Lawmakers Begin Digesting Executive Budget Proposal

Gov. Jim Justice has asked lawmakers to do a politically unpopular thing this state Legislative session — raise taxes. But legislative leaders say they are still on the hunt for cuts to state government. Both the House and Senate Finance committees held meetings Thursday and heard from the Governor’s budget team, who attempted to convince lawmakers to see things the governor’s way.

 

 

On Wednesday night, Gov. Jim Justice presented lawmakers with his plan to balance the 2018 budget. The latest estimates from state revenue officials show there’s a nearly $500 million budget gap in the upcoming fiscal year, and in short, Justice wants to close it by increasing taxes and making some minor cuts. His proposal would create $450 million in new taxes and cut government spending almost $27 million.

 

But during his State of the State Address, the Governor’s Office also released what they are calling an alternative budget — a list of government agencies that would have to be cut if lawmakers choose not to raise any taxes this session. Justice’s alternative budget would close colleges and universities, the Department of Veterans’ Assistance, and end most senior services, among many other things. That alternative plan concerned the Minority Chairman of House Finance Delegate Brent Boggs, D-Braxton.

 

“When we’re faced with this kind of a deficit, we can’t possibly cut state government to the point that we lose so many vital services for so many segments of our population,” Boggs explained, “so I think that he said that he’s open to other cuts, but I think to think that we can possibly cut $450 million out and not really make West Virginia a very difficult place to live and to work, I think he’s right on point.”

 

On only the second day of the legislative session, there’s quite a way to go before lawmakers put a final spending plan in place, but Boggs said he’s optimistic about Justice’s proposal.

 

“He’s giving us how it is,” Boggs noted, “I don’t think; it’s something that’s sometimes, the medicine’s kind of bitter to take, but I think the takeaway, we need to make sure we do right by the citizens of this state.”

 

Thursday morning, representatives of the state budget and the governor’s offices presented the governor’s plan in more detail — details House Finance Chairman Eric Nelson, R-Kanawha, said were not included in Justice’s State of the State Address.

 

So he said he and his colleagues are just scratching the surface of the proposal.

 

“I look at some of the positives that were out there, you know tourism in areas of the state; infrastructure, but you know, the devil’s in the details, and gosh our back’s are against the wall,” Nelson said, “and so we’ve got to work all the way around; find areas of compromise, and many of his secretaries have only been in their position two weeks, so let’s work through this.”

 

Thursday afternoon, across the rotunda — members of the Senate Finance Committee were given that same detailed presentation by the director of the State Budget Office, Mark McKown. He was asked about that alternative budget made up solely of cuts to government, first by Sen. Corey Palumbo, D-Kanawha.

 

“Was the point of this exercise to come up with the cuts that [would be the least harmful] or the most shocking?” Palumbo asked.

McKown said the Governor’s Office wanted to avoid cuts to public education and most Medicaid coverage while also keeping the state’s prisons and jails open, but otherwise, McKown said there isn’t much left in the budget to cut.

 

Senate Finance Chairman Mike Hall added his own thoughts.

 

“Obviously, to a lot of minds it would be unacceptable to do several of the things on here,” Hall said, “The question is, are there other things not on here that total up to a substantial amount of money and my belief is, having looked at the budget, there are not other things unless you go to the school aid formula or the Medicaid line.”

Hall said his Finance Committee will split into subgroups to dig through smaller sections of the budget to find additional places to cut. That work will begin after the committee hears from all of the state agencies during their budget presentations this month.

Legislative Leaders React to Justice's Budget Plan

Governor Jim Justice’s State of the State address brought a mixed bag of reactions Wednesday night. And from the majority party, it wasn’t exactly a happy one.

A lot of things were different in Governor Justice’s State of the State address Wednesday. It could be said his speech was unique compared to past governors. For one, he gave his speech out on the floor instead of at the House Clerk’s desk. Two, he used a whiteboard to break down some of the proposals in his speech and even had some volunteers walk in to demonstrate a part of the presentation.

