W.Va. Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Gov. Justice's Residency

The West Virginia Supreme Court has rejected a lawmaker’s effort to force Gov. Jim Justice to live in Charleston.

The court earlier this month voted 4-0 to toss a challenge from Pendleton County Democratic Delegate Isaac Sponaugle.

Sponaugle asked the court to order Justice to live in Charleston because the state constitution requires the governor to “reside at the seat of government.” Justice has said he lives at his Lewisburg home in Greenbrier County, not at the governor’s mansion.

An attorney for Justice has said the governor regularly uses the mansion and complies with the constitution.

Justice Tim Armstead disqualified himself from the case. Armstead was appointed by Justice to temporarily serve on the court before winning the seat in November’s election.

A similar challenge filed in Kanawha County Circuit Court was dismissed.

Lawmaker Refiles Challenge Over Governor's Residence

A Democratic West Virginia lawmaker has refiled a legal challenge of Republican Gov. Jim Justice’s residency.

News outlets report Delegate Isaac Sponaugle of Pendleton filed a petition Tuesday for writ of mandamus against Justice, asking the court to require the governor to live at the seat of government, as the West Virginia Constitution and state code require.

A West Virginia judge dismissed a previous petition filed by Sponaugle because he didn’t provide the state advanced notice of the lawsuit.

Justice has said several times that he does not live at the governor’s mansion in Charleston, but at his Lewisburg home in Greenbrier County. An attorney for Justice has said the governor regularly uses the mansion and complies with the constitution. Attorney Brian Abraham said the challenge is without merit and not grounded in fact.

Judge Seeks More Information in Gov. Justice Residency Suit Before Ruling on Motions

A Kanawha County Circuit Court Judge asked for more information Monday on motions in a lawsuit that seeks to compel Gov. Jim Justice to reside in Charleston.

 

Isaac Sponaugle, a Democratic member of the House of Delegates, filed a lawsuit in June to compel Gov. Justice to meet a state constitutional requirement that he reside in the state capital of Charleston.

 

Judge Charles King questioned Sponaugle during Monday’s hearing on how the governor’s residency would or could be enforced.

 

Sponaugle had filed a motion to compel discovery of evidence and sanction Gov. Justice for not turning over discovery. Gov. Justice’s counsel sought to have the case dismissed because Sponaugle didn’t give 30 days notice before the suit was filed.

 

No ruling was issued on either matter.

 

Judge King has asked Sponaugle and the governor’s counsel to submit proposed orders outlining their respective motions before a ruling will take place.

Gov. Justice Sued Over Constitutional Residency Requirement

A member of the West Virginia House of Delegates has filed suit against Gov. Jim Justice over a provision in the state constitution requiring the governor to reside in the state capital.

Del. Isaac Sponaugle, a Democrat, filed a complaint in Kanawha County Circuit Court stating that Gov. Justice has not lived in Charleston or conducted the business of his office in the state’s capital.

Section I, Article VII of the West Virginia Constitution says that the governor — as well as elected constitutional officers of the state’s government, including the attorney general, the auditor, the treasurer, the secretary of state and the commissioner of agriculture — “shall reside at the seat of government during their terms of office, keep there the public records, books and papers pertaining to their respective offices, and shall perform such duties as may be prescribed by law.”

The seat of the state’s government is Charleston.

Sponaugle’s suit — calling for a “writ of mandamus” be issued that will force Justice to meet the constitutional residency requirement — states that the governor “has not resided at the seat of government for more than 10 days from January 16, 2017” through the date of the petition, which is dated Tuesday, June 19.

At a https://youtu.be/Un2YEE6lFhY?t=25m45s”>news conference last week, Justice gave no indication of plans to move to Charleston. He also listed accomplishments since taking office in defending where he conducts business and resides.

 

Asked about the legalities of the decision to not stay at the Governor’s Mansion, Justice referred the question to his general counsel, Brian Abraham.

“There’s domicile and there’s residence. That mansion there, this man right there has furniture in there — it stays there,” Abraham said last week. “If he wants to go back to his home in Lewisburg — I know prior governors went back to their homes on weekends and evenings. I’ll tell you, I think he declared this his domicile.”

In regard to where Justice conducts his business as governor, Sponagule’s suit states that Justice himself said at that same news conference, “It does not matter whether I do it in the back of a Suburban or from the top of the dome.”

Additional documents from the filing show that, as part of the discovery process, Sponaugle is asking Justice to admit he does not reside at the Governor’s Mansion and does not plan to do so. Other requests include questions about how many nights Justice has spent at the Governor’s Mansion and how many days he has physically spent at the state capitol.

 

Justice issued a news release responding to the suit Thursday. He called it a “political stunt” that would come at a cost to taxpayers.

 

 “This petition is filled with falsehoods and we will address each and every one at the proper time. It’s a shame that Delegate Sponaugle has chosen to engage in a political stunt that has no purpose but to waste the valuable time and resources of the executive branch and the West Virginia court system,” Justice said in the statement.  “Delegate Sponaugle, a far-left politician, never brought this up when I was a Democrat, but now that an election year is upon us he chose to file this lawsuit to score cheap political points.”

