WVU President Delivers Final State Of University Address

West Virginia University President E. Gordon Gee gave his last state of the university address to the university’s Faculty Assembly Monday.

West Virginia University President E. Gordon Gee gave his last state of the university address to the university’s Faculty Assembly Monday.

“Today, after more than a decade as president, I have come to address the state of West Virginia University for a final time,” Gee said to open.

Gee’s contract ends June 30, 2025 after he spent 11 years in the position. He previously served as WVU’s president in the 1980s.

Gee said the end of his second tenure had him reflecting more about the future of WVU than its past. 

“My purpose has been to make things better for West Virginians and to build a university with the strength and power to succeed long after I am gone,” he said. “This is just the beginning. West Virginia University is built to last. And we will continue to grow and prosper as we create endless possibilities for our students and the citizens of West Virginia.”

Gee focused on improvements at the university during his tenure, including an improved freshman retention rate, as well as national and international awards received by faculty and students.

He also described the recent faculty and programmatic cuts as an improvement.

“Through the difficult but necessary process of Academic Transformation, we have better aligned complementary programs to serve students today and well into the future in new units: the College of Applied Human Sciences, the College of Creative Arts and Media and the Division for Land-Grant Engagement,” Gee said. 

WVU is actively engaged in a national search for Gee’s replacement, and recently held listening sessions across its campuses for community input on the process.

Faculty Question How University Will Avoid Future Cuts

At Monday’s WVU Faculty Senate meeting, Provost Maryanne Reed announced a significant number of faculty — 74 — have voluntarily retired or resigned from the university.

Faculty members at West Virginia University (WVU) have started to learn whether or not their contracts will be renewed. 

In response to a $45 million budgetary shortfall, WVU determined last month that it needed to cut 143 faculty positions, called reduction in faculty (RIF).

However, at Monday’s WVU Faculty Senate meeting, Provost Maryanne Reed announced a significant number of faculty — 74 — have voluntarily retired or resigned from the university.

“If there’s any good news, it is that the number of faculty who will be receiving their RIF notices has been reduced by a little over 50 percent,” she said.

That leaves 69 faculty yet to be dismissed.

“I realized that is of little solace for the family of those faculty members who will be losing their positions,” Reed said. “I recognize this is going to be very difficult on those individuals and their families.”

Much of the meeting was taken up by questions from faculty senators to administrators regarding the process and appeals for a reduction in force.

President Gordon Gee was asked how the university is planning to avoid future cuts.

“I cannot predict the future, although I can predict that this transformation process will allow us to have an opportunity to be more forward leaning,” he said.

Gee said the academic transformation will position the university to be competitive and continue to grow and invest. He also pointed to a new state funding formula that will be helpful “to look into the future in a much more positive way.”

Faculty members did not seem satisfied with Gee’s answers. Daniel Totzkay, senator for the Eberly College of Arts & Sciences, reiterated the question again later in the meeting.

“We’re here because we had a $45 million budget deficit,” he said. “How do we not get there again?”

Gee said that the academic transformation process was accelerated by the university’s financial problems, but began before as a response to a changing landscape in higher education.

“Can I guarantee that we’ll no longer have budgetary problems? Of course not,” Gee said. ”But I can guarantee that we’ll work to grow our budget, that we’ll work to put ourselves in a much more competitive position.”

Rob Alsop, WVU’s vice president for strategic initiatives, gave more detail regarding the implementation of new budgetary practices, including a new budgetary model.

“Additionally, we are seeking to enhance the reporting from a budgetary perspective,” he said. “There will be more reporting publicly about, ‘How do our revenues look coming into the fall? What do our expenses look like over the first couple of months going forward?’ And so, what we have done in the past, that we’re redoubling our efforts moving forward, is to be more aggressive and looking at leading indicators.”

Gee Responds To Questions At Faculty Senate Meeting

West Virginia University faculty and students had a lot of questions for the university president about looming cuts to programs during Monday’s Faculty Senate meeting.

West Virginia University faculty and students had a lot of questions about looming cuts to programs during Monday’s Faculty Senate meeting.

WVU President Gordon Gee delivered a statement addressing what he called misrepresentations of the academic transformation process at the start of the meeting.

“I will not accept the narrative being promulgated that we have mismanaged this university, where we are making it a lesser university,” he said. “That is absolutely far from the truth.”

