidate who hasn’t actively campaigned.

How Did A Congressman’s Conviction Reshape The Primary?

U.S. House primary races are usually low-key affairs in Nebraska, with little turnover among the Republican incumbents. But the state has an open seat this year following Fortenberry’s resignation.

Fortenberry initially planned to seek reelection to a 10th term despite a federal indictment and launched attack ads against his main challenger, Republican state Sen. Mike Flood. He dropped his bid after his conviction, and Flood gained momentum with endorsements from Ricketts and former Gov. Dave Heineman.

Flood is now the strong favorite to win the nomination for the 1st Congressional District out of a field of five Republican candidates. Fortenberry’s name will still appear on the ballot because he withdrew after the state’s deadline to certify candidates.

The GOP nominee is expected to face Democratic state Sen. Patty Pansing Brooks in November. Pansing Brooks is running against University of Nebraska-Lincoln student Jazari Kual Zakaria in the Democratic primary.

Flood and Pansing Brooks will also face each other in a June 28 special election to decide who serves the rest of Fortenberry’s term. The November general election will determine who fills the seat starting in January 2023.

The 1st Congressional District encompasses a stretch of eastern Nebraska, excluding Omaha and most of its suburbs. The Republican-leaning district includes Lincoln as well as large stretches of farmland and small towns.

How Much Do Infrastructure Improvements Matter to West Virginia Voters?

A Republican primary in West Virginia’s 2nd Congressional District between two incumbents could hang on support for President Joe Biden’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure law in the GOP-leaning state.

One of the incumbents, Rep. David McKinley, was among 13 House Republicans to vote for the bill. He cited the state’s “D” infrastructure grade from the American Society of Civil Engineers, saying it would have been a betrayal to vote based on “party politics” on an issue so important to residents.

West Virginia, one of the nation’s poorest states, is slated to get $6 billion in infrastructure money.

The other incumbent, Rep. Alex Mooney, voted against the infrastructure bill and won Trump’s endorsement the day Biden signed the measure into law. Mooney and Trump have called McKinley and other Republicans who voted for the infrastructure bill RINOs, or “Republicans In Name Only.” Mooney called the bill “Biden and Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s spending masterplan” and said it will contribute to inflation.

While in Congress, McKinley and Mooney voted together the vast majority of the time. But the infrastructure vote will serve as a test of Trump’s clout in a state that wholeheartedly embraced him in two presidential elections.

___

Associated Press writer Leah Willingham in Charleston, West Virginia, contributed to this report.

___

Follow Grant Schulte on Twitter: https://twitter.com/GrantSchulte

___

Follow AP for full coverage of the midterms at https://apnews.com/hub/2022-midterm-elections and on Twitter, https://twitter.com/ap_politics

House, Senate Make Progress As Redistricting Efforts Continue in Special Session

Lawmakers working in special session this week in Charleston made progress Wednesday on federal and state redistricting efforts.

The House of Delegates passed the third reading of H.B. 301, which divides the state of West Virginia into 100 single-member delegate districts. The final vote was 79 to 20 with one absent.

Democrats offered several amendments to the map proposed by the Republican-dominated redistricting committee, but each of the amendments were rejected along mostly party lines.

The House bill now goes to the Senate where it is expected to pass overwhelmingly.

The Senate passed a bill on third reading to accept a north-south configuration for new Congressional districts. The redraw, which divided the state from three into two Congressional districts, is due to population losses calculated in the most recent Census.

Courtesy of the W.Va. Senate
/
A new map has passed third reading in the W.Va. Senate that would divide the state into a north-south configuration for two seats on the U.S. House of Representatives. It keeps population in each district nearly equal.

Senate lawmakers voted 30-2 with two absent to accept what has been referred to as the Trump 8 map. This map is similar to a previously considered map, Trump 11, but shifts two counties. Ritchie County now moves into District 1 in the north, and Pendleton moves into District 2, which encompasses the southern half of the state.

Charles Trump, a Republican from Morgan County and the Senate Redistricting Committee chairman, said he’s confident this version passes state and federal constitutional muster.

“I think it reflects best in the way that the citizens of West Virginia, perhaps live, think, act,” Trump said from the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon.

