House Moves to Terminate the W.Va. Women's Commission

Delegates are beginning to consider bills that would cut some state agencies, no matter how big or how small they are. Members of one committee Friday looked at a bill that would put an end to an agency that receives about $150,000 in annual funding.

House Bill 2646 would get rid of the West Virginia Women’s Commission. It’s a small state agency with just two employees, one of whom works part-time. The House Government Organization Committee considered the bill Friday morning – where its sponsors defended the proposal.

The West Virginia Women’s Commission was created by the state Legislature in 1977. It’s a bi-partisan organization under the state Department of Health and Human Resources with a mission to promote women through advocacy, research, and education. Over the past few years, one of the commission’s  main focuses has been to encourage women to run for legislative office, boards, or commissions through recruiting and training events.

Chair of the Women’s Commission Stacy North says she feels if the agency is shutdown, it would be detrimental to West Virginia.

“Image-wise, I think it’d be horrible,” North said, “I mean, it’s neglecting a huge segment of the population. It’s making it look like we don’t care. So, that would be a horrific move.”

The House Government Organization Committee discussed the bill at length Friday morning. Vice-Chair Delegate Lynne Arvon of Raleigh County noted the Commission has done good things for some women, but she feels the group’s mission is one that can be found through other organizations.

“I see a lot of overlapping responsibility here, and to me what we’re trying to do, this year particularly with the budget we have, even though their budget’s between $150,000 to $200,000 each year, some people just think that’s just a drop in the bucket, maybe, but every drop in the bucket adds up,” Arvon explained, “and I’m looking at ways we can start eliminating duplicative services. I don’t believe the Women’s Commission should be a government funded commission.”

That didn’t seem to satisfy the minority party in committee, however. Democratic members of the committee disagreed with Arvon, including Delegate Mike Caputo of Marion County.

“They’re the go-to group for women to hopefully find avenues to get where they need to be, and more importantly, they’re a non-partisan group,” Caputo said, “This group has been very clear about their non-partisanship, about what they do for the state of West Virginia, and I find it very odd that the bill was partisan; every sponsor on the bill is from the majority party, so we’re not seeing any bi-partisan effort here in whether this is a good idea or not.”

The House bill has a total of 8 sponsors, all of whom are Republican women. Even so, Democratic Delegate Michael Ferro of Marshall County says he worries about the public’s perception of the action.

“In the eyes of the general public, it is gonna look like, as my colleague from Marion said, that 23 men are taking a personal front against women. That might not be the case; that might not be the intent of the sponsors, but I guarantee that, that’s the perception that’s gonna be out there,” Ferro explained.

The bill’s lead sponsor, Delegate Kayla Kessinger of Fayette County, says the Commission is unnecessary, and she says the work the commission does, particularly around election recruitment, is something women in the state are capable of doing on their own.

“I think every woman that is currently serving and has served in West Virginia has won based on her merits, her character, and voters willingness to believe in them,” she said.

Kessinger says she understands the concerns, but she still fully believes in the proposal.

“But the fact of the matter is, women are completely capable of becoming significant and achieving their dreams and goals on their own without government assistance,” Kessinger noted, “and I think that is what truly empowers women is the ability to accomplish their dreams, their goals without relying on the government.”

Delegate Barbara Evans Fleischauer is one of just two democratic women in the House of Delegates. She opposes the bill.

“Women in West Virginia are not doing as well in comparison to the rest of the country or in comparison to the world,” Fleischauer explained, “I mean, United States women lag behind when it comes to the number of women in elected office, than it comes to women on corporate boards, than it comes to women graduates – I mean we’re far behind in many countries when it comes to graduation from college, and we need to do better.”

House Bill 2646 was voted out of committee and will be sent to the full chamber for a vote that’s likely to come next week. Female representation in the West Virginia Legislature is at its lowest rate since 1984. After the 2016 election, just 18 members of the House of Delegates and Senate are women.

House Bill Would Strengthen Whistleblower Protections

Leaders in West Virginia’s House of Delegates say they plan to strengthen a number of ethics laws in West Virginia this legislative session. The first piece of legislation making its way through that chamber this year is House Bill 2006, increasing penalties for violating the state’s Whistle-Blower Law.

A whistleblower is someone who notifies the authorities when a person or organization they work for is involved in some kind of illegal activity. West Virginia’s Whistle-Blower Law protects a public employee from retaliation after coming forward about abuse from his or her employer.

House Judiciary Chairman John Shott, of Mercer County, is the bill’s lead sponsor. He says the penalties currently on the books for an employer who violates this law – or retaliates against the employee doing the whistleblowing – is a fine of up to $500 as well as a suspension from his or her job for up to six months. But Shott says House Bill 2006 changes that.

“It gives them a greater penalty, and it also increases the monetary penalty from $500 to $5,000, but it takes it out of the hands of the judge except to make a finding, and puts it back in the hands of the public agency to take the action against the offender,” Shott said.

The bill makes it clear that the offender would have to personally pay the fine. Instead of the six month suspension, the bill gives the public agency the option to completely terminate any employee who tries to discourage or punish a whistleblower.

“A person who reports misconduct or waste should not be retaliated against,” Shott said, “and this just strengthens the protection of those people so they feel comfortable coming forward if the penalties for someone who retaliates against them are strengthened.”

Delegate Barbara Evans Fleischauer, of Monongalia County, is the Minority Chair for House Judiciary. She says she thinks the bill is a great improvement, adding her name to the legislation as a co-sponsor.

“If we have somebody that comes forward and says there’s fraud, there’s abuse going on, and then they’re retaliated against, I think they’re doing something that helps the public, and so I think that making the person who is retaliating personally liable is the way it should be,” Fleischauer noted, “The taxpayers shouldn’t have to cover the cost of the fine. I think it’s a really good bill.”

Fleischauer says this bill is an example of how legislators can work in a bipartisan way to create better policy in the state.

Chairman Shott says this ethics bill will be one of several to come before the House this session.

Exit mobile version