He dismissed claims that the university’s budgets were designed around the aspiration of growing enrollment, or that the university’s debt load increased by 55 percent. Gee also emphasized that the university has been addressing areas of concern since 2016.

“Almost every program that was put on watch was told three years ago that they were going to be recommended for discontinuance because they were not operating at an optimum level including declining enrollments,” he said. “They had multiple opportunities to bring forth viable options for change.”

After his statement, Gee spent more than a half hour answering questions from faculty members and students, many of whom questioned his assertions.

Asked by one student if he would take a pay cut to help mitigate the budget shortfall, Gee responded that he had not had a pay raise in the 10 years since his return to the university.

“I don’t advertise that I also am a major donor to the university, I have given a substantial amount of money,” Gee said. “During the pandemic, there was a decision made that we would not cut any salaries for the teaching faculty. But we did ask our senior administration and our athletic department – for all of them to cut their salaries. And they did.”

Douglas Terry, an English professor in Beckley, asked how eliminating World Languages would lead to WVU providing a robust liberal arts education.

“We’re in a modern country, we have many modern ways now to teach foreign languages and to teach and to engage in culture,” Gee said. “There is not just one way to salvation, there’s a number of ways of salvation and that’s exactly what we are doing and what we’re going to explore.” 

Gee also used the opportunity to discuss the World Language Department’s performance issues.

“They had a student faculty ratio better than the department of surgery and on top of it, they said, ‘Well, we’re making $800,000.’” he said. “That is false, from the very start, because what they’re doing is they’re counting student hours. That is someone else’s money.”

Mathematics professor Ela Celikbas asked about the impact of the proposal to cut the university’s math PhD, particularly on math education. 

“Mathematics is critical to our sciences, but it doesn’t mean that we need to do it the way that everyone else does it,” Gee said. “The fundamental issue is, math is critical. But not every aspect of mathematics in this state at this university is critical.” 

The remainder of the meeting was focused on the details of the reduction in force and non renewal process if the Board of Governors votes Friday to approve cuts to programs.

On Tuesday afternoon, the Board of Governors released an open letter jointly with Gee reiterating many of the points he made during the Faculty Senate meeting.

WVU Faculty Vote No Confidence In Gee, Freeze Academic Transformation Process

Hundreds of faculty members met to vote on the resolution of no confidence in President Gordon Gee, as well as a resolution to freeze the academic transformation process that has led to proposals to cut dozens of degrees and hundreds of faculty positions from the Morgantown campus.

With a vote of 797 to 100, the faculty of West Virginia University affirmed that they do not have confidence in President Gordon Gee’s leadership.

Hundreds of faculty members met in person in the Clay Theatre of the Creative Arts Center in Morgantown, with hundreds more from the university’s Beckley and Keyser campuses joining online. They met to vote on the resolution of no confidence in Gee, as well as a resolution to freeze the academic transformation process that has led to proposals to cut dozens of degrees and hundreds of faculty positions from the Morgantown campus. University administration plans to conduct similar program reviews and cuts at Beckley and Keyser next year.

The votes are non-binding, but librarian Jonah McAllister-Erickson says that voicing their concerns to the administration is one of the faculty’s only recourses. 

“I think it says something that in a matter of days, we see hundreds, perhaps upwards of over 1000 faculty members in the middle of the day coming together to voice our collective concerns here,” McAllister-Erickson said. “That says that there’s something fundamentally wrong happening at WVU.”

Academic support units like libraries are up for their own review later this year. McAllister-Erickson said unlike academic programs, they do not have the right to appeal.

“We’ve seen several of the initial recommendations for the academic units appealed successfully and make positive changes to the proposals,” he said. “My fear is that  in the end, the academic support units will be used to make up the difference between the amount of money the administration thinks they need to save, and what they have been able to cut from the academic units.”

Later in the meeting, the resolution calling for a freeze to the academic transformation process was also approved on similar margins to the vote of no confidence. The final tally was 747 for and 79 against the resolution. 

Prior to the vote, Provost Maryanne Reed asked to address the assembly on the resolution. Not being a faculty member she needed to be formally recognized by the assembly, but was voted down 302 in favor to 406 opposed. 

