Republican Gov. Justice Defends Record On Coronavirus, Education And Business In Debate With Democrat Salango

Republican incumbent Gov. Jim Justice’s record on the coronavirus, education and other policies were under scrutiny Tuesday night as he faced off in a debate against his Democratic challenger Ben Salango.

The candidates took shots at one another, but also found some common ground on issues that have created partisan divides across the nation.

The debate — hosted by the West Virginia Broadcasters Association and moderated by Hoppy Kercheval of WVMetroNews — is likely to be the only debate in the race for the state’s chief executive.

Throughout the hour-long broadcast, billionaire businessman-turned-politician Justice defended his administration’s response to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, which as of Tuesday morning had killed at least 387 West Virginians.

Since the pandemic hit the state in mid-March, public health officials have recorded 18,555 cases — of which 4,687 are considered active.

With schools resuming learning as of early September, Justice’s administration has made a variety of tweaks to a set of metrics to guide reopenings, including a map that has drawn criticism from public educators.

“You know the situation is fluid. You know you have to change and everything. We listen to the experts, we don’t listen to the union bosses to tell us what to do. We listen to the medical and the educational experts. Along the way, you have to adjust. You know, that’s all there is to it,” Justice said. “I’ve said it many, many times, but a pandemic is no different than a trip to the moon.”

Salango — an attorney, businessman and Kanawha County Commissioner — said schools being open is a high priority, but he argued that the map guiding the school reopenings is being manipulated so that more counties have opened for in-person instruction.

“We need to make sure that we’re putting public health ahead of politics — and anytime you take a map and then you do political polls and adjust the metrics based on the polls, you’re putting politics ahead of public health. That’s something we don’t need to do,” Salango said.

Salango took aim at Justice’s legal woes, including a long history of lawsuits over unpaid debts. He also noted a federal investigation into Justice’s businesses that yielded no indictments.

“We need a governor we can be proud of — not someone who’s constantly bogged down in controversy,” Salango said.

Salango also poked at Justice for an ongoing lawsuit attempting to compel him to abide by a constitutional mandate and live in the state capital of Charleston.

“For people preoccupied where I go to bed at night, I have spent all my time in Charleston using the mansion to my benefit,” Justice rebutted. “I don’t use the mansion for perks. I have been on the state helicopter one time. I don’t use the mansion for a party every night. What in the world does that have to do with anything?”

The case regarding Justice’s residency is slated for oral arguments Wednesday in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.

“You don’t get to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution you follow,” Salango said. “And so, you know, if you’re going to run for governor, you have to understand that comes with it that you have to live in the seat of government — you have to live in Charleston.”

The two candidates also split on major national issues, including ongoing protests of police brutality and racial injustice.

“We have a division in our country and with us looting and burning in our cities and not demonstrating in a peaceful manner,” Justice said. “I’ve got a real problem with it. I’ve got a real problem first not funding our police. Yeah, do Black Lives Matter? Well, of course Black Lives Matter — and they matter just like all lives matter. And we should absolutely always try to work together.”

Salango also argued that Justice has a record of being insensitive to other races, including an incident earlier this year in which the governor called a predominantly Black girls basketball team “thugs” after a heated game.

“I reject the proposition that’s out there that you either have to be pro-law enforcement or pro-Black Lives Matter. I’m endorsed by law enforcement. I’m proud of that endorsement,” Salango said. “But I’m also proud of the fact that I stand up against inequality.”

While Justice and Salango parted ways on many issues, they did agree on a few items affecting West Virginia and the rest of the nation.

When it comes to legislation that would ensure equal rights for state residents who identify as lesibian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer, both Salango and Justice said they support such a measure. Salango said the state needs to be welcoming to everyone.

“One of the things that companies look for when they come in is whether or not it’s welcoming. They look at whether or not you know it’s an equal opportunity — equal rights state — and I support the LGBTQ community,” Salango said.

For nearly two decades, a “Fairness Act” to ensure employment and housing protections for the LGBTQ community has been introduced in the Legislature, although multiple attempts to move the bill to a vote in recent sessions has failed. However, Justice said Tuesday he would support such legislation if it came across his desk.

“I think, really, truly that we have no place in our society to be discriminatory towards anyone at any time. I mean that’s terrible to do and it’s degrading and so I concur,” said Justice, agreeing with Salango.

Asked by moderator Kercheval whether he would sign such legislation, Justice clearly said that he would.

Both candidates expressed support of the state’s as-of-yet launched medical cannabis program, but neither said they support joining 12 states and the District of Columbia to legalize the plant for recreational use.

“We have a terrible drug situation in West Virginia right now and we do not need something else to add to that situation,” Justice said.

Salango said he worries about the potential for those driving under the influence of marijuana to cause accidents.