 

In a Thursday interview, Sponaugle said the suit wasn’t a political maneuver targeting Justice, who is a Republican.

 

“It isnotapoliticalployormaneuver.I’vehadnumerous Republicanscontactmealldaylong — moresothan Democrats — [to say] theyweregladtoseeit,” Sponaugle said.

 

“Wearegovernedbylaws,werespecttheruleoflaw. Andifyoubelievethatyou’reaboveit — whichisthecaserighthere — if I have to take you tocourtjustmakeyoushowuptowork, thenI’lltakeyoutocourtto make you showuptowork,” he added.

 

The suit against Justice follows complaints by other Democratic state lawmakers who have questioned Justice’s presence around the capitol and called for the governor’s resignation.

House Continues Fight Over Funding Bill

Members of the House of Delegates are still debating a bill that would take money from the Rainy Day Fund to balance the 2016 budget, but it’s a fight over PEIA, the public employee’s health insurance program, that’s stalling the crucial legislation.

Senate Bill 364 was requested by Governor Tomblin to help close a nearly $400 million budget shortfall for this year. It takes nearly $52 million from the Rainy Day fund to help close the gap.

But Democrats in the House tried to amend the bill Monday to take an additional $58 million from the state’s reserve fund to cover another shortfall in the public employee’s health insurance agency – one that will cause costs to increase for state employees and retirees.

“This is the first financial bill that’s come before this House,” said Democratic Delegate Isaac Sponaugle of Pendleton County, “it’s an emergency situation. We are now on the twentieth day of legislative session; nearly one third through, and yet, we have yet to address the PEIA funding crisis in the state of West Virginia.”

The Democratic amendment to help fund PEIA was voted down. Many Republicans called it an irresponsible use of one time monies to fix a long term funding problem.

“We are all very concerned about the PEIA shortfall,” said House Finance Chairman, Delegate Eric Nelson of Kanawha County, “It’s been projected that in fiscal year 2017, so that’s the year that starts July 1 and goes forward, it’s projected that there’s a shortfall of $120 million. There’s not been legislation that has come before any committees yet, but I guarantee you there will be legislation to address that particular shortfall…but we’re talking about using one time monies out of our savings account, our Rainy Day Fund, to fund an ongoing obligation that hits it for one year, but what about the future years?”

The bill to take money from the Rainy Day Fund will be up for a vote Tuesday in the House.

House Clashes Over Governor's Funding Bill

On the House floor Friday, Delegates were set to consider a bill recently approved by the Senate – a bill to help balance the 2016 budget. Senate Bill 364 was on second reading until members of the GOP majority made a tactical move to block a Democratic amendment.

Senate Bill 364 should have been read for a second time on the House floor Friday, but after a move by House Majority Leader Daryl Cowles, it was held over – at first with no explanation.

The bill would pull some 52 million dollars from the state’s Rainy Day fund to help balance the current budget. Governor Tomblin’s budget officials say the state will end the fiscal year with a 384 million dollar budget gap, but West Virginia lawmakers are constitutionally required to balance the budget each fiscal year.

Democrats aimed to amend the Senate bill by taking additional dollars from the Rainy Day account to help fund state employee healthcare benefits through PEIA or the Public Employees Insurance Agency. The state is struggling to fully fund the benefits and has proposed increasing the amount employees pay for health insurance coverage.

Democrats like Delegate Isaac Sponaugle of Pendleton County jumped on the move by the majority party during the remarks portion of the floor session.

“We believe, we truly believe with over 800 million dollars in the Rainy Day Fund in the state of West Virginia, it’s raining on teachers. There’s a 120 million dollar shortfall. This past year, which we’re talking about, the 35 million dollars in benefit cuts and 33 million dollars drained out of the account. Now this does not put all of 120 million dollars back into the account, but it’s a start.” – Delegate Isaac Sponaugle, D-Pendleton County

Speaker Tim Armstead says the attempted Democratic amendment was a political maneuver, not a real solution to fixing the PEIA funding problem.

“We’re trying to work through the issue of addressing both the PEIA needs and the immediate budget needs of the state, and I don’t think they’re trying to that. I think they’re trying to play political games to try to say, and so they can run out and say, oh, you know, everyone voted against PEIA, no we’re working toward a solution on PEIA with the governor…but the Democrats have come out against their own governor’s proposal to solve the PEIA issue…they’re trying to take the money that their own governor says needs to be put in place to pay our bills now in order to solve this problem, and I don’t think that’s a solution that will work.” – House Speaker Tim Armstead, R-Kanawha County

Armstead_PEIA_Bite.mp3
House Speaker Tim Armstead, R-Kanawha County

Senate Bill 364 will be back on the House calendar Monday. Governor Tomblin’s administration is calling the bill critical to funding the state for the remainder of the fiscal year and has asked lawmakers to approve it by the end of next week.

Exit mobile version