On population, he added: “It’s very very close… The truth is this. In West Virginia you can’t get the absolute numerical equality unless you are willing to divide a county. Having these two districts be as close as they are in terms of population… I believe will satisfy any constitutional challenge that will come.”

Lawmakers Move Proposed Redrawn Maps Through Legislative Process

West Virginia lawmakers endorsed proposed maps of congressional and state legislative districts during the second day of a special session on redistricting. That sets up a potential fight between two of the state’s current members of Congress.

In the proposed map, Rep. David McKinley and Rep. Alex Mooney would be in the same district. All three current U.S. House members from West Virginia are Republicans.

Maps redrawing Senate and House districts have also advanced to the third reading which should take place on Wednesday in their respective houses. No amendments have been offered on either map so far, but they are expected on the third reading.

House of Delegates single-member districts were mandated in a 2018 bill that passed the Legislature. Currently, there are 67 districts and more than half of the House is elected from multiple-member districts.

What To Know As Lawmakers Redraw W.Va. Political Maps

This story was originally published by Mountain State Spotlight. Get stories like this delivered to your email inbox once a week; sign up for the free newsletter at https://mountainstatespotlight.org/newsletter

For months, West Virginia lawmakers have met both publicly and privately to determine how the state will be divided into new political districts that will affect state and federal elections for the next decade.

The process, known as redistricting, occurs every 10 years, after the U.S. Census. As populations in the state and country shift, so must the political boundaries: This ensures that constituents in any given area have roughly the same voting power as constituents in another.

Starting Monday, the Legislature will convene a special session to finalize maps proposed by redistricting committees in the House of Delegates and state Senate. The House committee, chaired by Delegate Gary Howell, R-Mineral, has already proposed a single map for delegate districts. The Senate committee, chaired by Sen. Charles Trump, R-Morgan, has proposed multiple maps, but has yet to choose one that will advance to the full Legislature for a vote.

Both committees have proposed many different options for re-drawing the state’s congressional districts, which will shrink from three to two in the next election.

With multiple major changes set to take place, this year’s process will be one of the most consequential for West Virginia in decades.

The process will also be led by a Republican Party that has a supermajority in both the House of Delegates and the Senate, as well as control of the Governor’s Mansion — the first time the party has controlled all three since the Great Depression-era.

What’s at stake for West Virginians?

How political boundaries are drawn can have massive impacts on how elections play out, and which communities are able to send representatives to the Statehouse, even when you don’t account for how the people within those boundaries vote.

And because of a 2018 law that requires the current 67 House of Delegates districts be divided into 100, there are lots of new lines for lawmakers to draw.

One example of a place where this rearranging could have real consequences is Martinsburg. The current proposed delegate district map divides the city among four delegate districts, with each of those districts fanning out into surrounding, more rural areas.

With a population of 18,777 as of the most recent census, an entire delegate district could theoretically fit within the boundaries of the city, guaranteeing residents a lamaker that would represent the city alone in every election. But drawing the lines to split up Martinsburg and include outlying areas means that voters will have to share delegates with residents from surrounding areas, whose needs, priorities and political leanings may diverge.

Will the process be fair?

West Virginia is one of 10 states in the country where lawmakers control the redistricting process, as opposed to an independent commission, or some combination of lawmakers and independent citizens. While a legislative-run process does not mean there will be gerrymandering — the manipulation of political boundaries with the intent to influence future elections — it suggests an inherent conflict of interest. The lines drawn by lawmakers will have an impact on their party’s future, as well their personal political careers.

Sometimes gerrymandering appears in a partisan way, like when a majority party is trying to cement its control of a legislature. Sometimes it’s to dilute the influence of racial groups, or communities bound by a shared language or history.

Bills to move the state to a redistricting process run by an independent, bipartisan or nonpartisan commission have been introduced many times over the decades by West Virginia lawmakers. While such moves have frequently been supported by members of the minority party, Democrats and Republicans alike, the majority party has always shot them down.

And while fair elections advocates across the political spectrum have advocated for moving to single-member delegate districts, like West Virginia is doing this year, some fear that adding more boundaries can lead to more gerrymandering, especially when lawmakers are drawing those lines..