His speech was colorful, and he used stories and descriptions to get his points across. However, it was his proposal on ways to balance the state budget that had many in the majority party concerned.

Justice proposed almost $30 million in cuts, but also proposed a number of tax increases – a gasoline tax, a DMV tax, an increase in the sales tax – that House and Senate leadership say they will not support as presented.

House Speaker Tim Armstead says Justice made promises on the campaign trail that he’s breaking in his budget proposal.

“You know, the governor campaigned on the fact that the people of West Virginia were overtaxed and that we needed to reduce the size of government,” Armstead said, “and yet, here we have a budget that’s been submitted that has roughly $28 million in cuts, which is much less than we were even talking about last summer, and significant tax increases that I think are going to have a really hard time getting through this process in the House and I believe in the Senate.”

House Minority Leader Tim Miley, however, says he was pleased with what he heard from Justice.

“We have a governor who said he was going to bring bold ideas, and that’s what we heard this evening,” Miley noted, “I mean, we heard a governor talk about options we have. We can either continue digging the hole deeper and cutting and cutting and cutting and not moving forward at all, or we can decide to take some bold steps and try to raise revenue and create thousands of jobs.”

While Miley says he likes what he heard, he also says he would want to look more thoroughly at the numbers before saying he’d definitely support the proposals.

Like Armstead, Senate President Mitch Carmichael also says he’s disappointed with the tax increases, saying he didn’t see much promise in Justice’s budget proposals.

“I would not characterize them as bold ideas,” Carmichael said, “This is a tired, worn out, old hat strategy of; it resembles governments of the past in which, rather than overhauling and energizing this state government, you simply raise taxes on the poorest people in America.”

Even though both House and Senate leadership had some major issues with Justice’s proposals regarding the budget, they were happy with other areas, such as the regulatory reforms and the public education overhaul.

Budget Woes for 2017, Armstead Says Cuts Over Taxes

The West Virginia House and Senate met for the first day of the 2017 regular state Legislative session Wednesday.

 

The first official day of the 83rd West Virginia Legislative session began as House Speaker Tim Armstead and Senate President Mitch Carmichael gaveled in Wednesday.

 

 

Both chambers’ floor sessions were conducted without issue, but a large number of bills were introduced. In fact, 211 bills in the House and 198 in the Senate.

 

Speaker Armstead says the budget will be a major focus this year – West Virginia is facing a $600 million dollar shortfall – but he hopes it won’t be an overshadowing issue.

 

Armstead says he and other legislative leaders are eager to hear Governor Jim Justice’s State of the State address this evening, and he says, regarding the budget, the state will likely see cuts rather than an increase in taxes.

 

“The people of West Virginia are taxed too much,” said Armstead, “and so we’re going to have to right-size our government, make some cuts, do those in a responsible manner, but do it in a way that truly creates a government that reflects the ability of the people of West Virginia to fund government.”

 

Governor Justice said on the campaign trail he would not increase taxes.

 

Armstead also says he wants to see significant progress in changes to the education system and how the drug epidemic is handled, and make some legal and regulatory reforms.

 

Tune in this evening at 7:00 for Governor Justice’s State of the State address live on radio, television, and online. See wvpublic.org for more information.

Can Rehabilitating Historic Buildings Help W.Va.'s Economy?

West Virginia’s historic rehabilitation tax credit was put in place to encourage developers and property owners to take some of the state’s crumbling, historic structures and get them back into working order. The credit is also supposed to encourage the creation of local jobs while repurposing the underutilized buildings.

But the state’s tax credit is 10 percent, and a coalition of architects, economic developers, and others say that’s not enough to encourage the community development they’d like to see. That same group is now traveling the state looking for support as they prepare to ask state lawmakers to increase the tax credit.

Here at the old Shenandoah Hotel, which first opened in downtown Martinsburg in 1926, a group of community members – interested residents, city and county officials, and some state lawmakers from the area have gathered to hear about the potential benefits of increasing West Virginia’s historic rehabilitation tax credit.