Christiaan Abildso, an associate professor in the School of Public Health, was excited by the results but understood that the decision was still in the hands of the Board of Governors. He said he felt proud to see the faculty come together.

“It stinks that it’s against something, but hopefully we keep this feeling of support for one another,” Abildso said. “Showing up every day to work is a traumatic experience right now, it’s brutal. Hopefully people stick together, support one another and get through this with without cutting and harming so many people’s lives as what has been pushed on us.”   

As faculty members streamed out of the building, they were met by chants of “eight to one” from students protesting in support of the votes, a reference to the ratio of votes in favor over against the resolutions.  

Jake Hough is a journalism major. He said although his program is not directly impacted, he and other students think it’s important for everyone to pay attention to what is happening.

“These professors are our family,” Hough said. “I look ahead, and we have to ask what’s next? This isn’t just a foreign language issue. This isn’t just an upper level math issue. This isn’t just a mining engineering issue. This is a campus wide issue.”

In a statement released shortly after the conclusion of the university assembly, Board of Governors Chair Taunja Willis-Miller said the board appreciated the faculty members who shared their perspectives and acknowledged the votes.

“The Board of Governors unequivocally supports the leadership of President Gee and the strategic repositioning of WVU and rejects the multiple examples of misinformation that informed these resolutions,” Willis-Miller said in the statement. “The university is transforming to better reflect the needs of today, and we must continue to act boldly. President Gee has shown time and again he is not afraid to do the difficult work required.”

The statement goes on to say the process is critical to ensure a strong future for the University.

As the faculty meeting was underway, Gov. Jim Justice held an administrative briefing. Asked if he had confidence in Gee, Justice said he did.

“Now we can say a whole lot of things about Gordon Gee, but I am telling you wholeheartedly that man is eat up with trying to do good stuff for West Virginia,” Justice said.

The university Board of Governors will meet twice next week: on Sept. 14 to hear public comment on the proposed program cuts and again Sept. 15 to vote on the proposals.

The Faculty Senate meets Monday.

President Gee Faces Vote Of No Confidence Next Week

The University Assembly will meet Sept. 6 at noon to vote on resolutions of no confidence in West Virginia University President Gordon Gee’s leadership, as well as to halt the academic transformation process.

The University Assembly will meet Sept. 6 at noon to vote on resolutions of no confidence in West Virginia University President Gordon Gee’s leadership, as well as to halt the academic transformation process. The appointment of the university’s president is ultimately up to the Board of Governors.

The resolution purports Gee has mismanaged the university’s finances and failed to provide honest and transparent communication within the university community.

During Monday’s WVU Faculty Senate meeting, Chair Frankie Tack said the resolutions had received the minimum five percent of verified faculty signatures to call an assembly meeting.

The assembly is open to all faculty members across WVU’s three campuses with faculty from Kaiser and Potomac joining remotely. The primary meeting will take place in person at the Center for Creative Arts in Morgantown.  

Tack estimated around 700 faculty members will need to attend to form a quorum.  

“We are requesting that unit leaders support faculty who have scheduled face-to-face or synchronous online classes during that time in providing out-of-class assignments to their students and canceling class so they can attend the assembly,” she said.

Faculty senators questioned why the meeting was not being held in a hybrid format to allow the largest amount of faculty to participate. 

“First, the WVU Zoom is limited to 1,000 participants,” Tack said. She went on to say that the use of the chat and Q&A functions in previous online meetings have not allowed the meetings to remain in order.

“We are bound by our faculty constitution to follow Robert’s Rules of Order, and we cannot do that with that many people online,” Tack said. “We saw this most recently with our last Faculty Senate meeting, where faculty senators were repeatedly asked to stop posting in the chat and the Q&A, and to raise their hand to be recognized. We have a process, and again it’s bound by our constitution. Dropping into the Q&A, and in the chat online is akin to hollering out from your seat in this forum.”

Gee faced a similar vote of no confidence in December 2021, that time alongside Provost Maryanne Reed. Gee addressed the Faculty Senate Monday. That vote was not successful.

“I want to be clear that West Virginia University is not dismantling higher education — but we are disrupting it and I am a firm believer in disruption,” he said. “I have seen numerous stories and posts about how we are ‘gutting’ or ‘eviscerating’ our university. That is simply not true.”

Gee acknowledged that it was a difficult time for the university community, but that change was necessary.