In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal courts could not strike down political maps over partisan gerrymandering, no matter how blatant.

This year, leaders of the West Virginia House and Senate redistricting committees promised transparency. Lawmakers held public hearings across the state to collect input from citizens about how their communities should be divided. However, there is no requirement that lawmakers take this input into account.

Lawmakers have also repeatedly solicited citizen input on the proposed maps that are set to be voted on by the full Legislature. But with only days to go until lawmakers are set to vote on those, the Senate redistricting committee has still yet to decide on a final Senate district map to set forward. The House committee released their sole proposed map on Sept. 30, less than two weeks before the recently-announced special session.

Democrats in the House of Delegates have already raised concerns that they’re being treated unfairly, with little time to push back against proposed maps. Nearly half of their caucus in the chamber has been drawn into a district with another incumbent, which means someone will definitely lose a seat unless they move to a new district. In four districts, Democrats have been pitted against fellow Democrats, and in two districts, Democrat delegates were drawn in with a Republican.

Howell, for his part, has said that he did not look at lawmakers’ addresses when drawing the maps.

What are the rules?

All electoral districts, federal and local, must be roughly equal in population across the state, a concept known as “one person, one vote.” If one district had a significantly higher population than another, citizens in the more populous district would have their individual votes diluted.

Generally, congressional districts should have a population deviance of no more than 1%. Similarly, courts have largely held that delegate and state senatorial districts that deviate by no more than 10% between the most and least populous districts can stand.

In West Virginia, lawmakers are also required to keep counties together as much as possible by not crossing county lines when drafting districts. And the state constitution holds that districts must be compact and contiguous.

When it comes to both differences in population and deviations from county lines, lawmakers must be ready to defend their decisions in court. Keeping a community, or specific city, together, for example, could be a justification for allowing one district to have a larger population than another. But a lawsuit could be successful if deviations are found to be arbitrary.

The 1965 Voting Rights Act also prohibits lawmakers from gerrymandering communities along racial lines — or from dividing up minority communities to dilute their power of their vote.

Why is this all happening so fast?

Because of delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic, delivery of the results of the 2020 census were delayed from April to August.

The changing delegate district map could also create electoral complications if it’s finalized after November, especially for incumbents. State law requires that candidates live in a district for one year prior to an election. As it stands, because the number of districts is increasing, 33 of the districts don’t exist yet. And a lawmaker drawn into a district with a fellow incumbent may want to move into a district without an incumbent to run again with less established opposition.

What happens next?

Both the House and Senate redistricting committees still need to vote to advance their proposed maps to the whole statehouse. Once there, lawmakers will vote to advance them to the Governor’s desk as is, or make amendments, by majority vote. To initiate this process, Gov. Jim Justice called the legislature into a special session that will start Monday, Oct. 11.

After the maps have advanced through the chambers, Justice can sign the new maps into law, or veto them. Though a veto can be overridden with a simple majority vote, it’s a powerful symbolic gesture. In 2011, for example, then-Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin vetoed the first redistricting plan sent to his desk, and a second special session was called where lawmakers amended the maps to address some of his critiques.

Still, even after attaining the governor’s sign-off, the maps may face a final challenge: lawsuits. Historically speaking, a lawsuit over any new map is likely and officials are expecting them. Last week at a town hall meeting in Fairmont, Attorney General Patrick Morrisey noted that he was already preparing to allocate resources to defending whatever map the Legislature ends up passing.

Public Hearings Set On West Virginia Redistricting Process

Public hearings have been set on West Virginia’s redistricting process.

The Legislature’s joint redistricting committee will hold 12 in-person hearings and three virtual hearings.

The first hearing is July 27 at the Putnam County Judicial Building in Winfield. Other hearings are set for July 29 at Chief Logan State Park in Logan, Aug. 3 at Tamarack in Beckley, Aug. 4 at the Summersville Arena and Conference Center and Aug. 10 at Stonewall Resort in Roanoke.

Lawmakers will decide on legislative district boundaries as well as how to split the state into two congressional districts, down from the current three. West Virginia’s long population slide cost the state its third congressional seat, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released in April.

A special session is expected to convene later in the year on the redistricting process.

Exit mobile version