The credit provides a 10 percent dollar-for-dollar reduction in income tax liability for renovation projects on buildings registered with the National Register of Historic Places. The owner is then responsible for the rest of the project costs.

That’s Lisa Dall’Olio. She’s an architect with Grove & Dall’Olio Architects based out of Gerrardstown in Berkeley County and she spoke at the Abandoned Properties Coalition sponsored forum.

Dall’Olio says an increase to the credit could mean an increase in the number of tourists who visit the state, looking for charm inherent in old buildings. But it could also mean an increase in state and local tax revenues.

“This is a perfect example of how tax credits, an increased tax credits could make somebody jump and do this project,” she said.

Dall’Olio and the Abandoned Properties Coalition would like to see state lawmakers bump the credit from 10 to 25 percent during the upcoming session to match neighboring states.

Nicole Marrocco is the Abandoned Properties Coalition coordinator for the West Virginia Community Development Hub.

“We’re in the Eastern Panhandle; we’re wedged between Maryland and Virginia, which are two states that have a higher tax credit, so we have the 20 percent tax credit in Maryland, the 25 percent tax credit in Virginia, and both states are seeing more development than we are here in the Eastern Panhandle,” Marrocco explained.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation tracked state tax dollars brought in by a similar federal tax credit between 2002 and 2015. Tax revenues in Virginia, where the state tax credit is 25 percent, were significantly higher during that time than in West Virginia—some $103 million compared to West Virginia’s $5 million. While those numbers are based on the study of a federal credit’s impact, Marrocco believes the state tax credit played a part in those revenues too. And West Virginia could see more money flowing into its coffers if lawmakers increased the rate.

Berkeley County Delegate Saira Blair attended the forum and says she sees it’s potential.

“It’s gonna be something that’s put on the table, I can guarantee that,” Blair said, “I don’t know if it’ll go through this year, because we’re looking at thousands of other things; our Finance committee is gonna be swamped, but one more thing to put out there is great for our state.”

Newly elected Senator Patricia Rucker, a Republican from Jefferson County, says she’s excited about the prospect of what increasing the historic tax credit could do for the state.

“We have historic areas all over the state, and actually, there are parts of our state which are so beautiful, people don’t even know,” she noted, “It’d be wonderful to increase our tourism dollars by letting this revitalization help all the areas of the state.”

Rucker says she would back legislation increasing the tax credit if it came before the legislature.

Abandoned Properties Coalition Meetings:

Wheeling
Wednesday, January 25, 8:30 – 10:30 a.m.
The Stone Center
REGISTER

Fairmont
Thursday, January 26, 1 – 3 p.m.
The Gatherings
REGISTER

Huntington
Wednesday, February 1, 4 – 6 p.m.
The Keith-Albee Theatre
REGISTER

Charleston
Thursday, February 2, 5 – 7 p.m.
The Art Store
REGISTER

 

Eastern Panhandle's Influence in Charleston Grows

Eastern Panhandle lawmakers met at an annual Legislative Breakfast Friday to discuss their top priorities for the 2017 Legislative session. Senators and delegates touched on a variety of issues, but what’s clear is the region’s growing influence at the statehouse.

Since the GOP won the majority in both chambers of the state Legislature two years ago, many Eastern Panhandle Republicans have been appointed to influential posts within their respective chambers.

To name just a few, Senator Charlie Trump of Morgan County chairs Senate Judiciary; Delegate Paul Espinosa of Jefferson County chairs House Education, and Delegate Daryl Cowles of Morgan County is the House Majority Leader. Cowles says having Eastern Panhandle representatives in key positions means the regions voice will be heard at the Capitol.

“It’s roles like that, those pivotal roles that make the difference that have our voice heard in Charleston and have issues of Charleston brought back home,” Cowles said.

The Eastern Panhandle is one of the most rapidly growing regions in West Virginia – a state that’s losing population overall. In the past, lawmakers from the area have criticized legislative leaders for ignoring the needs of the growing communities.

Exit mobile version