Pleasants Power Station Gets Temporary Reprieve

A major coal-fired power plant in Willow, Island West Virginia will not close in January 2019 as previous planned. Pleasants Power Station will remain open through May 2022 under a settlement agreement approved by a bankruptcy court last month.

A spokesperson for electric utility FirstEnergy Corp. — whose subsidiary Allegheny Energy Supply owns and operates the plant — said the plant’s ownership will change. The deal will allow Pleasants to continue operating past January 2019 when it was previously slated to close.

“Keeping Pleasants in operation through May 2022 allows the plant to fulfill current capacity obligations and provides additional time for evaluation of the long-term plan for the station prior to deactivation,” Jennifer Young, a spokesperson for FirstEnergy Corp., said in an email.

Allegheny Energy Supply will transfer the plant to bankrupt subsidiary, FirstEnergy Solutions. The deal is part of a larger settlement agreement approved by a bankruptcy court last month.

Under the agreement, FirstEnergy Corp. will make a settlement payment of $225 million to FirstEnergy Solutions and issue $628 million in notes for the subsidiary that will mature on Dec. 31, 2022. Collectively, this money will be used to pay down the $2.1 billion owed to its creditors.

Allegheny Energy Supply will continue to operate Pleasants until the transfer is complete. A date has not been set for when that will happen. Under the agreement, FirstEnergy Corp. will continue to own the plant’s coal ash impoundment, McElroy’s Run, and any related liabilities.

In 2016 FirstEnergy Corp. put Pleasants, which employs about 190 people, up for sale. The company announced in February it would close the 1,300 megawatt power plant unless it could find a buyer. An attempt to sell the power plant to other FirstEnergy subsidiaries, Potomac Edison and Monongahela Power, was shot down by federal regulators earlier this year.

Federal Help?

In a statement, Gov. Jim Justice praised the move and specifically thanked President Trump, Department of Energy Secretary Rick Perry and others for their help “to make sure this plant stays open.”

However, it’s unclear what role the federal government played. A plan to bail out coal and nuclear plants by forcing grid operators to buy power from those struggling plants for two years has stalled.

The plan floated a series of possible federal interventions that relied on the argument that the power generated by coal and nuclear plants is essential for the country’s national security.

One statute outlined in the plan is the 1950 Defense Production Act. The law addresses options for keeping essential supply chain facilities open during wartime or similar emergencies.

The Department of Energy could also use emergency powers under the Federal Power Act. Known as section 202(c), the provision would allow the agency to intervene if the electricity grid faces an emergency. In the past, it has been used during times of war and during natural disasters.

FirstEnergy Solutions lobbied the agency to immediately intervene to stop a series of plant closures. Days later, it declared bankruptcy.

Recent reporting by Politico indicates the bailout plan, as written, has been shelved because it faces opposition from inside the White House.

A request to both the Department of Energy and governor’s office for more information went unanswered.

Even if the federal government revives the plan, many energy analysts say subsidies will only go so far to help keep struggling coal plants going because they do not change the underling market forces: cheap natural gas and stagnant energy demand growth have made coal a more expensive source of electcity.

In June, federal regulators did order regional grid operator PJM Interconnection to redesign how it buys electricity, which could benefit Pleasants down the road. Many of the proposals being considered eliminate the effects of state-subsidized nuclear and renewable resources, which would place electricty generated by coal plants, including Pleasants, on a more even footing.

Officials are not expected to finalize the redesign until 2020.

Two Groups Oppose Sale of West Virginia Coal-Fired Plant

Environmental advocates are urging West Virginia’s Public Service Commission to reject two power companies’ proposal to pay $195 million for a 37-year-old coal-fired power plant, saying it will saddle 530,000 ratepayers with the expenses and market risks.

Monongahela Power Co. and Potomac Edison Co. this year proposed purchasing the 1,300-megawatt-capacity plant along the Ohio River near Belmont from Allegheny Energy Supply.

They called it “the least-cost source to meet a steadily increasing capacity shortfall” in the utilities’ service areas that would initially cut average ratepayer bills by about $12 annually.

In a brief to the commission, West Virginia Citizen Action Group and West Virginia Solar United Neighborhoods say the sale among FirstEnergy Corp. entities mainly shifts risks and costs from the corporation to customers whose rates would rise later.

Hearings in September on West Virginia Power Station Plan

The public will have a chance to comment on two power companies’ proposal to purchase the Pleasants Power Station in West Virginia from Allegheny Energy Supply.

The Public Service Commission is holding three hearings next month. The first will be Sept. 6 in Parkersburg, followed by Sept. 11 in Martinsburg and Sept. 12 in Morgantown. An evidentiary hearing on the $195 million deal will be Sept. 26 to 28 in Charleston.

Monongahela Power Co. and the Potomac Edison Co. propose purchasing the coal-fired plant, which is located on the Ohio River near Belmont, northeast of Parkersburg.

Supreme Court Upholds PSC Approved Power Plant Sale

The West Virginia Supreme Court has sided with the state Public Service Commission on a decision to allow the sale of a Harrison County power plant.

The PSC approved the sale of Harrison Power Station in October 2013. In the deal, Mon Power would obtain about 80 percent ownership of the plant from Allegheny Energy Supply and become its sole owner.

In return, Allegheny would receive about 8 percent ownership of the Pleasants Power Station, becoming its sole owner as well, and $257 million. Mon Power has said they will pass the cost of the merger on to its consumers in their electricity rates.

The Citizen Action Group appealed the PSC’s decision, saying the price markup ruling violates stipulations of the merger agreement and contradicts commission policy.

The merger agreement CAG cites includes requirements for Mon Power to increase employment, invest in economic development, aid low income customers, increase energy efficiency programs, as well as other stipulations.

In a written opinion Wednesday, members of the state’s highest court disagreed with CAG and affirmed the original PSC approved agreement.

The transaction between Mon Power and Allegheny Energy, both First Energy subsidiaries, has already closed, but Mon has not yet increased rates for customers.
 

Exit mobile version