April 1, 1926: Belle DuPont Plant Produces North America's First High-Pressure Processed Ammonia

  On April 1, 1926, the DuPont plant at Belle produced North America’s first ammonia made from a high-pressure process. A few years before, chemical giant E. I. DuPont had decided to build an ammonia plant, using technology developed by Germany during World War I. The technology consisted of giant mechanical compressors, called ‘‘hypers,’’ which generated up to 15,000 pounds of pressure per square inch. In 1925, DuPont started construction of its new hyper-pressure plant in the eastern Kanawha County town of Belle.

The DuPont Belle Works went on to achieve many firsts. In 1927, it produced the first commercial synthetic wood alcohol, known as methanol. From 1937 to 1946, the plant generated rootstock chemicals for the world’s entire supply of nylon. All nylon used by the U.S. armed forces during World War II came from chemicals produced in Belle. By the early ’50s, more than 5,000 people worked at the DuPont Belle Works.

Production was reduced in the late 20th century, with ammonia eliminated as a product in 1978. Today, the plant still produces specialty chemicals, but with automation and new technology, the workforce has fallen below 700.

Punitive Damages Possible in Suit Against Dupont

A federal judge has rejected a motion arguing that evidence doesn’t support punitive damages for an Ohio woman who says she got cancer after drinking water contaminated by a chemical discharged from a DuPont plant.

The case might help settle thousands of similar lawsuits about the chemical giant’s dumping of C8 into local drinking water.

Plaintiff Clara Bartlett alleges Delaware-based DuPont didn’t inform the public but knew potential risks posed by C8 that was deposited into the Ohio River by a plant near Parkersburg, West Virginia.

DuPont’s chief scientist has testified he didn’t know until 2012 that C8 could cause several diseases.

The Columbus Dispatch reports the judge said a “reasonable jury” could have enough evidence to favor punitive damages in the case. He previously refused to dismiss it.

Exit mobile version