“I’ve had a lot of anger directed at me over time,” he said. “I’m not immune to it, but I certainly understand it so I accept the criticism as it comes with the job.”

An online student petition supporting the resolutions started on Monday has already garnered more than 160 signatures.

WVU Faculty Senate Chair Discusses University’s Transformation Process

On Friday, West Virginia University announced the initial recommendations for cuts to academic programs to address an estimated $45 million budget shortfall for fiscal year 2024. The recommended cuts – which include the complete dissolution of the World Languages Department – are part of a larger transformational process the university has been undergoing for several years. Before the proposed cuts were announced, reporter Chris Schulz sat down with Associate Professor and Chair of the WVU Faculty Senate Frankie Tack to discuss the academic restructuring process.

On Friday, West Virginia University (WVU) announced the initial recommendations for cuts to academic programs to address an estimated $45 million budget shortfall for fiscal year 2024. The recommended cuts – which include the complete dissolution of the World Languages Department – are part of a larger transformational process the university has been undergoing for several years.

Before the proposed cuts were announced, reporter Chris Schulz sat down with Associate Professor and Chair of the WVU Faculty Senate Frankie Tack to discuss the academic restructuring process.

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

Schulz: Could you give me kind of the “back of the napkin” of what the Faculty Senate does?

Tack: The Faculty Senate represents faculty in the shared governance at the university. Shared governance is a process in higher education whereby faculty have the opportunity to provide a voice on the academic side of the house, a big focus on curriculum, faculty welfare, policies and procedures related to things like promotion and tenure and evaluation, student evaluations of instruction. We have a big initiative on that and other forms of evaluation. 

We’re a representative body to be the voice of faculty, for the entire faculty body with upper administration. Somebody said to me, “You actually act more like a House than a Senate.” But we elect members from each college based on the number of faculty meeting certain requirements in that college. So not every college has the same number of faculty senators, but it’s equitable, based on the size of the college, and they are elected based on their colleges and not their programs or their schools or departments.

Schulz: I’ve been aware that things are changing at WVU but obviously the process has been, in the university’s own words, accelerated recently. So what can you tell me from your perspective about the WVU Transformation project?

Tack: The process started a few years ago, and it was initially a process that had a longer time focus on it, really primarily focused at what’s called the demographic cliff. We know there’s a big change in demographics across the United States in the college-going age, traditional age population. So it was initially focused on preparing for that. So looking at ways to tighten things up, become more focused on what students are looking for in higher ed, etc. It was more of an incremental process. But, things have become acute now, and COVID accelerated a lot of that and a variety of, you know, sort of perfect storm type events coming together to the point that now we have to act and we have to act in the short term. 

Generally speaking, it was more incremental and sort of, I would say, a softer process. But this phase is faster, deeper, broader, more visible, and ultimately is going to be more impacting. We just no longer have time on our side.

Schulz: It really seems like this acceleration has focused pretty heavily on the academic aspects of the university. Do you have any concept of why that perception is so strong? And is that something that you’ve discussed with other faculty members?

Tack:  With other faculty members, just to start there, and in depth ongoing on almost a daily basis with upper administration. So I think it did, to some degree, it did start there. Faculty salaries are a huge driver of the overall WVU budget, and so to make an impact of the size that has to be made financially, that had to be a big part of the process. And so then to do that, we have to look at what those faculty do. That is driven primarily from a revenue standpoint, a tuition standpoint, by programs, by the degrees, by the majors that we offer our students. So if you’re going to reduce faculty, you have to do that in some cogent way, or else you’re really going to damage the institution. This process is about really taking a hard look at all of our programs and seeing where we may be able to reduce in a way that has a minimal impact on students, but also maybe re-configures what we do to be more focused on what’s needed today and today’s 2023 environment versus, say, the 1993 environment. 

Now, having said that, President Gee has repeatedly said we’re all in this together. This isn’t any one person’s problem. He has said it’s not his problem, it’s our problem and that no area of the university is sacred. So we have been pushing, having heard that, for a deeper view on all areas of the university. We are getting that, area by area, we have one or two more to go. But I tell you, we have pushed for a review of the academic service units within the provost’s office, and there’s about a dozen of these. We have pushed for the provost’s office to review their structure itself, which is the structure of leadership and associate provost and whatnot, the infrastructure in the provost’s office. We most recently have talked to President Gee about looking at his staff, the president’s office. We have been pushing for what’s called the non-academic units, though we do recognize everything supports academics in one way or another, but all of the units under Rob Alsop, which are all the support units, things like environmental services and shared services, contract management, all that. Take a lot, a real hard look at those to make sure that they are right sized to look for opportunities for additional cuts in Rob’s area. 

