Federal Researchers Ask Berkeley County Residents for Help Studying PFAS Chemicals

A federal public health agency is launching a study this fall that will evaluate Berkeley County residents’ exposure to the PFAS group of chemicals, which includes PFOA, or C8.

 

 

The perfluoroalkyl chemicals are used to make nonstick products and are found in some flame retardants including firefighting foam.

Representatives for the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) told a crowd of about two dozen people who attended an information session Wednesday evening that public participation is crucial to the study. 

“We hope you all become ambassadors for what we’re trying to do and if you talk about this amongst your neighbors and if you hear of someone who has a letter you encourage them to participate,” said Patrick Breysse, head of ATSDR and the Centers for Disease Control’s National Center for Environmental Health. 

Federal researchers are launching PFAS exposure assessments in eight communities across the country that are near military sites, including Berkeley County. The study was prompted by Congress, which mandated the research in the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act. 

The exposure assessment is the first step toward understanding more about how PFAS chemicals might affect human health, said Rachel Rogers, an environmental health scientist who leads ATSDR’s work on PFAS. 

“The goal of this exposure assessment is to understand how people have been exposed,” she said. “We’ll be doing that by measuring levels of PFAS in people’s bodies, specifically in their blood and in their urine.”

Berkeley County was selected because of its proximity to the Shepherd Field Air National Guard Base. In 2016, the City of Martinsburg shut down its Big Springs water plant after U.S. Environmental Protection Agency testing revealed PFAS in the water at unsafe levels. Groundwater was likely contaminated by PFAS-laden firefighting foam used at the nearby base. 

Brad Goodwin, coordinator of the exposure assessment, said the goal of the study is to learn more about how much PFAS residents have in their bodies and where it could have come from. 

 

“So we’ll be able to look at the concentrations of PFAS in people’s blood here in Berkeley County and see how those compared to people that didn’t get exposed through drinking water and understand how much additional exposure there may have been,” he said. 

To be scientifically rigorous, the study needs 395 randomly selected participants from the Berkeley County area. Letters inviting people to participate were sent out this week. 

In addition to giving a urine and blood sample, participants will be asked to answer a short questionnaire about the ways they may have been exposed to the Teflon chemicals. The researchers will also collect tap water and indoor dust samples at some homes. 

Researchers will be in Berkeley County in late September and early October. 

Previous research, including from the Parkersburg region where residents were exposed to DuPont’s C8 chemical for decades, has shown exposure to these chemicals at low levels is linked to some cancers and thyroid problems. PFAS chemicals have been detected in at least 10 water systems in Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia.

ATSDR researcher Rodgers stressed the exposure assessments will not address if and how exposure to PFAS through drinking water impacts health. 

“Those are important questions that we are looking to answer down the road,” she said. “This exposure assessment is just a first step in that direction.”

The agency is planning on undertaking a health impacts study later. 

All residents who live in a household that receive a letter are eligible to participate as long as they are at least three years old, lived in the area for at least one year before May 19, 2016 and don’t suffer from a blood disorder. 

Final results from all sites involved in the assessments are expected by late 2021.

Previously Blocked Federal Study Raises Alarm About C8 Chemicals

The Trump administration today released a politically charged study on the health impacts of perfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS chemicals, including the compound known as C8, which has been detected in some water systems in the Ohio Valley.

 

The draft report, released by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), finds these fluorinated chemicals, which are used in some nonstick products and flame retardants, can endanger human health at levels 7 to 10 times lower than the Environmental Protection Agency has previously said were safe.

Pressure on the Trump administration has been mounting for weeks to publicly disseminate the study. A growing number of lawmakers and advocacy groups have pressed the White House for action following news reports that the EPA had blocked its release.

Both West Virginia Senators, Joe Manchin (D) and Shelley Moore Capito (R), praised the release of ATSDR’s report.

“After repeatedly pushing the administration to make these findings public, I’m very glad to see it release this study today,” Capito said in a news release. “The information contained in the report will help determine potential threats our communities face as a result of certain water contamination issues, and that’s critical to ensuring the health of West Virginians.”

The report, or toxicological profile, draws upon the best available research. At 852 pages, it is aimed at giving public health officials a comprehensive picture of how fluorinated chemicals may affect human health as well as highlight the different ways people may be exposed to them.

The study finds people are exposed to fluorinated chemicals in a variety of ways including through contaminated soil and water, food packaging laced with the chemicals and some more directly by living near plants that manufactured C8.

It finds exposure to high levels of some fluorinated chemicals may affect fertility, increase cholesterol levels and increase the risk of thyroid disease.

Olga Naidenko, senior science advisor with the Environmental Working Group, a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy organization, said the analysis especially highlights how these chemicals are toxic to developing fetuses, pregnant women and young children.  

“ATSDR’s profile really highlighted how very low, low doses can be harmful to developing fetuses, but also, for example, to the immune systems of young kids,” she said. “That’s something that EPA’s profile didn’t do.”

In 2016, the EPA issued a health advisory for some PFAS chemicals, including PFOA, or C8, and the related compound PFOS, often linked to flame retardant foam sprays.

The EPA says water contaminated with more than 70 parts-per-trillion is unsafe to drink. Naidenko said since the EPA conducted its own study of these chemicals, much more research has been published, and that research was included in this new report.

“It certainly represents a science and policy advance on this important issue,” she said.

Understanding how exposure to C8 and other fluorinated chemicals affects human health hits close to home in the Ohio Valley. Some municipalities in Ohio and West Virginia have been dealing with C8 contamination for decades.

Dupont’s Washington Works plant in Parkersburg, West Virginia, dumped over 7,000 tons of C8 sludge in a nearby landfill where it leached out. The chemical polluted streams and exposure killed nearby livestock in the late 1990s. A lawsuit against DuPont on behalf of residents resulted in a settlement and established health studies which have expanded the knowledge of health risks.

In 2016, PFOA and PFOS contaminated firefighting foam used by the National Guard contaminated the city’s drinking water plant in Martinsburg, West Virginia.The city paid $4.5 million to install water treatment filters, and recentlysued the National Guard for damages to recoup those costs.

The new report also recommends Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) for some PFAS chemicals. MRLs are an estimate of the amount of a chemical a person can eat, drink or breathe each day without it posing a health risk. Public health officials at both a federal and state level use these health-based values to determine if a community is at risk from chemical exposure.

ATSDR only suggested levels for oral ingestion of some PFAS chemicals. For PFOA and PFOS, the risk levels listed were far lower than what the EPA considers safe. The agency will take comments on the toxicological profile for 30 days.

Exit mobile version