Mountain Valley Pipeline Seeks Ruling From Supreme Court

Congress last month passed a law that was supposed to allow construction to resume on the 300-mile natural gas pipeline.

The builders of the Mountain Valley Pipeline have filed an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a filing Friday, Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC asked Chief Justice John Roberts to reverse two recent federal appeals court decisions blocking construction of the project.

Congress last month passed a law that was supposed to allow construction to resume on the 300-mile natural gas pipeline.

But environmental groups and landowners convinced the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to put the project on hold again.

Opponents say the pipeline threatens hundreds of streams and could cause soil erosion and methane leaks. They say the federal agencies tasked with permitting the project have not done a sufficient examination of those impacts. 

Supporters say Congress unambiguously authorized the project to proceed. They’ve asked the court to make a decision by July 27.

Capito: Court’s Ruling Is ‘Another Bump’ For Gas Pipeline

Capito said the deal lawmakers reached last month, and the support of the White House, should reassure investors that the project will proceed.

One of the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s biggest supporters says it will move forward despite another legal setback.

U.S. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito says Congress made its intentions clear when it passed an agreement last month that required approval of all outstanding permits on the MVP project.

After the approval of both chambers of Congress, and the signature of President Joe Biden, though, the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked construction on the pipeline this week.

Capito said the deal lawmakers reached last month, and the support of the White House, should reassure investors that the project will proceed.

“So hopefully, in the short term, this is another bump, and a very frustrating one,” she said, “but hopefully, that’s all it is, is a bump in the road.”

Environmental groups and landowners are concerned about how the project could affect waterways, soil erosion and endangered species, including the nearly extinct candy darter — a fish that lives in streams near the pipeline’s proposed path.

U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Mountain Valley Pipeline Again

Congress expedited approval of all the pipeline’s outstanding permits in the debt ceiling deal lawmakers approved last month, but environmental groups and landowners again asked the Fourth Circuit to intervene.

Construction on a controversial natural gas pipeline is on hold again, and it’s the second legal setback for the project in as many days.

The Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday halted construction on the Mountain Valley Pipeline in West Virginia and Virginia.

The appeals court for the third time rejected the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s analysis of the pipeline’s impact on endangered species, including the candy darter, a nearly extinct fish.

The ruling comes a day after the same court blocked the U.S. Forest Service’s approval for construction on a three-mile portion of the 300-mile pipeline through the Jefferson National Forest.

Congress expedited approval of all the pipeline’s outstanding permits in the debt ceiling deal lawmakers approved last month, but environmental groups and landowners again asked the Fourth Circuit to intervene.

Opponents have expressed concerns about the safety of the pipeline and its impact on streams.

U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, one of the project’s biggest backers, called the new ruling “unlawful.”

“The law passed by Congress and signed by the president is clear,” Manchin said in a statement. “The 4th Circuit no longer has jurisdiction over Mountain Valley Pipeline’s construction permits.”

Federal Court Throws Out Key Mountain Valley Pipeline Permit

The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with environmental groups Tuesday and threw out a major federal water crossings permit for the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

Environmental advocates said the move could significantly slow down construction through much of West Virginia and is expected to affect about 160 miles of the pipeline’s route in the state.

In an order released just days after the court heard the case Friday, the court vacated the pipeline’s water-crossings permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Huntington District. The district encompasses much of the state, including the southern region, and the order affects major river crossings for the Elk, Gauley, Greenbrier and Meadow rivers.

History in the Courts

The Nationwide Permit 12 allows pipeline developers to disrupt streams, rivers and wetlands during construction, while maintaining water quality standards under the federal Clean Water Act.

The court in June halted construction of the 303-mile pipeline under bodies of water, because the pipeline developer’s own documents showed they could not complete construction quickly enough to comply with the federal Army Corps permit.

In late August, hours after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission decided construction could continue more broadly across the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s route, the 4th Circuit lifted its stay on water crossings in West Virginia.

‘Major Win’

But on Monday, the same court agreed with arguments made by environmental groups that the Army Corps erred when it allowed pipeline developers to use the “dry cut” method to install the pipeline through rivers and streams. That method includes damming the water source before pipeline installation and can take 4 to 6 weeks.

West Virginia environmental regulators proposed additional stipulations on the pipeline under the Nationwide Permit 12. The state requires all stream crossing be done within 72 hours.

“We conclude, for reasons to be more fully explained in a forthcoming opinion, that the Corps lacked authority to substitute the ‘dry cut’ requirement ‘in lieu of’ West Virginia’s 72-hour temporal restriction,”  the order stated.

The West Virginia DEP is currently weighing whether it should change the 72-hour special consideration for pipeline stream and river crossings.

Environmental groups called the decision a major win. In an emailed statement, Appalachian Mountain Advocates said it will “significantly impede construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline for the foreseeable future.”

They said the Army Corps will likely have to do additional environmental analysis and will likely be required to issue a project-specific Clean Water Act permit or “individual” permit, rather than the more general Nationwide Permit 12.

The Nationwide Permit 12 covers all stream and wetland disruptions caused by utility line construction nationwide. It is one of about 50 broader so-called “general permits” that can be granted under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.

Mountain Valley Pipeline spokeswoman Natalie Cox said in an email that developers were “disappointed” by the decision.

She said project developers are “evaluating options to understand its ability to continue with construction activities that do not include stream and wetland crossings along this portion of the route.”

Exit mobile version