“Until there’s a roadside test so we don’t give up on public safety, I won’t be in favor of full legalization,” Salango said “But I will say, you know, it is an opportunity for additional revenue. It is an opportunity to help people get off of opioids and get off of more hardcore drugs, but I do worry about the public safety aspect of it.”

Libertarian Party candidate Erika Kolenich and Mountain Party candidate Danny Lutz are also on the ballot for governor in the 2020 general election. Neither candidate was invited to take part in Tuesday’s debate.

Those registered to vote can apply for an absentee ballot through Oct. 28. Completed absentee ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day. Early in-person voting runs from Oct. 21 through Oct. 31.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 3.

Manchin, Morrisey Spar During Only U.S. Senate Debate in W.Va.

Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican challenger Patrick Morrisey sparred Thursday night over the opioid epidemic, tax cuts, the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and more during the only debate of their campaign.

Both candidates talked over each other often during the testy debate as they tried to get their points across.

Manchin, a moderate Democrat seeking his second full term in the Senate, highlighted his bipartisan work and labeled Morrisey as a “yes man” for Republican President Donald Trump.

Morrisey, a two-term state attorney general, made sure to hammer home three points.

Nine times during the one-hour debate Morrisey referred to Manchin as a “dishonest Washington liberal.” He often brought up Manchin’s support of 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and excitedly advertised the scheduled appearance Friday of Trump in Huntington. It’s his third visit to the state to rally for Morrisey.

Trump won West Virginia by 42 percentage points over Clinton in 2016. He became popular in Appalachia for making broad promises to put coal miners back to work, despite grim economic forecasts for the industry.

“Senator Manchin supported Hillary Clinton when it really mattered the most,” Morrisey said.

Manchin fired back, “Hillary Clinton is not on the ballot.”

Manchin renewed his criticism of Morrisey’s past lobbying ties to the pharmaceutical industry and said he profited from the flooding of prescription pain pills into the state.

West Virginia leads the nation by far in the rate of drug overdose deaths. Morrisey said such deaths in the state doubled when Manchin was governor from 2004 to 2010.

“We’re going to attack this opioid epidemic,” Morrisey said. “The reality is, when you heard from me, you can count on what I say. Senator Manchin, you can’t trust anything he says.”

Manchin repeated criticism of Morrisey joining 19 other states in a federal lawsuit that seeks to overturn former President Barack Obama’s health care law, including popular insurance protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions. Morrisey said he had no intention of getting rid of those protections.

Manchin replied, “If you drop your lawsuit, we’re good.”

A moderator asked Manchin why he waited until the last minute to decide to support Kavanaugh’s nomination. Manchin quickly pointed out he was the only Democrat to support Kavanaugh. “The vote is the vote — nothing’s going to change,” Manchin said.

Morrisey jumped on the chance to say that Manchin “took a powder in the bathroom” and enabled Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine to cast the deciding vote.

Morrisey said he supports Republican-sponsored tax cuts to stimulate the state’s economy, while Manchin said he voted against Trump’s cuts because of spiraling debt and inflation worries.

“We’ve written checks our children will never cash,” Manchin said.

The candidates also sparred over immigration and a proposed constitutional amendment to allow lawmakers to restrict or ban taxpayer-funded abortions. Morrisey said he supports the amendment, while Manchin is against it because it does not include exceptions to save the life of the mother and in cases of rape or incest.

Republicans view the election as a chance to flip a U.S. Senate seat that Manchin has held since 2010. He’s among 10 Senate Democrats up for re-election in states Trump won.

Senate Candidates Manchin, Morrisey Agree to Debate

The U.S. Senate campaign of Republican Patrick Morrisey says he has accepted an invitation to debate incumbent Democrat Joe Manchin on Nov. 1.

Morrisey’s campaign says in a news release that the state attorney general has accepted an invitation from the West Virginia Broadcasters Association. Manchin campaign spokesman Grant Herring says Manchin had already accepted the group’s invitation.

A location for the debate has not been announced.

Morrisey’s campaign wants Manchin to agree to at least three debates. Herring says Manchin’s campaign is reviewing the requests.

The election is Nov. 6.

Senate Bill Removes Remnants of Common Core in W.Va.

A bill to prohibit any Common Core-based education standards from being taught in West Virginia classrooms was taken up in the Senate’s Education committee Saturday. The standards have been debated for years at the statehouse and now lawmakers are looking at legislation that specifies what can be taught.

Common Core education standards have been a central point of debate in the West Virginia Legislature for years now.

In December 2015, the West Virginia Board of Education responded to concerns raised by both lawmakers and members of the public over the standards and voted to repeal them. They were replaced with the current education standards taught in West Virginia schools – the West Virginia College and Career Ready Standards.

These new standards were the result of an 8-month study led by state Superintendent Dr. Michael Martirano who consulted with West Virginia teachers, higher education officials, as well as members of the public.

