Justice: Any State Employee Derelict Or Purposeful In Withholding Corrections Lawsuit Evidence Should Be Terminated Or Jailed

Homeland Security Secretary Mark Sorsaia,said nothing was intentional. He said there were administrative failures in preserving that evidence and some people were disciplined.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn ruled Monday that state employees intentionally destroyed emails and documents relating to a lawsuit alleging inhumane conditions at the Southern Regional Jail in Raleigh County.

In his weekly media briefing, Justice said if that happened, the guilty parties should be terminated or jailed. 

“When people are directed to not destroy something, or to supply something, and then they just don’t,” Justice said. “I think that it will be a very long and difficult day for those folks.”

In the briefing, Justice referred to his Homeland Security Secretary Mark Sorsaia, who said nothing was intentional. He said there were administrative failures in preserving that evidence and some people were disciplined.

“At this time, we have no evidence that any individual or individuals intentionally destroyed evidence or took affirmative action to make sure that evidence was hidden from disclosure,” Sorsaia said. 

Sorsaia did not say any employee was terminated and gave no details on the “administrative failures.” He said he disagreed with the judge on that issue. 

“We will agree that there were some mistakes in that process by individuals and those individuals no longer have any responsibility for future discovery,” Sorsaia said.

In producing discovery evidence regarding the civil suit, the state was ordered to put a legal hold on the emails and documents that were later deleted. Sorsaia blamed an automatic email deletion policy regarding outgoing state employees.    

“We discovered that the emails that they wanted belonged to people that had been gone more than five months,” Sorsaia said. “The IT department just routinely deleted them.”

Aboulhosn recommended a default judgment, holding the state liable for the charges in the lawsuit. Aboulhosn’s judgment will now go before District Judge Frank W. Volk to be confirmed. The defendants in the case have 14 days to object to the judgment and “modify or set aside any portion of the Order found clearly to be erroneous or contrary to law.”

The judge also ordered the court clerk to send a copy of the order to the United States Attorney to consider an investigation of the West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations.

West Virginia City Sues for $20 Million Hydro Plant Insurance Claim

A West Virginia city has filed a federal lawsuit seeking a $20 million insurance claim to cover damages at its hydroelectric plant.

The Intelligencer reports that the lawsuit was filed this month in U.S. District Court in Wheeling.

The city’s lawsuit claims Liberty Mutual Insurance Company wouldn’t cover losses at the plant located at the Hannibal Locks and Dam.

The lawsuit says one of the plant’s units was not operational for two and a half years, costing the city money from electricity it could have been producing.

It says bolts and nuts connecting a rubber hub to the turbine shaft were broken or disengaged, among other damages.

The lawsuit says Liberty denied the claim by concluding that the loss fell within an exclusion of coverage.

State Accused of Wasting Funding on Unused Fiber

West Virginia officials and a Frontier Communications have been accused of wasting government funding on unused fiber for internet connection.

The Charleston Gazette-Mail reports that internet company Citynet recently filed a federal lawsuit accusing Frontier and state officials of defrauding the U.S. government by paying the company to install fiber that didn’t meet federal grant guidelines.

The newspaper reports that at least $1.1 million in unused fiber was either built to closing schools or county education buildings that already received internet service through a different connection. Some of that fiber was used for less than a year, and much of it was never used at all.

The funding came from a $126 million federal grant from the U.S. government.

State officials didn’t comment on the lawsuit.

Exit mobile version