They’ve recently merged, we had two different IT services, one that served our health sciences and all of our medical related programs, and then another for the rest of university. They’ve recently merged those and reduced seven positions. Those areas have also been taking cuts over those past few years, as they were trying not to touch the academic side, and do those incremental changes. 

So it started on that side and frankly, that’s our biggest opportunity for cuts. It’s just the nature of a university. But we are pushing very hard that everything should be right sized. This is the moment for us to analyze everything.

Schulz: Just like with any other organization, personnel costs are going to be a big chunk of that pay. I know that intellectually, this makes sense, intellectually, it’s necessary. Emotionally, how are you feeling about this process?

Tack: Well, you know, it’s awful. Anytime you talk about people losing jobs, and people have already lost jobs, people that were on annual contracts, and did not have those contracts renewed as of June 30, July 1, and more people are going to lose jobs. And that’s awful. These are our colleagues, they’re friends, and we live in a small college town. They’re also our neighbors. I live on a street that’s WVU from one end to the other. It’s heart wrenching. I think that’s just the worst part of it all. 

The piece that kind of goes with that, that is kind of secondary to the people, our colleagues and their families is our programs. Nobody, I don’t think works in higher ed as a professor in a discipline they don’t care about, have passion about, are invested in. And for many of us we’ve participated in building our programs, not just teaching them and researching them, but actually creating them. That’s its own heartbreak, to see something you’ve invested yourself in be greatly reduced or eliminated.

I think that, that’s another heartbreak. We’re going to have to go through a process. We’ve been saying this to the administration, that once we get past all this stuff that’s going to happen in the fall, and probably through the teach-outs of any programs that are discontinued, we’re going to be in a grieving process. There’s going to be a lot of loss, and we’re going to have to go through that process. And we’re probably going to lose additional people who self-select out because they don’t want to participate in that or they don’t want to participate in the new WVU, if you will. 

But I’ve kind of likened it to a forest fire Chris, in that you have this raging forest fire, and it goes through and everything is just kind of burnt to a crisp, and there may be a thing or two left standing. They’re not gonna burn everything by any means. Then it lays dormant for a little while, but then it starts to grow and bloom and the fire and its remnants end up feeding the growth. And that’s my hope. I personally think that’s going to be more in the four or five year time frame rather than the maybe two year time frame that some of our leaders are talking about. But maybe they’re better at hope than I am.

Schulz: That’s certainly very vivid in the way that you put it. You mentioned that there’s going to be a new WVU, something is going to emerge from this process. And it’s going to look very similar to what was here before, but it will be different. So I do wonder what you’ve been hearing from the other senators, from your constituency, about what’s going to come out on the other side? 

Tack: I think that’s part of why we’ve been pushing and pushing for so much transparency from upper administration, because there’s a lot of theories about how we got here, and then how we’re gonna move forward, based on those theories of how we got here. We have been pushing for documentation on all the things people have been asking about, from our public-private partnerships to our debt structure, our past budgets, our organizational structures, a ton of things.

There’s a feeling about wanting to hold somebody accountable, that’s part of it. I believe the other part is, how can I have trust in the future if I’m one of the ones left standing? How can I believe that we’re well to move forward, we’re strong financially, we’re strong with our leadership, etc.? I think part of how we’re going about that is to get as much information in the hands of faculty as we can. We’ve never had to know about all these intricacies of the university. Now I believe we have a right to know, if you’re going to cut faculty jobs, especially people who are tenure track and tenured. That’s certainly unprecedented at WVU, and it’s practically unprecedented nationwide. So I think we have a right to know how the rest of the place is being operated if we’re going to lose our jobs to fill the gap.

