Supreme Court Hands EPA Rule’s Opponents A Temporary Victory

In a 5-4 decision Thursday, the court paused what’s known as the Good Neighbor Rule, an effort by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to limit nitrogen oxide, which forms smog and can drift into neighboring states.

Steam rises from the concrete cooling towers of a coal-burning power plant against a gray sky.

The U.S. Supreme Court has put a federal rule limiting ozone pollution from power plants on hold, for now.

In a 5-4 decision Thursday, the court paused what’s known as the Good Neighbor Rule, an effort by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to limit nitrogen oxide, which forms smog and can drift into neighboring states.

West Virginia, Ohio and Indiana led the challenge to the rule. The Supreme Court’s decision means the rule’s fate could be decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey argued that the rule could lead to power plant closures that would threaten the reliability of the electricity grid.

Indeed, the rule, should it survive, would require coal-burning plants to use the best available system to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions.

West Virginia has one plant, Mon Power’s Fort Martin Power Station, that currently lacks such technology. It is estimated to cost $500 million to make the upgrade.

Trump-appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court’s three liberal justices in dissent.

Author: Curtis Tate

Curtis is our Energy & Environment Reporter, based in Charleston. He has spent more than 17 years as a reporter and copy editor for Gannett, Dow Jones and McClatchy. He has written extensively about travel, transportation and Congress for USA TODAY, The Bergen Record, The Lexington Herald-Leader, The Wichita Eagle, The Belleville News-Democrat and The Sacramento Bee. You can reach him at ctate@wvpublic.org.

Exit mobile version