But during the 2016 state Legislative session, lawmakers were still concerned – saying the West Virginia College and Career Ready Standards were too similar to Common Core.

This year, lawmakers are attempting again to get rid of any remnants of Common Core with Senate Bill 524.

The bill prohibits Common Core based standards in West Virginia schools, and requires teachers to use two specific sets of standards in their place:  math standards from California adopted in 1997 and English-Language Arts standards from Massachusetts adopted in 2001.

Republican Senator Patricia Rucker from Jefferson County is the bill’s lead sponsor and a former educator. She says it’s important West Virginia get rid of Common Core and bring in something that’s been nationally recognized and proven to work.

“Massachusetts is nationally recognized as one of the best school systems; California, same thing,” Rucker said, “Both of these standards are before Common Core. No one can say that it has any relationship to Common Core, so we are making the constituents happy.”

Another requirement in the bill is that these new standards be implemented for at least five years, starting on July 1, 2017. Rucker says that’s so that both teachers and students have continuity.

“I know administrators; they have been told to do this, this year, something else the next year, something else the next year; they want stability, so that’s one of the reasons the bill says, we’re going to keep these standards for five years,” she noted.

However, if any changes are proposed to the standards within that timeframe, a 60-day written comment period would be required and at least four public hearings in various locations around the state.

Surprisingly, after the years of heated debates over anything related to Common Core, there were no questions or discussion in committee Saturday. However, a handful of senators did vote not to advance the bill.

Senate Bill 524 now goes to the full chamber for consideration.

Gas Pipeline Draws Support, Opposition, in West Virginia

West Virginia residents were divided during the final state public hearing on the proposed Mountain Valley Pipeline, which would carry natural gas down the center of West Virginia for 195 miles.

Several urged state permit approvals for the project and its jobs. Some others at the Thursday hearing warned of damage from construction, erosion and the aerial herbicide spraying along the right of way that would continue perpetually.

Greg Hefner, a FirstEnergy manager representing the Harrison County Economic Development Corp., said construction would involve about $811 million in capital expenditures in the area, $47 million in state and local tax revenue and 4,500 jobs and pay taxes during its lifetime. “West Virginia simply cannot afford to lose out on this unique opportunity,” he said.

But Tom Bond, a farmer and retired professor with a Ph.D. in organic chemistry, said the company will take land in perpetuity, and other land will be affected. He added that the science shows fossil fuels are warming the planet’s climate.

“It’s my opinion that these are a disaster waiting to happen,” Bond said of the new large pipeline projects proposed for West Virginia.

“The problem is the short-range outlook of most people,” the 82-year-old said after the hearing.

The pipeline would extend south from north-central West Virginia through 11 counties to the Virginia state line and 108 miles through six counties in that state.

Kevin Williams said gas lines run across his family’s farm, some 40 or 50 years old and some more recent. “I’ve seen good jobs and I’ve seen bad jobs. I’d like to say some of the newer ones, because of some of the environmental controls and things that are being required and put in place, they are better than a lot of the ones I’ve seen before.”

According to the main developer, EQT Corp., the project’s estimated cost is $3.5 billion. It would transport “abundant” natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica shale formations beneath the Appalachians with full service expected in late 2018, provided it gets needed approvals. EQT updated its application and proposed route at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in October, a year after it was first filed, to protect environmentally sensitive areas and have the least impact on landowners, the company said.

West Virginia’s Department of Environmental Protection held three hearings this week in Summers, Webster and Harrison counties. The DEP is considering permits governing water quality, stream preservation and water pollution controls.

Agency officials said they will reply to each person who commented at the hearings.

House Democrats Attempt to Evade Committee Process with Marijuana Amendment

Democrats in the House of Delegates Thursday attempted to change the scheduling classification of marijuana so it could be prescribed by doctors.

House Bill 2526 focuses on adding drugs to the state’s scheduling system, a classification of both prescription and illicit drugs. These classifications are referred to as Schedule I, II, IV, and V.

Schedule I drugs are substances seen as having no medicinal purposes and cannot be prescribed by a doctor. These are illegal substances, like heroin or cocaine.

Marijuana is currently a Schedule I substance. Democrats attempted to change that classification to allow doctors to prescribe it in West Virginia.

Democrat Isaac Sponaugle from Pendleton County, a sponsor of the amendment, argued 28 other states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana.

“The people are with this issue,” Sponaugle said, “Sixty-some percent of West Virginians are tired; they want this legislative body to act.”

A handful of Republicans spoke in favor of the amendment, but it ultimately failed 35 to 64.

So far this legislative session, two bills have been introduced in both the House and Senate to legalize medical marijuana in the state. One has bi-partisan support. Neither bills have been heard by any committees.

Exit mobile version