You asked something else about that. Other concerns that we’re hearing? The future certainly is a big concern. I think there are also concerns about pressures on workload, faculty needing to teach more than they have in the past. I think we have, faculty have, concerns about how that’s going to impact their research agendas and their ability to continue to research at the robust level that they have. I think there’s concerns about that for people pursuing tenure. And just our overall mission relative to the university’s research. We’re an R1 university for research at the highest level, it is the upper administration’s goal to remain an R1. We all want to remain an R1. I think right now, it feels a little fuzzy to faculty about how we’re going to do that, relative to the pressures on other parts of the workload. I think we’ll get there, I don’t think our R1 is at risk. And again, we’ve pushed into this a lot, but I do think there’s a reckoning there perhaps yet to happen.

Schulz: It feels like I’m taking a course in university accounting or something.

Tack: That’s how it has felt. The fact that we never needed to know any of this. Nobody ever wanted to see the debt portfolio. Nobody ever needed to know that or wanted to know it.

Schulz: Do you think that this is going to change moving forward the things that the Faculty Senate does focus on? 

Tack: We just never know, semester to semester, what the issues of the day are going to be. I think we have a strong, very strong Faculty Senate model, actually one of the strongest from what we hear from some higher ed researchers. So I feel very confident that we are going to continue to vigorously advocate for faculty moving forward. 

I do think this process is changing us, and I said, it’s kind of like COVID. It changed us. We’re not exactly sure how, in some ways, but it changed us. I think this process is changing us across WVU. And again, I think faculty are becoming more aware of how the university operates from a business standpoint. And I think, or I hope, that the administration is finding that transparency and a more open partnership. They’ve been willing to be partners, we have extraordinary access. But this transparency may not be as scary as they thought it would be. It always has downsides. We want to know, and then we know, and we’re like, oh, we don’t want to know. But we can handle it, I think. Other aspects, other constituencies can handle it. And, it helps us understand it and frankly, I think this was going to, in the long run, help us all do our jobs better, faculty and non-faculty. But right now, it’s extremely painful.

Schulz: Have you heard about or have you been in contact with folks at other universities that are going through similar processes like this or similar? You know, adjustment pains? 

Tack: As a senate, we haven’t that I’m aware of. I haven’t and I know our recent past president, I don’t believe has. Our leadership has, our president has, and our provost has. And what they’re sharing with us is that other universities, not all but many, are going through similar things. We may be, from what I can tell and from what President Gee’s shared with us, being a little more head on with it. I don’t know, even with some really big deficits, some of the other institutions, whether they’re looking at reductions in force or not. 

I do know that there are some who were doing it really all behind the curtain so it’s hard to know. Again, we’ve pushed for this to not be behind the curtain, that we’ve just got to put it all out there. We’ve got to work together. President Gee said we need to move quickly and that will help. I think that’s true. That has its own pains associated with it, especially during the summer, but we’re certainly not the only one. And I will say, I had to prove that to myself. They told us that at the beginning and everything they’ve shared with us, I’ve kind of had to go out there and prove for myself not that I don’t trust them, but I do trust them. But I also know there are different frames and different ways people look at things. So there are many, many universities going through this. It is by far not only at WVU.

Schulz: I do want to give you an opportunity to talk to me about anything that I haven’t prompted you to talk about already. Anything that I’ve missed, that you think is important for me to know about the situation.

Tack: I think WVU is an amazing institution. It is going through probably one of the most difficult times it’s ever been through. Having said that, though, our faculty are amazing. We have a commitment to this state, I think that few flagships probably do or a level of commitment, not trying to minimize any of the others. But you look around WVU and there’s such passion and commitment to the work people do, to try and improve lives for West Virginians, to really fulfill our land grant mission. 

And I tell people who are considering working at WVU, I’ve been at another land grant, and we knew it was a land grant. But it didn’t inform the work, it didn’t inform the teaching. And that’s not the case here. So I think this is a very unique place and it has a heart that a lot of other places may not have, and that our faculty are world class. They’re resilient. We’re gonna land on our feet, I’m highly confident that we are going to land on our feet and dust ourselves off and figure out where we go from here.

I think there are a lot of different perspectives. The one other thing I would say is this process is data driven. We’ve heard a lot of comments, some of which aren’t data driven. And so we’re really trying not to speculate, but instead find out facts. I think that’s not only driving the self-study process and where we’re going with transformation, but it also needs to drive how we as faculty respond to what’s happening.

Exit mobile version