Religious, But Not Philosophical, Exemptions Added Back Into The Vaccine Bill

Lawmakers considered multiple changes to the vaccine bill on Friday, one that profoundly changed the legislation.

Friday the vaccine bill was in a stage where it could again be amended and changed, and after many amendments the bill was changed to allow religious exemptions. 

The first proposed amendment profoundly changed the bill. It was named after the health committee that it was created in. That ‘primary’ amendment did away with the religious and philosophical exemptions. The only exception possible was a medical one, which is similar to current law. 

The second ‘primary’ amendment would have changed the bill nearly back to the senate version of the bill which had no reporting requirements, required private schools to accept a religious exemption, and allowed for civil lawsuits against schools that could result in monetary relief.

After nearly half a dozen proposed amendments one stuck. 

But first the House made changes to the first amendment, the one from the house health committee.

After nearly half a dozen proposed amendments, and hours of debate, one key secondary amendment stuck. 

Del. David Green, R-McDowell, successfully put forth an amendment that would have put religious exemptions back in. However it upheld current provisions in the primary amendment that would allow private schools to set their own vaccine requirements, something different from the original vaccine bill that came out of the Senate. 

“This country was founded upon religious freedoms,” Green said. “As a young person, teenager, going to school, I wondered often, why our state didn’t allow for religious exemptions, and today we get to change that.” 

Del. Bob Fehrenbacher, R-Wood, pointed to the fact that West Virginia has one of the lowest vaccination rates for children under 3. However, schoolage children and adults in the state have one of the highest vaccination rates, a shift he attributes to public school vaccine requirements.  

He worries that if the state loosens vaccination requirements for school children then overall vaccination rates in the state would plummet. 

Now that, to me, would suggest that number may go down and put more children into the systems without vaccination,” Fehrenbacher.

Del. Fluharty, a D-Ohio, said the religious amendment would be broad, only requiring a note stating the exemption. The amendment also took away reporting requirements for children who receive the religious exemption. 

I could write it on a piece of toilet paper,” Fluharty. “Hey, this goes beyond Johnny’s religious beliefs or my religious beliefs, and therefore hand it over to the principal.” 

Despite the amendment standing to make a key change to the primary amendment passed out by the Health Committee the bill was supported by the Health Committee chair, Worrell. 

In a slim margin for the current Republican supermajority, the bill passed. 52-44. 

After many more failed amendments, the legislature voted on the two primary amendments – Anders’ amendment, which was untouched by amendments, and the House Health Committee’s amendment, which at its core was changed to allow for religious and philosophical changes. 

If one passed it would cancel out the other.  

By the slimmest margins of the day, the health committee primary amendment won out.

Worrell explains where the bill stands now. 

The only [amendment] that was adopted was to Delegate Green’s from the 36 that added a religious exemption into the amendment into the bill, while also keeping private and parochial schools to set their own policy,” Worrell said.  

Sen. Laura Chapman said she was overall happy with where the bill currently stands. 

Now the bill heads back to the Senate, where the changes made will be considered. If the senate concurs with changes made by the House, then the bill heads to the Governor’s desk. 

House Passes Raw Milk Bill, Goes to the Governor

After a veto from Governor Tomblin last year, members of the Senate and the House have both taken up a bill that would allow West Virginians to consume raw milk. Members of the Senate passed the bill earlier this month on a vote of 22 to 12, and yesterday, Delegates cast their final votes.

Senate Bill 387 would allow West Virginians to enter herd-sharing agreements, or shared ownership of milk producing animals. After filing the agreements with the state Department of Agriculture, it would then be legal for all of the owners to drink the raw milk produced by the animal. The herd-sharers would also be required to meet state and federal standards set by the state veterinarian and report any instances of illnesses.

The bill would not allow the owners to sell or distribute the raw milk to anyone else.

Delegate Kelli Sobonya, a Republican from Cabell County stood in favor of the bill.

“There’s many products that remain legal in West Virginia that have presented true dangers,” Sobonya noted, “Tobacco’s still legal, yet we keep talking about how dangerous it is; artificial sweeteners, certain legal drugs are dangerous. Ladies and gentlemen, this bill has been discussed for several years. Let’s get this out of the House, back to the Senate for a House message, let it go to the governor. If you’re against it, vote against it, but if you’re for liberty and food freedom, vote for it.”

Delegate Don Perdue is a Democrat from Wayne County and the former chair of the House Health Committee. He stood against the bill.

“We bring this down to suggest it’s an issue of freedom. It’s freedom we’re talking about here; freedom to do whatever you want. Well folks, that means we need to get rid of all the public health laws; smoking in buildings, we need to get rid of all of those; that’s what’s being said. And the troubling thing about that is; your right to be sick ends where my right to be healthy begins,” Perdue said.

House Health Committee Chair Joe Ellington spoke in support of the bill, citing other foods like raw meats, certain vegetables, and even water that could contain harmful bacteria.

“So you have to put in perspective as far as numbers. Yes there are potential serious infections, yes people can potentially die, but as I mentioned last year, most of the things we’re exposed to everyday can do the same thing,” Ellington explained.

Senate Bill 387 passed 88 to 11 and now goes to the governor for consideration.

In the governor’s veto message last year, Tomblin said the bill could pose serious risk to public health particularly in children, pregnant women, and people with compromised immune systems.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from the Benedum Foundation.

House Begins Discussion Over Abortion Bill

The House of Delegates is just beginning its work on a bill that would ban one of the nation’s most commonly used second-trimester abortion methods.

As approved in the Senate, Senate Bill 10 would ban what are commonly referred to as dismemberment abortions. That ban is only when the abortion is elective, not in cases of medical emergencies. Discussion over the bill began with a public hearing Monday morning.

Senate Bill 10 would ban what are medically known as dilation and evacuation abortions in West Virginia. While physicians say D&E abortions are common across the country, testimony given before the state Senate said those abortions is actually rare in West Virginia. Physicians also testified it is one of the safest abortion options.

But during a public hearing on the bill Monday morning, 5 people spoke in favor of banning the practice, calling the technique gruesome. 

Senate Bill 10 requires doctors performing these types of abortions euthanize the fetus before dismemberment. Delegate Joe Ellington is the House’s Health Committee Chair, and he’s also a practicing OBGYN.

“There’s pros and cons to both sides of it,” Ellington said, “One part is terminating a fetus that’s alive before it is extracted by the procedure that the sponsors are trying to eliminate. It does affect the standard of care that’s currently in place with the medical profession. From an obstetrician’s standpoint, I’m going to have to balance that with what the proponents are willing to try to do.”

Members of the House Health Committee could take up Senate Bill 10 as soon as Tuesday.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from the Benedum Foundation.

Exit mobile version