W.Va. Democrats Ask For Investigation Of CPS

In response to the DHHR’s inability to produce Child Protective Service travel records, the West Virginia Democratic Party has asked for an investigation into the department.

On Tuesday, the West Virginia Democratic Party (WVDP) Chair Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha issued a letter to Gov. Jim Justice, urging him to launch an immediate and thorough investigation into the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) handling of a particular child neglect case.

Earlier reporting by Eyewitness News revealed two children were found living in “devastating conditions” in a shed, with minimal facilities and inadequate care, leading to felony child neglect charges against Donald Ray Lantz and Jeanne Kay Whitefeather.

A recent Freedom of Information Act request by West Virginia Watch indicates that no travel records exist from Child Protective Service (CPS) workers confirming that they never visited the home despite multiple complaints from neighbors about the well-being of the children.

“The neighbors in this close-knit community out in Sissonville, the neighbors had been repeatedly calling CPS and at least we don’t see any kind of evidence that CPS responded to that,” Pushkin said. “To me, that’s very troubling and that warrants an investigation.”

In the letter, the WVDP states that they believe this CPS case is not an isolated incident but a symptom of a larger systematic issue within the state’s child welfare system.

“They can’t produce any documents to show that they actually responded, which would lead us to believe that they did not respond to these calls,” Pushkin said. “Is this an isolated incident? Or is this more part of just a culture of complacency or competency over there? And if so, is it possibly due to staffing shortages?”

Pushkin noted Justice’s “flat budget” as a possible reason behind CPS understaffing and shortcomings.

“Now the legislature and the governor can pat each other on the back for passing flat budgets and creating these artificial surpluses over the years,” Pushkin said. “But what does that really mean? It very well could possibly mean that we aren’t meeting essential services that need to be provided to the state, very least of which, would be taking care of children in the state’s custody. If we can’t do that, what can the state government do?”

Ongoing Litigation

DHHR employees and Justice are defendants in an ongoing class action lawsuit, originally filed in 2019, that alleged the state had violated the constitutional rights of more than 6,000 kids in the state foster system. 

Allegations include the state failing to protect children, overburdened CPS workers, and leaving kids to languish in the system without any permanency plan.

Plaintiffs in the suit, A Better Childhood, a New York-based nonprofit, along with Shafer and Shafer and Disability Rights West Virginia, recently asked for sanctions in the case due to lack of evidence retention from the defendants.

The motion accuses the DHHR of “deliberate indifference” to due process claims brought by the attorneys representing foster children against DHHR.

Justice’s chief of staff, Brian Abraham, said in October, that the emails were deleted because of the Office of Technology’s protocol to delete the emails of employees who’d left their positions with the state.

“This administration was unaware that there was a policy in place at the Office of Technology to delete the emails of employees who left employment with the state of West Virginia,” Abraham said. “So there’s no basis whatsoever for any allegation that emails were intentionally deleted from any agency.”

Abraham added that the administration was not sure when the policy began or who enacted it, but said they are investigating this state-wide policy.

Marcia Robinson Lowry,the lead plaintiff in the case, said the defendants knew the emails she sought were evidence in the case.

“We don’t know whether anybody destroyed them willfully, or whether it was just more questions of competence and thoroughness on the part of the state, the state runs right now a very, very dysfunctional child welfare system,” Lowry said.

Dividing the DHHR

During the 2023 Legislative Session state lawmakers voted to divide the DHHR into three separate departments to increase transparency and improve outcomes in foster care. The new departments go into effect on Jan. 1.

There will now be a Department of Human Services for programs like Child Protective Services, a Department of Health and a Department of Health Facilities for facilities like state-run hospitals. Each agency will also have its own secretary to lead the agency.

The new secretaries are Dr. Sherri Young, incoming secretary of the Department of Health, Dr. Cynthia Persily, incoming secretary of the Department of Human Services and Michael Caruso, incoming secretary of the Department of Health Facilities.

Pushkin voted in favor of splitting the department but has voiced concerns about the efficacy of the split in improving health outcomes for West Virginia.

“Well, you know why I voted to split up the DHHR to three separate departments have often said, unless we really address the culture there,” Pushkin said. “Instead of having just one large dysfunctional department, we’re going to wind up with quite possibly three, slightly smaller, dysfunctional departments, until we really start prioritizing what’s important.”

Del. Pushkin Calls for Resolution to Investigate Supreme Court Chief Justice

Updated: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 3:48 p.m.

 

A member of the House of Delegates has pledged to introduce a resolution to determine whether impeachment proceedings against state Supreme Court Chief Justice Allen Loughry are appropriate.

Democrat Delegate Mike Pushkin called for the resolution during a floor session Thursday. It follows a string of reports on what he called “irresponsible spending” by the West Virginia Supreme Court, as well as the discovery of the “Cass Gilbert” desk in Loughry’s home office.

The resolution would call for the House Judiciary Committee to investigate the matter.

Credit West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
/
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Chief Justice Allen Loughry.

“He has taken no responsibility, no accountability for what’s gone under his watch and in his office and in his home while he has been Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,” Pushkin said.

 

“So, I believe it’s our constitutional responsibility as an equal branch of government to be that check against the irresponsible activities going on under this court.”

Pushkin said he had three co-sponsors on the resolution by Thursday afternoon — all Democrats — and expects more to sign on. House Republicans have yet to comment on whether they would support the resolution.

 

Legislative auditor’s announced this week they plan to audit the Supreme Court. The announced plans of an audit follow reports from late 2017 of the court spending more than $3.7 million to renovate and redecorate justices’ Capitol offices.

Republican leadership in the House and Senate have discussed offering a resolution to bring the Supreme Court’s budget under the Legislature’s review. Current law keeps the Supreme Court’s budget independent of the legislative branch. With that in mind, Pushkin said he sees no reason why Republicans would not support his proposed resolution.

A request for comment from the Supreme Court was acknowledged but not answered.

 

The Supreme Court is slated to give a budget presentation to the House Finance Committee at 9 a.m. Friday and to the Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday, January 18 at 3 p.m.

 

W.Va. House Amends Voter ID Bill

The House of Delegates will vote on a contentious piece of legislation Friday; a bill that would require West Virginians to show a form of identification at their polling place. But on Thursday, the bill saw a change on the floor.

House Bill 4013, the voter ID bill, would require West Virginia voters to show a photo ID or some kind of other official documentation to prove their identity before voting at the polls. A voter without proper documentation will be allowed to vote on a provisional ballot.

Supporters of the bill say it will help avoid voter fraud and make vote counting more reliable. But those opposed say it will keep people from the polls, bringing in another step to the voting process and possibly increase wait times.

Democrats proposed three amendments Thursday, but only one of them passed. That amendment was suggested by Delegate Mike Pushkin from Kanawha County.

His amendment allows someone over the age of 70 to renew their license at the DMV with a religious family heirloom to show proof of birth.

Republican Delegate Patrick Lane of Kanawha County is the lead sponsor of the bill, and he says Pushkin’s amendment is good, because the DMV currently has a policy that allows people to bring in a family Bible as proof of birth.

“Delegate Pushkin’s concern, I think, was that Bible is a specific religious document, it identifies as specific religion, and there are obviously are provisions in our West Virginia State Constitution that prohibit recognizing a particular religion, and so his language provides a general religious document exception to that,” Lane said.

The voter ID bill will be up for a final vote in the House Friday.

Exit mobile version